Poll: The New Decade!

Recommended Videos

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
So, I'd like to ask all of you this!

Did your new decade start on January 1st, 2010 or will it begin on January 1st, 2011?

My logic is that it's 2011, as there is no "Year 0" in the Common Era Calendar, and as such, 1-10 is one decade, 11-20 is another.

What say all of you?
 

Who Dares Wins

New member
Dec 26, 2009
749
0
0
I think you're right. From year 2000 to year 2010 there should be aprox. 3650 days, which means 2010 ends, the first decade ends and so on. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 

Nimcha

New member
Dec 6, 2010
2,383
0
0
The previous decade started on January 1st 2000. So by rule, this one started 362 days ago. Approximately.
 

Drakmeire

Elite Member
Jun 27, 2009
2,588
0
41
Country
United States
last year the the end of the decade, you don't say that the 70's ended in 1981.
 

Random Fella

New member
Nov 17, 2010
1,165
0
0
Actually there should have been a year 0
This is because I think the days in-between count as decimal places and the years as ones.
Therefor since centuries are 100 years
0-100
100-200
200-300
etc...
1900-2000
and same with decades
1990-2000
2000-2010
and I didn't use the same year twice because it means the century end the day that year becomes and starts at the day the year becomes. (The decade changing point)
So 2010 was the start of this decade as 2000 was the start of this century not 2001.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
Mackheath said:
No_Remainders said:
MikeOfThunder said:
FargoDog said:
2010. Would you consider 1900 part of the 19th century or the 20th?
20th Century.
But then there's a century with 99 years?
1-100
101-200
201-300
etc
etc
1701-1800
1801-1900
1901-2000
2001-2100
Year 0-100, 100-200, ect.

OT: 2010.
Excuse me? A year 0?

Hold on... What's this? The Common Era Calendar began in year 1. There is no such thing as year 0. It went from 1 BCE (Before Common Era) to 1 CE (Common Era).
 

xDarc

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2009
1,333
0
41
My only hope is people get with the future and start saying twenty eleven instead of two thousand and eleven. The whole new millennium thing is over, you can stop saying two thousand in front of everything.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,607
0
0
Year 0-100.

Of course this is depending on which calendar you use, so I stand with 2010 being the start of the new decade.
 

Blue_vision

Elite Member
Mar 31, 2009
1,276
0
41
If 2000 was the new millennium (and thustly the new decade,) then 2010 would be the new decade, no?
 

Gaz6231

New member
Nov 1, 2010
318
0
0
I think OP knows the answer and is trying to see how many morons inhabit the site.
 

Sneaky Paladin

New member
Jan 21, 2009
1,491
0
0
No_Remainders said:
Mackheath said:
No_Remainders said:
MikeOfThunder said:
FargoDog said:
2010. Would you consider 1900 part of the 19th century or the 20th?
20th Century.
But then there's a century with 99 years?
1-100
101-200
201-300
etc
etc
1701-1800
1801-1900
1901-2000
2001-2100
Year 0-100, 100-200, ect.

OT: 2010.
Excuse me? A year 0?

Hold on... What's this? The Common Era Calendar began in year 1. There is no such thing as year 0. It went from 1 BCE (Before Common Era) to 1 CE (Common Era).
I always thought it worked like birthdays and you aren't 1 year old when your born but you are when you have lived for 1 year
 

Nimcha

New member
Dec 6, 2010
2,383
0
0
Gaz6231 said:
I think OP knows the answer and is trying to see how many morons inhabit the site.
And being horribly obnoxious about it.

Honestly, who cares? It's just an arbitrary number that holds no intrisic value, what is the problem if we just agree the very first decade had 99 years?
 

Gaz6231

New member
Nov 1, 2010
318
0
0
Nimcha said:
Gaz6231 said:
I think OP knows the answer and is trying to see how many morons inhabit the site.
And being horribly obnoxious about it.

Honestly, who cares? It's just an arbitrary number that holds no intrisic value, what is the problem if we just agree the very first decade had 99 years?
Oh amen brutha.
 

Aloran

New member
Oct 9, 2008
953
0
0
xDarc said:
My only hope is people get with the future and start saying twenty eleven instead of two thousand and eleven. The whole new millennium thing is over, you can stop saying two thousand in front of everything.
But it is the year 2011?

Two thousand and eleven in number.

Why should we say twenty-eleven? Yes I am aware we say nineteen ninety when referring 1990 but for some reason saying twenty-x as a representative of this century sounds odd to me.
 

Sleekgiant

Redlin5 made my title :c
Jan 21, 2010
12,945
0
0
No_Remainders said:
Excuse me? A year 0?

Hold on... What's this? The Common Era Calendar began in year 1. There is no such thing as year 0. It went from 1 BCE (Before Common Era) to 1 CE (Common Era).
[CITATION NEEDED]


OT: 2011 cuz I'm special