Poll: Views on Gearbox?

William Dickbringer

New member
Feb 16, 2010
1,426
0
0
well seeing as I never spent the full $60 on duke nukem forever and bought balls of steel edition for only $22 (hey $20 for the bust of duke nukem and extra stuff and $2 for the game is pretty good deal)
although learning somethings cut out of the game or things in the comic book that would have been cool in the game (female duke nukem as a sidekick, frickin mutant sharks with frickin laser beams, dr proton(I know I know dlc but I haven't made it to the dlc yet) hell if it was 4 guns, ego meter fix(less duck and cover more like drinking beer heals you or doing something manly like doing a finsher on an enemy), animation fixing, and finally making duke man up more (12 years shouldn't make duke last five seconds in a glory hole and get drunk off one beer) if they fixed those things I would have liked it more
I honestly don't chalk duke nukem forever a bust for them but it's not a plus for them either so I still like them myself
 

Andy Shandy

Fucked if I know
Jun 7, 2010
4,797
0
0
They're great with games that aren't in development hell. So if they avoided that, and maybe somebody managed to keep Randy's mouth shut every once in a while (although I confess that would be a gargantuan task), they'd be fantastic.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
Jandau said:
Gearbox is a fairly common occurrence - an average/mediocre developer who had one good idea. In their case, Borderlands. They stumbled upon a formula that for whatever reason worked, but they can't follow it up because when it comes down to it, they aren't all that good. Not only that, but the good game (and its sequels) build up expectations among the gaming public meaning that their subsequent mediocre work is judged even more harshly...
This...this right here, is how I feel about Gearbox. With only a few minor differences.

For one, I'll admit that I have enjoyed a few of their older games. Both of the Half-Life expansions and Brothers in Arms, for example, were really enjoyable. And, I am a firm "fan" of Borderlands 1. (But only after fixing the PC version with community made patches. Which kinda pissed me off, I must add. And almost made me hate the game.)

However, beyond those, most of what I've played from them has been, to me, anything from moderately decent to just awful. More over, they brag incessantly about how "awesome" they are.

Well, okay. Randy Pitchford does. And, he likes to outright lie to people. Someone should tell him to "clap his trap" once in a while. <.<

It probably doesn't help that I'm still pissed off that I wasted sixty bucks on Borderlands 2. Haven't even finished my first play-through and can't bring myself to go back to it. The writing, story, characters, and dialog are so incredibly juvenile that every time someone starts talking in the game it grates on my nerves. The first games story and characters were bland and juvenile, but at least tolerably so. And the fun of the gameplay and intricacy of the world designs made up for it in spades. The sequel? Not so much. Not to me. Perhaps it gets better later on? I don't know.

(That, and they made their DLC practices even more obnoxious. But whatever, that's more an industry trend then something that's exclusive to Gearbox.)

I liked Gearbox in the past. I want to like them now. I know for a fact they have some really talented people over there. I just think, at a corporate level, they keep screwing up lately. Here's hoping that trend doesn't continue. We really, REALLY don't need another Duke Nukem Forever nor another Aliens: Colonial Marines.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
I liked Borderlands. I liked Borderlands 2. And I liked Colonial Marines.

I didn't like Duke Nukem Forever.

They're above average to me.
 

Poetic Nova

Pulvis Et Umbra Sumus
Jan 24, 2012
1,974
0
0
They should stick to their own IP's, imo still a good company. I like DNF, but ACM should've never be released.
 

JSDodd

New member
Jul 29, 2010
114
0
0
Love them for borderlands. I understand that they pushed out Duke Nukem to get it over and done with and that for legal reasons they needed to get Aliens: Colonial Marines done very quickly. So overall, they're pretty good in my books.
 

Shadow-Phoenix

New member
Mar 22, 2010
2,289
0
0
I voted bad.

I didn't really like Borderlands 2 and how it felt like a grindfest, how you were supposed to play co-op in order to get better loot and overall the level cap annoyed me and after the story the whole game just felt like it was all about the guns and nothing else really.

Then they were given the contract by Sega to make ACM happen 6 years ago and they went and pilfered their money into what made BL1+2 so great so you could say Borderlands was born out of lack of respect and care for Aliens and that disgusts me along with Randy being an obnoxious asshole with the sheer gall to lie through his teeth and not own up to fucking the game over and not really caring about it but his own personal project despite the improtant franchise contract he was given.

So really I'd say gearbox are Bad and lazy, especially since I've seen much better from Platinum and Konami than gearbox will ever hope to achieve.

And after what happened with my favourite franchise (being Aliens) I don't think I'll ever buy a Gearbox game ever again.
 

WickedFire

New member
Apr 25, 2011
126
0
0
Good but Lazy.

It seems they have the capacity to be great, but the management is failing. Not to say that heavy management is good, just look at the plethora of uninspired dull grey-brown modern military shooters there are today. The problem is that Gearbox is at the opposite end of the spectrum. They are far too relaxed on some of their projects.

