no blood connection, not only is sex ok, but you can have kids and they wont be retarded, go all out imo, dont even wear a raincoat.
Poll: Step sibling off-limits or not?
- Thread starter AgDr_ODST
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I think that they inspire each other. Off-topic usually works in trends ive noticed. Like earlier today there was a thread about Halibob getting a new avatar; and directly below that was a thread asking why people idolise high posters.AkJay said:
thats an entirely different more f***ed up matter right there. So I'll NOT be making that poll. If you'd like you may. But I know incest is wrong. I just don't think what I've asked in the poll(which by definition is not incest) is wrong. Akward yes but not wrongblue heartless said:
What is it this evening with people wanting to get down with their immediate relatives?
OT: There's nothing technically, biologically, or legally wrong with it, but it does raise some moral red flags. Then again, morality is completely subjective, so if you don't see anything wrong with it, then you've got no problem.
OT: There's nothing technically, biologically, or legally wrong with it, but it does raise some moral red flags. Then again, morality is completely subjective, so if you don't see anything wrong with it, then you've got no problem.
If we were atracted to one another then yes... sex all the time, right down the hall, with someone you dont actually have to date, sounds ok to me. ultimately i would want to get a real girlfriend move out the house and have a real life... but if its THAT good... im living at home!! haha.
You know what? Forget I even wrote that, because I just remembered the movie "Drive Me Crazy" starring Melissa Joan Hart.AgDr_ODST said:
Look it up. The ending more or less makes your argument for you.
While those are crappy poll options, if I had a step-sister and we were in love, I'd have sex with her. We're not blood related, so no problem. Well, I'm the guy that wouldn't mind if she had some blood relation either. That'd just mean heavy use of birth control on both our parts.
I am only going to say this once here, and it will apply to all degrees of incest.
I have only two problems with it. The first is the potential offspring, the second is that barring extraordinary circumstances it is very likely to fuck you up mentally and emotionally. Extraordinary circumstances such as "I didn't know I had a sister, let alone that it was her".
The familial bond is a very powerful thing, and most such bonds in today's world cannot involve sexual relations without being affected for the worse. However, not all blood siblings share that bond, due to distance or what have you. Take out the social aspect and children that may result if they're not careful, and who does it really harm? I'm not suggesting that the social aspect is a minor one at all; simply that it's not always there.
I have no moral objection to love between two people who don't socially share a familial bond, regardless of their actual genetic relationship. My worldview allows for two lovers who are just like any other couple other than a genetic closeness. And I would wish them all the best. I would draw the line at offspring, but apart from that, go nuts. Just be careful how you publicise it, for obvious reasons.
So, to actually answer the OP: Go for it.
And now, I shall equip my flame shield, for I am clearly a sick bastard who should be shot for valuing love and happiness over social norms.
I have only two problems with it. The first is the potential offspring, the second is that barring extraordinary circumstances it is very likely to fuck you up mentally and emotionally. Extraordinary circumstances such as "I didn't know I had a sister, let alone that it was her".
The familial bond is a very powerful thing, and most such bonds in today's world cannot involve sexual relations without being affected for the worse. However, not all blood siblings share that bond, due to distance or what have you. Take out the social aspect and children that may result if they're not careful, and who does it really harm? I'm not suggesting that the social aspect is a minor one at all; simply that it's not always there.
I have no moral objection to love between two people who don't socially share a familial bond, regardless of their actual genetic relationship. My worldview allows for two lovers who are just like any other couple other than a genetic closeness. And I would wish them all the best. I would draw the line at offspring, but apart from that, go nuts. Just be careful how you publicise it, for obvious reasons.
So, to actually answer the OP: Go for it.
And now, I shall equip my flame shield, for I am clearly a sick bastard who should be shot for valuing love and happiness over social norms.