Poll: Twilight BOOK Series

Recommended Videos

Poofs

New member
Nov 16, 2009
591
0
0
This thread is about the Twilight book series not the shitty movie of the same name
Now you have 2 options here
1.)If you are a fan of the Series post your favorite charachter and book and why

2.)If you dont like the series post the reason why you dont like it.
and make sure its a good reason not just "Twilights for Fags" or "It ruined vampires" give a real reason go for it.

Edit: I know there is a thread on the front page about Twilight but that thread is about Twilight ruining Vampire culture and i just wanted your guys opinions of the series

Alsoi just as a side-note i am a guy who isnt gay and i like twilight
 

ArcWinter

New member
May 9, 2009
1,013
0
0
Well, I read it before it was popular, which was when I was maybe 10. Even then, I realized it wasn't that good. The reason people don't like it isn't because of how bad it is (it's completely average), it's just how overrated it is.

Compared to the best book ever, it is about 1/120th of the quality.
 

Grayjack

New member
Jan 22, 2009
3,133
0
0
I read one chapter of the first book before putting it down. The content was just embarrassing.
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
This is going to end well. IBTL, and all that.

Also, there's already a thread on Twilight on the first page.
 

messy

New member
Dec 3, 2008
2,057
0
0
I read all four of them (If I finish then I'll end it) - I'm a guy btw and the worrying thing is I've read them but the girlfriend hasn't...

Basically four novels of Edward being described in various degrees of attractiveness. Bella being mopy for no reason what so ever, and Edward saying stuff like "I'm no good for you/I'll crush you between my gorgeous thighs." No.3 has the highlight of the only vamp on vamp fight we actually get to see.

And no.4 sets up for a massive vamp vs vamp battle which is solved diplomatically. These books are the definition of anti-climatic

Essentially just (apologise fort the crude imagery) masturbation material for the girl in the class who feels she's all misunderstood soo different
 

Mr. Grey

I changed my face, ya like it?
Aug 31, 2009
1,616
0
0
I read 17 pages and was filled with rage... so I guess I... hated it? Maybe?

I'll go with what Stephen King said, and not because I liked his book Bag of Bones. I can't quote him because my memory is awful and I stopped caring about Twilight. Which is weird because I couldn't stop complaining about it, got it out of my system I guess.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,637
0
0
I read about half way through the first one (Twilight), then put it down, in a shredder.


It's... ok, but completely forgettable. It's probably one the very few massively successful books that reads like it's own fan fiction combined with victorian era soft erotica. There's nothing especially wrong with it, it's just dull and instantly forgettable. I can't really remember any of it and it's only nine months since I (partially) read it. I do remember that it's unapolegtically written for teenage girls and no-one else.

They'll sell well now, but in ten years time, probably less it'll be largely gone and forgotten. It's not going to last in the same way that Harry Potter and His Dark Materials probably will. It's too blah.
 

Gxas

New member
Sep 4, 2008
3,187
0
0
I enjoyed the books. I'm a guy and actually had just finished reading "'Salem's Lot" when I started the series. Maybe that's why I don't give a shit about how Twilight "ruined" the mythos of vampires. I mean, I had fun reading them.
 

Charles-mcdashin

New member
Nov 18, 2009
3
0
0
i've just heard of twilight, and seen one trailer, all i can say is that is the twilight vampires, the same way i look at vampires in soul reaver. i just judge a fictional race by how a series makes them, and it doesnt ruin one of the other vampire types anyway.
 

_Janny_

New member
Mar 6, 2008
1,193
0
0
I just read a couple of chapters with the idea of playing the infamous Twilight Drinking Game. But I couldn't make it too far before I choked on my drink because of all the laughing. Those books are hilariously bad.
 

MikeOfThunder

New member
Jul 11, 2009
436
0
0
Lol, I loved them to be honest.

Thought they were really interesting. Read all four of the books and found the characters entertaining. Too be a guy and to love twilight, you may think faggoty- well i don't really care to be honest, had enough spite off my friends.

Alice Cullen For The Win. Best character.

3rd Book 'Eclipse' was the greatest out of the four, due to the building tension towards the final battle.