Considering work on Aliens Colonial Marines had been going for what, 5/6 years? It should have been far better than it was. DNF is a contestable entity, they got it in a nearly done shape, but its hard to polish what was likely a turd. In either case, better management of resources would have allowed them to proceed with the Borderlands franchise without letting the other properties fall by the wayside.
 

Sizzle Montyjing

Pronouns - Slam/Slammed/Slammin'
Apr 5, 2011
2,213
0
0
Blargh McBlargh said:
Loved Borderlands 1 & 2, Duke Nukem Forever was bound to be a complete and utter disaster after 12 years, and never particularly cared about the Alien(s) games, so...

They're still awesome in my book. :)
Agree on Borderlands, those games are just fantastic to me, hopefully though they can add a bit more quest diversity, better loot drop rates and better boss fights which don't involve hiding behind a rock chipping away at their health in the hope that they just might drop something worthwhile.

Also, I feel as if DNF wasn't as bad as everyone was saying, it was bad, yes, but not terrible.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
Zachary Amaranth said:
canadamus_prime said:
Well I can't say that their latest dick move makes me want to trust them in the future.
Which one?

I'm just curious. I agree, for the most part, but it's more a pattern for me than a single point.
The Aliens thing. I'm not aware of any other dick moves. Well I suppose Pitchford (or however you spell his name) didn't exactly respond to the Aliens thing very well either so I guess you could count that too.
It's a funny phenomenon I find that happens these days is that some companies own up to mistakes when they don't need to and others act like dicks when they should own up to their mistakes.
Well, Aliens had a lot of dick moves.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
canadamus_prime said:
Zachary Amaranth said:
canadamus_prime said:
Well I can't say that their latest dick move makes me want to trust them in the future.
Which one?

I'm just curious. I agree, for the most part, but it's more a pattern for me than a single point.
The Aliens thing. I'm not aware of any other dick moves. Well I suppose Pitchford (or however you spell his name) didn't exactly respond to the Aliens thing very well either so I guess you could count that too.
It's a funny phenomenon I find that happens these days is that some companies own up to mistakes when they don't need to and others act like dicks when they should own up to their mistakes.
Well, Aliens had a lot of dick moves.
Well I was mostly talking about the false demo. Of course I haven't played either the demo or the actual game and I'm pretty much going by the word of Jim Sterling here, but unless I'm mistaken I don't think even EA has blatantly falsely represented a game; at least not to my knowledge.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
I used to hear Gearbox and take it on faith that they would probably make a great game. Loved Opposing Force, loved Brothers in Arms, loved both Borderlands. I dismissed DNF as a fluke, and more a matter of them just deciding to finish the damn thing then really show there skills. Now Aliens has bombed dramatically and, well...I don't give them the benefit of the doubt anymore. If they make a game, Ill look at it, consider it, and wait for reviews, and I may very well buy it, but I can't take quality in their games on faith anymore. They could make me assume the best from them again, but it will take a couple of excellent games/PR moves to get back on the list of devs that I give benefit of the doubt to.

I still like them generally, but my trust is no longer assured.
 

kasperbbs

New member
Dec 27, 2009
1,855
0
0
I'm not interested in borderlands, but i liked brothers in arms and i have absolutely no interest in colonial marines or duke nukem, so i guess below average?
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Borderlands is polarizing around these parts. Either you love it or you hate it.
I happen to love it; it's one of the few GOOD LAN-able games remaining and I haven't had any crippling problems with my PC port from Day 1 of either game (though the bugged skills in BL1 were annoying to say the least).

That said, 2K Games needs to stop letting Gearbox pick up doomed products.
Duke Nukem Forever, Aliens: Colonial Marines? Did a series of impressive/funny tech demos that did not represent the final product at all. Both games had an unnaturally long development Hell, and it was clear they weren't going to shake out.

Result: Two black eyes and a lot of lost good will.
 

mammothbroncho

New member
Jun 29, 2012
24
0
0
Eh, I liked Borderlands 1 and 2 haven't played any of their other games though. They honestly just need to stop picking up games like DNF that have been in development hell forever. Also they should have scrapped Colonial Marines since they had to ask for extensions so many times. So I vote average.
 

dreadedcandiru99

New member
Apr 13, 2009
893
0
0
I never played either of the Borderlands games because I was told that those are all about the multiplayer, and I don't do multiplayer games for the same reason I don't read multireader books.

I almost got Duke Nukem Forever, but a coworker warned me off at the last minute. Judging from what I saw of it after it came out, that was probably for the best.

The only Gearbox game I've played is Colonial Marines, and I was obligated to go through the whole thing, since I got it in my head to make a YouTube playthrough of it. Otherwise, I'd have quit after an hour or so, because it was one of the shittiest gaming experiences of my life.

In short, Gearbox? Meh.