Yes. In fact, I think I read a book about it. Or at least my knowledge of it feels vaguely like I acquired it by reading. Maybe a chapter of a larger book on WWII? Hmm, this is going to bug me for a while.Spade Lead said:Ever heard of "The Bataan Death March?"
I'll just answer this and only this, as the rest of the OP was very preachy and yet not at all cooperative (which is why I didn't participate in the poll).Cap said:Would it be ethical to punish the descendants of those involved for the crimes committed?
He really does. Less than half an hour after this thread was created a new episode of South Park aired that actually briefly referenced Japan's war crimes against China. Wasn't a big part of the episode but OP still has some frightening ninja skills.Genixma said:You sir, live by your forum name it twas not a week ago that I was thinking about this.Cap said:Firstly, before you finish reading this, even this paragraph, I'd like for you to vote in the poll. One of the things I'd really like to bring to light here is the ignorance of western society in this respect. Not ignorance as in stupidity, but ignorance as in lack of knowledge. Anyway, if you'd be so kind as to vote now, that would be great, and now, on with the rest of this topic.
I'm not going to tell you anything about the Chinese Holocaust, but instead ask you to look it up. Just typing in "Chinese Holocaust" or "Nanjing Massacre" should give you a few pages with substantial information.
Dicussion time:
What do you think of the ignorance of this in western society?
-Why do you think that ignorance exists, and what could be done to remedy it?
Do you think Japan should admit to the events that transpired, rather than denying all knowledge of them?
Would it be ethical to punish the descendants of those involved for the crimes committed?
This is something I've been thinking about ever since I saw a documentary about Mao's government. The thing your paragraph brought to mind was how the imprisoned and shamed Mao's second in command (whose name I can't recall) along with his political allies after they did nothing but try to stabilize the population after the huge mess with the Red Guard and then he died alone in that damn prison cell, all for trying to help and get Mao to back off before he screwed everyone over.Melon Hunter said:I would say half the issue is that the ruling party in China is very set against exposing any negative elements of their country; just look at how many political prisoners have been put away in prison for years for speaking out against the Communist Party.
I read into that link. And every person who took part in all that should of been executed after the war. I'm sure some were. It takes alot to disgust me but this did. Japan was fucked up back than.derelict said:If you think that's bad, ought to see what also happened around that time. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731]
People were altogether different back then. Can't really fault anyone today for the world views of the past. Best to just remember and get a move on.
"Yasukuni is a shrine to house the actual souls of the dead as kami, or "spirits/souls" as loosely defined in English. It is believed that all negative or evil acts committed are absolved when enshrinement occurs. This activity is strictly a religious matter since the separation of State Shinto and the Japanese government in 1945. The priesthood at the shrine has complete religious autonomy to decide to whom and how enshrinement may occur. They believe that enshrinement is permanent and irreversible. According to Shinto beliefs, by enshrining kami, Yasukuni Shrine provides a permanent residence for the spirits of those who have fought on behalf of the emperor. Yasukuni has all enshrined kami occupying the same single seat. The shrine is dedicated to give peace and rest to all those enshrined there. It was the only place to which the Emperor of Japan bowed."deadman91 said:And the generals that commanded the massacre still have honored places in the shrine of Japan's war dead. But hey, they were simply trying to rid Asia of Western Imperialism, so it's alright...
That would make no sense. How would you feel about being punished for crime your grandfather did?Cap said:Would it be ethical to punish the descendants of those involved for the crimes committed?