-Lmao for being the only person to like them-
 
Jan 11, 2009
1,236
0
0
I'm a guy and I liked all of the books, but the end of Breaking Dawn was a massive kick in the balls. Especially since I was looking forward to the character being played by Dakota Fanning being brutally murdered.
 

messy

New member
Dec 3, 2008
2,057
0
0
Jannycats said:
I just read a couple of chapters with the idea of playing the infamous Twilight Drinking Game. But I couldn't make it too far before I choked on my drink because of all the laughing. Those books are hilariously bad.
ahh that was is particularly nasty. (the drinking game that is)
 

Wayte

New member
Oct 21, 2009
520
0
0
I dislike the books because it's a terrible romance. Bella is completely shallow; Within 30 pages she turns down 3 perfectly good guys. But as soon as "stunning and exciting" Edward gives her a look, she's obsessed. And it's not like its a character flaw she works on, no. We're just expected to accept that this is a good romance, when in fact. it's just a novelization of classic female stupidity.
 

w-Jinksy

New member
May 30, 2009
961
0
0
i promised my freind i'd read all of twilight to prove him wrong that it isnt terrible,it was i smacked him round the face for acting like its a golden branch from odins hand.
 

Sleipnir

New member
Oct 17, 2009
93
0
0
I'm going to be civil about this, I am not a fan of Twilight, the story sounded interesting at first, a few friends at college were talking about it before it got outrageously popular, I said "what is this vampire book you speak of?" and "from the sounds of things I prefer the werewolf..." I started reading the first book and had to put it down after a few chapters but got a summary from a Twihard friend of mine.

The Writing
The writing is average at best, I'd rather class it as poor. The style of writing is boring and lacking, the tone Bella uses is monotonous and depressing, mind numbingly so. The lexis is verging on dead, especially adjectives regarding Edward, it's the same thing over and over and is just so tedious it physically hurt to read it. It was something akin to a badly written fanfic, I was surprised there were no glaringly bad spelling errors in what I read.

The Characters
The characters are lacking in depth, those who are more obscure have deeper personalities than the main characters. Bella is a boring girl who whines relentlessly about not liking a place, she thinks she isn't pretty, she's thinks she isn't smart, she is Mary-Sue kind of clumsy, you know the type, she does something stupid and accidental, if it was a super hero story she'd accidentally save the world from a nuclear missile hidden in her school or something equally bizarre.
Edward is "perfect", if you can consider someone who at one point is disgusted by Bella, and then a half-arc later is practically trying to mount her and declaring his love for her "perfect". He is just as monotone as Bella and thinks he's a monster, I want to call this backwards Frankenstein's Monster syndrome, as he needs to be convinced by someone he at least has urges to kill that he isn't a monster (grammar failed somewhere in that sentence). How that relates to Frankenstein's Monster is the monster went from "but I want to be normal" to "you all think I'm a monster so I'm going to be one", now reverse that and chuck some glitter at the monster and you've got Edward, albeit lumpy and not as grumpy.

The Story
It's lacking in direct plot, in fact, the actual plot doesn't come into the story until about 2/3 of the way in, and then it only lasts for a few chapters before everything is as boring and seemingly normal as possible. This occurs in most if not all of the books I believe.
Over all, not much to say on the story, it's just not that much of a story.

The Sub-Content
It romanticises all of the wrong things, stalking and vague paedophilia are the ones I believe stand out too much.
Stalking: if you think it's romantic for Edward to show up to save Bella every 20 seconds, that's fine, if you think it's romantic and normal for Edward to follow her around covertly then sit in her room and gawp at her whilst she's sleeping, you might want to seek professional help or look at the context in which you are romanticising this.
Paedophilia: Jacob... oh Jacob... He cannot have Bella, so he settles for the next best thing, imprinting on her child, acting all fatherly or brotherly or something towards her, that's okay, that's fine, but waiting for it to prematurely age and be a teenager when she's still a hell spawn mutant baby thing, then making a move on her, that is not fine, that is nasty and wrong on so many levels, yet so many can't see that.

I suppose really my issues with the "romanticism" are somewhat out of context, but they are still there... Oh but there is more on the dodgy moral values of SMeyer and her characters, I just can't remember them as I haven't actually talked about the books and my indepth issues with them in quite a while...

Edit
I'm a guy, I'm gay, I'm still a teen (barely... 20 soon = do not want), I generally like reading, I just can't stand Twilight. The hype didn't help.