Poll: What apocalypse do you choose?
- Thread starter OneOfTheMichael's
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I choose nuclear apocalypse, because then I can die quickly and not suffer.
Personally, I don't really want to be ripped apart by zombies or aliens. =D
Personally, I don't really want to be ripped apart by zombies or aliens. =D
Zombie: You can deal with zombies, even in a level four outbreak scenario civilization will exist in some shape or another, drastically reduced human populations will exist off of subsistence farming, governments, with their elite troops and equipment, will carve out safe zones free of the undead, and slowly their conquests will expand. Very few cities will thrive in this era, those that manage to be purged will quickly be repopulated, and soon become the walled fortresses of civilization, slowly the purge will begin or the undead themselves will fade away and civilization will rebuild.
Nuclear: Zero survivability period, anyone who doesn't die of radiation poisoning or the blasts themselves will find themselves in a world with irradiated infertile soil, fertility rates will plummet from radiation-induced sterility, any and every piece of fertile land that survives will be fought over like scraps of meat by animals and the conventional weapons of war that found themselves unused in the five-minute conflict will be used by whatever's left of the world's governments. Humanity dies slowly and by the numbers, let's not and say we did.
Disaster: World and human society as we know it is destroyed in a global cataclysm, terrible survivability rate. If the developed world survives it will barely be able to pick up the pieces, the developing world will descend into complete and total savagery from all the devastation, all the up-and-coming nations of the world will be cut down before they had a chance to grow into something powerful.
Alien: Enemy more technologically advanced and/or powerful than us (if you were to go for non-advanced entities like xenomorphs) with either unbeatable technological power or high rate of infection (god help us all if it's the Thing from John Carpenter's film). Low survivability, do not want.
Nuclear: Zero survivability period, anyone who doesn't die of radiation poisoning or the blasts themselves will find themselves in a world with irradiated infertile soil, fertility rates will plummet from radiation-induced sterility, any and every piece of fertile land that survives will be fought over like scraps of meat by animals and the conventional weapons of war that found themselves unused in the five-minute conflict will be used by whatever's left of the world's governments. Humanity dies slowly and by the numbers, let's not and say we did.
Disaster: World and human society as we know it is destroyed in a global cataclysm, terrible survivability rate. If the developed world survives it will barely be able to pick up the pieces, the developing world will descend into complete and total savagery from all the devastation, all the up-and-coming nations of the world will be cut down before they had a chance to grow into something powerful.
Alien: Enemy more technologically advanced and/or powerful than us (if you were to go for non-advanced entities like xenomorphs) with either unbeatable technological power or high rate of infection (god help us all if it's the Thing from John Carpenter's film). Low survivability, do not want.
I want an apocalypse where people just flip out and kill each other without no good reason.
No wars, no viruses, no extra terestials, nothing. Just a world wide fist brawl...
No wars, no viruses, no extra terestials, nothing. Just a world wide fist brawl...
From you actually. You said it in a post when some guy said you had bad taste for liking fallout.ultimateownage said:
Wait, you listened to what I said? I was just making shit up to see his reaction. I'm amazed he believed me. Although that being said, I don't love fallout, I just like it greatly. There are far better games.Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
I choose zombie apocalypse. I've been preparing my whole live for this. I even have some ink ribbons stored up.
Zombie. Then I might actually be able to help with the fucking up of the shit.
That and I've been waiting for one for years.
That and I've been waiting for one for years.
Zombie.
As a geek and a medical student, I feel I am most equipped to face down an apocalypse of the undead variety.
As a geek and a medical student, I feel I am most equipped to face down an apocalypse of the undead variety.
I'd choose a zombie apocalypse because it would be the easiest to survive.
http://www.cracked.com/article_18683_7-scientific-reasons-zombie-outbreak-would-fail-quickly.html
Cracked.com said so.
http://www.cracked.com/article_18683_7-scientific-reasons-zombie-outbreak-would-fail-quickly.html
Cracked.com said so.
Nuclear Apocalypse.
Perosbally, I think it'd be pretty fun to face a struggle to survive a post-nuclear wasteland, Fallout Style.
I'd like to be like the Lone Wanderer, assuming he canonally takes the Good Karma route, I'd do good deeds, save lives, murder any slaver within range of my guns, explore the Wasteland with just my trusty dog on my side and a well-made assault rifle in hand.
Perosbally, I think it'd be pretty fun to face a struggle to survive a post-nuclear wasteland, Fallout Style.
I'd like to be like the Lone Wanderer, assuming he canonally takes the Good Karma route, I'd do good deeds, save lives, murder any slaver within range of my guns, explore the Wasteland with just my trusty dog on my side and a well-made assault rifle in hand.