Aye, a decent series like Rome or Battlestar Galactica could work quite well for WH40k, just choosing a good protagonist like an Inquisitor would really help to showcase to sheer variety and scale of the 40k universe.Saskwach said:The 40k universe is too different to our own that it could be done like a standard action movie. The Imperium and its people have a mindset too alien to humanity today - or at least movie-watching humanity. It'd need a treatment like Deadwood or Rome (the HBO series) - finding the humanity in a hugely different culture, but not shirking from what's different. Only then could a good 40k movie be made.
Personally, I dislike BSG, but I agree with what you're saying. An Inquisitor is one of the better entry points for total setting noobs, since the bigger conundrums of the Imperium - why are we so fanatical? Is there a better way? What's so bad about Chaos anyway? - are addressed quite directly by Inquisitors - and with more ideological room to maneuver, since Inquisitors can get away with not being batshit bonkers. In other words, though nothing is impossible, a light Puritan (hell even a heavy one if you did it right) or a Radical Inquisitor can be made immediately sympathetic in a way much of the rest of 40k's cast of scoundrels can't. Still, there's a lot of on-the-ground commoners and soldiers who could do the trick too, but then you'd have the problem of making the movie about the wider 40k.Candrian said:Aye, a decent series like Rome or Battlestar Galactica could work quite well for WH40k, just choosing a good protagonist like an Inquisitor would really help to showcase to sheer variety and scale of the 40k universe.Saskwach said:The 40k universe is too different to our own that it could be done like a standard action movie. The Imperium and its people have a mindset too alien to humanity today - or at least movie-watching humanity. It'd need a treatment like Deadwood or Rome (the HBO series) - finding the humanity in a hugely different culture, but not shirking from what's different. Only then could a good 40k movie be made.
I don't think it would be the only possible way to adapt WH40k, Sci-fi films have been throwing audiences in to the deep end of their lore for ages.
This. I can't help but get the feeling that Eisenhorn was written to be like a Hollywood-style trilogy anyway, so making a film series of it would be AWESOME.Son of Makuta said:Eisenhorn: the Movie. Please?
Comic book movies takes your arguement and smashes it into little bits. I don't read comics. I love the Marvel/DC movies. I have never played Warhammer 40k, but I would love to see a movie about it.Asehujiko said:Let's see, requires gigantic ammounts of CGI to make everything look even remotely decent, setting is unmarketable exept to the core audience and said core audience will boycott it anyway because of a single misinterpreted scene in the trailer.
Not going to bother.
No idea when those were made but was likely in the period before GW really got its game on! It's cross media efforts hampered by low budgets and awful games like 'Rites of War'.Chipperz said:This. I can't help but get the feeling that Eisenhorn was written to be like a Hollywood-style trilogy anyway, so making a film series of it would be AWESOME.Son of Makuta said:Eisenhorn: the Movie. Please?
Also, there is a short live-action film that was sanctioned by Games Workshop a while back. By a while, I'm talking at least a decade ago. In fact, you can see it for yourself! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFrdBubVT78]