Terry Pratchett's style of humour is one of my very favourite things in the world =) It's so sad that he has Alzheimers...
Whoops. Sorry 'bout that. It's just the damned name translation. Anyway, it was a very interesting read.SonicWaffle said:A half-brick in a sock! Mightiest weapon on the Disc...Kiefer13 said:Diablini said:Kiefer13 said:Correct. And when you are incredibly lucky, what else do you need?Diablini said:That's Rincewind, right? Wait. Who wants to be Rincewind? He can't use magic, nor hold a sword. But he is incredibly lucky.Kiefer13 said:Take a look at my avatar, and then guess.
You're thinking of Monstrous Regiment. Men at Arms was the Watch book about the gonne.Diablini said:Not quite the fan of "Cohen the Barbarian" huh? Yep, I like him too, at least he's got some common sense (Sense maybe, but skill - no). I liked Men at Arms very much, and almost at the end it turns out that:
Every single one of the soldiers in that troop is a woman in disguise. Even the general.
OT: He's my very, very favourite writer. His books have almost all been solid gold in terms of quality. Unfortunately, he's definately slipping. Unseen Academicals, while funny in a few places, simply cannot measure up to the quality of his previous works. The storyline is duller, and a lot more cliched. A lot of strange quirks are seeping in too, that were less evident in earlier books - random non-sequiters, duller characters, and oddly enough a lot more swearing. I think a large part of the problem is that he no longer writes the books himself, he is forced to narrate them. The writing process is probably very different now.
However, there are still times that the brilliance shines through. I loved Dr Hix, and his concept of acceptable evil by college statute :-D
Yes I am. Damned name translations.PurpleLemur said:That would be Monstrous Regiment, no? Just saying, you might be traumatising some poor souls who've not read it.Diablini said:Not quite the fan of "Cohen the Barbarian" huh? Yep, I like him too, at least he's got some common sense (Sense maybe, but skill - no). I liked Men at Arms very much, and almost at the end it turns out that:
Every single one of the soldiers in that troop is a woman in disguise. Even the general.
Diablini said:Well he's still prevailing over it. I hope he doesn't reach the point where he thinks he's Sam Vimes.Fat Man Spoon said:Bahhaha!
I've read almost all of his.
Bloody fantastic.
Damn shame about the Alzheimers, though.
Anyways, love him! He is a genius.
Diablini said:Not quite the fan of "Cohen the Barbarian" huh? Yep, I like him too, at least he's got some common sense (Sense maybe, but skill - no). I liked Monstrous Regiment very much, and almost at the end it turns out that:Kiefer13 said:Well, quite.Diablini said:A wacky companion with some magic Luggage.Kiefer13 said:Correct. And when you are incredibly lucky, what else do you need?Diablini said:That's Rincewind, right? Wait. Who wants to be Rincewind? He can't use magic, nor hold a sword. But he is incredibly lucky.Kiefer13 said:Take a look at my avatar, and then guess.
The reason Rincewind is one of my favourite characters is not because he is a hero, but rather because he is not. He's an incompetent coward that survives merely on the virtue of his wit, incredible luck and his ability to run like the clappers whenever the situation demands it (which is quite often). And as a consequence is much more interesting to read about than yet another standard cliche sword-wielding warrior or spell-flinging wizard.
Every single one of the soldiers in that troop is a woman in disguise. Even the general.
It's called 'Making Money'... He runs the bank. It's gooodavouleance2nd said:Wait there is a pre/sequel to going postal cool what?s its calledCakeDragon said:I lovelovelove Moist von Lipwig, I think the books with him are amazing..!
I also love the watch and the witches. Oh, and also the wizards.
Ohh, he is such a good author!![]()
In case that makes no sense there are other books with moist are there and what are they
ShakyFiend said:Thought id make this thread, 1. cos his new just came out. 2. A stage version of 'Nation' is playing at national and im going to see it. 3. He is a truly brilliant author.
Also there seem to a disproportionate amount of gamers who like Terry Pratchett, is there something about him that appeals specifically to gamers? So do you like him or not? say why and if you haven't read any yet I strongly recommend you do.
Ummm i read somewhere thats itll be called raising taxes, and pretty much leads on from the end of making money, if you rember the ending of it...should be interestingthe_dancy_vagrant said:I actually like Moist a lot, too. Out of the discworld novels that Terry has written in the past 6 years, the ones involving him are much more like his older books. It's too bad that he's only been in two books, but I remember having read somewhere that there will likely be a third novel with him as the main character.Reaperman64 said:sorry for double post but had to commentthe_dancy_vagrant said:It has had an effect, sadly. I actually posted in another thread because I've recently gone back and read some of his books. Monstrous Regiment and the ones that he's written after that seem to have lost a lot of the...I don't know what to call it. I can't put my finger on what's missing from the new ones, but it's definitely noticeable. I read the most recent book, Unseen Academicals, and had to rush through just to finish it. I was sad that one of my favorite authors seems to have lost his edge and pissed off that his being sick is affecting him in this way.Fat Man Spoon said:Hmm?ShakyFiend said:Interestingly it dosent seem to affecting his writing style that much
He only got it rather recently.
We'd have to wait for his new book to come out to see any difference.
i know what you mean. while moist von lipwig is officially my favourte charecter, the book is a strong departure from his style
when reaing his work you instantly get the *Yup tis pratchett* and recently its lost some of that
however i thourougly enjoy all of it, monstourous regiment was a low point as it just seemed too....unlikely i suppose
I do get what people are saying about Unseen Academicals not being quite as good as some of his other stuff, but it is really like comparing the first matrix to th other two. The first was considered by many to be utterly brilliant, and whilst the others were actually pretty damn decent films, if not astounding, they were doomed to be in the shadow of the original. I get the feeling it's a bit like that with Pratchett.Redingold said:Yeah, Pratchett's gotta be my favourite, though I have to agree that Unseen Academicals is, unfortunately, not quite up to scratch.