thelastgentleman said:
*Facepalm
Please read my previous comments.
No I don't agree that depression should be a medical disease as it currently is. Im not saying this to be insensitive, but seriously from a medical standpoint it was only added to benefit from the financial pocketbooks of major drug companies. I know this sounds very conspiracy heavy but from a personal experience it is true. Saying that a population is suffering from "Cronic Depression" is the equivalence to saying 80% of the U.S population under the age of 10 have ADHD and need immediate treatment to surcome their disorder....No for the love of god no they dont. Their only problem is that THEY ARE KIDS their Calcitonin levels are there their Insulin levels are not proper yet and they are rambunctious. A natural reaction to a natural cause...thats all depression is. Of course im taking a highly humanist and psychoanalytical approach to this, but a minor hitch in serotonin levels does not constitute a disorder. Dont get me wrong there are worse diseases that have less deficiencies, but take a look at your body under sympathetic stress and you'll find your ALL people suffer from Depression its a mental inhibitor that must be overcome by the individual not drowned out by medication.
I am now seriously worried. I hope, at least, that you do not work at all with anyone dealing with mental disorders. The reason for that, of course, is the arguments you're constructing. While I don't have the time to spare for an exhaustive list, I'll point out a few examples. First, I wouldn't argue that a "minor" hitch in serotonin levels should necessarily constitute and be diagnosed as a mood disorder, sure. But you accompany that with a statement that depression categorically should not be classified a
disorder (which is the preferred term when addressing mental health issues, not "disease"). Secondly, you seem to equate that since everyone has, to some degree, the same biochemical processes in their brain, that must mean everyone has depression. That's just as nonsensical as claiming that since everyone's cells grow, everyone has cancer. Thirdly, you prove ham-handedly that you have zero understanding of what the words "humanist" and "psychoanalytical" work. Your entire argument is riddled with rampant flaws, steeped in speculative conspiracy, and only serves to embarrass you.
Again, I urge you to find another job.