Poll: The world's most relevant question ever
- Thread starter Captain Wes
- Start date
Hm, it appears as though the restartification has failed. Very well then, the restartification of the restartification shall resume tomorrow after I get some sleep so that I can think properly.
Agreed. Be ready with some creative scenarios....I'll be waiting......L1250 post=18.73764.809528 said:
i would defeat zombies and vampires cause by then i'l have transferred my brain into a super robot
except for the crabs i'd be screwed then
on a more serious note i'm going with vampires simply because they are more organized and can team up too survive with eachother and surviving humans
except for the crabs i'd be screwed then
on a more serious note i'm going with vampires simply because they are more organized and can team up too survive with eachother and surviving humans
Okay, restartification ideas time:jamanticus post=18.73764.809537 said:
Re-discussing the established scenario
Vampires vs. zombies in an all-out war with even numbers
Vampires vs. zombies vs. sparkly vampires
Vampires vs. zombies vs. werewolves
Ninja vampires vs. pirate zombies
Ninja vampires vs. pirate zombies vs. robot werewolves.
Any combination of the listed scenarios.
Are these good enough to start with?
A war with even numbers?L1250 post=18.73764.810734 said:
That could actually cripple the vampires. As vampires are solitary and move on their own or in small packs of 3-4 a whole army would turn into chaos. The vampires would have competition from both thousands of zombies and tousands of vampires. A civil war would break out between the vampires as they masacre each other.
While this is happening the zombies would ravish the human population, along with mass vampire feeding. Once the civil war died down (with no real victor but shattered numbers) the vampires would be faced with millions of zombies and a quickly diminishing food source. Forced to live off the blood of other animals the vampires power would be severely drained. The vampires would be forced into using psuedo-guerrilla tactics to whittle the zombie horde down while also gathering human survivors to feed off and breed.
They would need to secure small pockets of land to support the humans and protect them while searching for survivors and trying to cull the zombies horde which, while unorganised, would out number vampires and humans at a rate of atleast 1000:1.
Yes, it would most likely cause problems for the vampires, but that makes it a more interesting scenario, which is the point, really. I also have a new idea: What if there was still a full human population in addition to the undead factions? The humans would most likely try to fight both vampires and zombies and the two groups would also be competing for food, making a very interesting three-way war.Janus Vesta post=18.73764.810918 said:
Okay, for the even numbers scenario... The vampires would certainly have a bit of competition within their ranks, but all of that would soon sort itself out as the most powerful and capable vampires rose to the top and established a complex hierarchy.
Once that happened, though, the zombies would indeed be at the vampires' doorstep.
The vampires would have to all scatter to different locations in order to preserve their undeaths. This would lead to, like Janus Vesta said, guerrilla warfare on the vampires' part. The vampires would pick off zombies with several cool vampire weapons and soon herd the zombies into a small, isolated area. From there, the vampires would drop a wonderful tactical nuclear bomb on the zombies, obliterating them.
EDIT: Now, if the human population was still as large as it is now, like L1250 said, it would really liven things up. The humans could be one of three things to the vampires/zombies:
1: A commodity that both undead sides fight over
2: Allies for the vampires (who would ever want to ally with zombies?!)
3: Enemies of both undead species, trying to preserve the human way of life
If the humans were a commodity, the vampires would most likely, as Amnestic said, corral them and use them for a source of blood before the zombies could lumber over and infect said humans. The vampires could also be incredibly callous and use the humans that they have drained for cannon fodder to fend off the zombies. If the zombies got the humans, however, they would make more zombies, leading to much greater zombie numbers.
I shall discuss the next 2 scenarios in future posts.
(This is really fun! Should we ask a mod to put this in the RP forum?)
Once that happened, though, the zombies would indeed be at the vampires' doorstep.
The vampires would have to all scatter to different locations in order to preserve their undeaths. This would lead to, like Janus Vesta said, guerrilla warfare on the vampires' part. The vampires would pick off zombies with several cool vampire weapons and soon herd the zombies into a small, isolated area. From there, the vampires would drop a wonderful tactical nuclear bomb on the zombies, obliterating them.
EDIT: Now, if the human population was still as large as it is now, like L1250 said, it would really liven things up. The humans could be one of three things to the vampires/zombies:
1: A commodity that both undead sides fight over
2: Allies for the vampires (who would ever want to ally with zombies?!)
3: Enemies of both undead species, trying to preserve the human way of life
If the humans were a commodity, the vampires would most likely, as Amnestic said, corral them and use them for a source of blood before the zombies could lumber over and infect said humans. The vampires could also be incredibly callous and use the humans that they have drained for cannon fodder to fend off the zombies. If the zombies got the humans, however, they would make more zombies, leading to much greater zombie numbers.
I shall discuss the next 2 scenarios in future posts.
(This is really fun! Should we ask a mod to put this in the RP forum?)
Alright, now if the vampires decided to allow the humans to ally with them, I think this is what would ensue:
The humans would quickly be asked for all of their weapons, then the vampires would secure the humans in a heavily fortified vampire fortress to keep them safe from zombies. The vampires would ask for numerous donations of blood from the humans in exchange for protection. Now, with a steady source of willing food (and tons of human weaponry), the vampires would hold off the zombies and destroy them. The zombies, of course, would have very little food, as the humans would be all unavailable to them.
Now, if the humans didn't ally with any side:
Many humans would be eaten or infected by zombies, and many more would be taken by the vampires as a source of blood. The ones with weapons, however, would keep both the vampires and zombies at bay, most likely through the use of air-bombings and strafing runs. In the end, though, I think the humans would ally with the vampires once they realized that they needed undead help to get rid of so many zombies.
After this, the humans and vampires could either decide to go their separate ways, or wage another war to destroy each other.
The humans would quickly be asked for all of their weapons, then the vampires would secure the humans in a heavily fortified vampire fortress to keep them safe from zombies. The vampires would ask for numerous donations of blood from the humans in exchange for protection. Now, with a steady source of willing food (and tons of human weaponry), the vampires would hold off the zombies and destroy them. The zombies, of course, would have very little food, as the humans would be all unavailable to them.
Now, if the humans didn't ally with any side:
Many humans would be eaten or infected by zombies, and many more would be taken by the vampires as a source of blood. The ones with weapons, however, would keep both the vampires and zombies at bay, most likely through the use of air-bombings and strafing runs. In the end, though, I think the humans would ally with the vampires once they realized that they needed undead help to get rid of so many zombies.
After this, the humans and vampires could either decide to go their separate ways, or wage another war to destroy each other.
Sorry for all of these sequential posts.....L1250 post=18.73764.810734 said:
What are sparkly vampires, again? I'm sure you gave an explanation earlier, but I can't find it anywhere.....
Sparkly vampires are vampires from "Twilight". Sunlight doesn't kill them, it just makes them sparkle. I added it just so that the "Twilight" haters could have some additional amusement.
Ah, I see..... They sound like interesting candidates for annihilation by zombies.L1250 post=18.73764.812370 said:
So, now onto vampires vs zombies vs sparkly vampires?
Very well, afterwards I suggest we choose one scenario to discuss in depth until we reach a conclusion, choose another one, and repeat.jamanticus post=18.73764.812388 said:
For vampires vs. zombies vs. sparkly vampires, I assume it will happen like this: The sparkly vampires, aware of their own inferiority, decide to ally with the cool vampires. They will soon think that the zombies will expect an attack least during broad daylight (they wouldn't understand that zombies can't think). They will attempt to stealthily approach the zombies and surprise attack them, but the zombies will be attracted to the sparkles and brutally murder them. The vampires will briefly applaud the zombies for removing them and resume the war.