Poll: The CIA

Recommended Videos

Kevvers

New member
Sep 14, 2008
388
0
0
Why they don't use Sodium Pentathol (the 'truth serum'), I thought that worked better than torture anyway. I mean, won't the hardcore terrorists have undergone anti-torture training?
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
Mask of 1000 Faces said:
Wicky_42 said:
I like to believe that they're constantly saving our countries from the dastardly plots of evil terrorists and megalomaniacs every day, but they can't let the public know because it would cause too much panic. Just like in the movies.
*sniffles*

I wouldn't panic. I'd go, oh, I totally played that in a mission in one of these shooters I have.

Yay Gamers!
You know what, I think you're right - nowadays we're so used to seeing danger and intrigue at the cinema, on TV and in our games that I think the majority of gamers would think it rather awesome to know what was going on behind the scenes, on just how kick-ass the agencies really are when they get things right :D

CIA said:
This thread drastically lowers my self-esteem.
Does that count as a terrorist attack? :S
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,402
0
0
Therumancer said:
cuddly_tomato said:
Therumancer said:
How many of you on these forums are liberals who complain about things like secret spy trials, Gitmo, and the torturing of suspects? Congrats, you are officially part of why we are getting murdered in the intelligence game.
Me.

Sorry, but torturing someone until they claim they are a terrorist just to get you to stop does not make them a terrorist.
*Ahem*

This exact kind of statement is exactly why the situation is such a mess. Not meaning to pick on you Cuddly Tomato, but whenever torture comes up you tend to see pretty dumb and ill informed statements like this.

You are correct in so far that using torture to extract a confession does not work.

The thing is though we're not talking about it being used to extract a confession but rather to gather information.
Which is completely unreliable as the "information" has been obtained through torture. History has proven that torture doesn't work.

Therumancer said:
At any rate, I suspect torture has gotten such a "bad rap" and is thought about in such idiotic terms because of things like The Inquisition. The problem when looking at things like that though is that it wasn't based on any kind of logical policing. The whole rationale was based on faith and mysticism, and the guys being tortured were seen as being possesed and the only way to "save their soul" before execution was to drive out the demon, the confession being a symbol of the person's admission of sin and repentance.
The reason torture as "bad rap" is because it is a "bad thing".

It is thought about in such "idiotic" terms because torture is "idiocy".

For years intelligence gathering was done properly. The CIA and other groups knew how to do their jobs effectively because they didn't have all the digital shit they rely on now. Then 9/11 happened and they realized that the spy satelites and NORAD and early warning systems and AWACs and other new fangled crap were totally ineffective against the enemy they were facing.

They needed different methods of intelligence gathering, but had lost all they had learned over the past century because their thought traditional on-the-ground methods of intelligence gathering were quaint and unreliable. In desperation they turned to torturing suspects and holding them in places like Gitmo and Abu Gharib. And you know what? It was just as useless as spy satelites. Bin Laden is still out there, Mullar Omah is still out there, attacks are still going on, and the world is no more closer to security.

Torture doesn't work.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Darkside360 said:
beddo said:
The CIA needs to stop spying on its own civilians who pose no threat. In fact the threat to the US is almost so low that the CIA have little else to do.

It's unbelievable that the Government still bothers with mass surveillance given the current economic situation.
Are you crazy? Our enemies are already in the country, to not keep watching the public is stupid. Especially in an economic crisis like this, it would be the perfect time to attack.
Ha! The propagandists certainly got to you didn't they? So ready to give up your constitutional rights for the illusion of freedom.

The biggest enemy of the US is the enemy within, the enemy that keeps trying to obliterate your rights given under the Constitution of the United States of America. They claim it's to protect you but without our principles, what is left to protect?
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Cuddly, torture works wonderfully when conducted properly by people who can analyze the information. Simply put you don't like the idea, a lot of people don't, but history has never shown that it doesn't work, quite the opposite. This is why it's a "human rights" issue and there wouldn't be a demand to use it if it wasn't reliable.

The thing is that when conducting a proper "hard" interrogation you are going to have people handy with an idea of the whole situation to put what is extracted into context, not sitting there simply accepting anything the guy tells you.

As far as the admissability, well the entire point is to bypass the legal system and give groups like the CIA a free hand when it comes to intenational issues.

Other than personally not liking it, really there isn't much you can say about it.

As far as the "failure" of things like Gitmo and the like, they failed because they were under public scrutiny and had people crawling all over them, making cases based on the existing laws/standards. Had we changed those laws/standards and kept the public from being involved at all, then it would have been something entirely differant.

Had we conducted outselves more efficiently and not held back due to moral kid gloves (our own society fighting itself effectively) we probably would have nailed Bin Ladin and Omar.

Though admittedly when it comes to Mullah Omar it's more of a touchy subject. We actually had every reason to believe that he (and the Taliban) would support us against Al Queda once they struck against the US since we pretty much gave them control of Afghanistan by helping them force out the Russians, and taking the pro-USSR faction (now the "Northern Alliance") out of the picture.

Honestly, had we simply blitzed Afghanistan unannounced we could have accomplished a lot, but that relies on Hindsight, and I really can't blame the goverment for thinking that Omar would have backed us and leading diplomatically.


At any rate we're going to have to agree to disagree, I don't see us having a meeting of the minds on this paticular issue.
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,402
0
0
ChromeAlchemist said:
cuddly_tomato said:
DEVILMAN!

The Manga was awesome. The live action film was terrible.
The animated film was awesome. The series was blasphemy.

...There was a live action film?
Here is a clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUa1NSqSbZc&feature=related

But seriously - forget about it. I am a huge fan of the Manga cartoon (Birth + Demon Bird), and imported that on DVD because I was so psyched for it, but I really wish I hadn't.
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
cuddly_tomato said:
ChromeAlchemist said:
cuddly_tomato said:
DEVILMAN!

The Manga was awesome. The live action film was terrible.
The animated film was awesome. The series was blasphemy.

...There was a live action film?
Here is a clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUa1NSqSbZc&feature=related

But seriously - forget about it. I am a huge fan of the Manga cartoon (Birth + Demon Bird), and imported that on DVD because I was so psyched for it, but I really wish I hadn't.
...what?

The funniest thing is, as soon as I saw the guy, I thought 'is he french?' then I saw the text around the video and heard the dialogue...I don't know what to say really.

Kill it with fire?