I liked most of what I saw. The games, however sexy looking, didn't really show me anything that I haven't already seen gameplay wise. It's extremely early, of course, but I'm not seeing much that's next gen other than the graphics.
Graphics are reaching a plateau around about now (as in, current PC tech), like i can't see how games will look vastly better than crysis 3 PC (very high) does. But youtube videos hit a plateau of showing what games can look like with current gen consoles. Which is why 'PC doesn't look any different' to people who don't own a PC capable of 1080p gaming. Youtube videos are blurry at best, and ill suited to anything more than 720p - even the 1080p videos are poor representations of the details in games like Crysis 3.Nocturnus said:Alright... in simplicity: No, Graphics are not reaching a Plateau.Aiddon said:...Okay, all that technical jargon you just spouted, you just wasted your time because I have NO CLUE WHAT YOU JUST SAID. It literally came off like hearing the trumpet-voiced adults in Peanuts All the stuff they showed like Deep Down, Killzone 4, and Infamous 3, yeah, it was an improvement over what the PS3 can do, but it wasn't as big a leap as the PS2 was to the PS3. And thank freaking Buddha for that because it means graphics are finally reaching a plateauNocturnus said:That's because they were demonstrating current gen games.
The Playstation 3 is using the equivalent of a 7 Series GeForce Card, a Single Core Processor, and 256 MB System Memory with 256 MB of Graphics Memory.
The Playstation 4? Is using the equivalency of a mid-range 6 series GeForce (like the GeForce 660) (Yes... that's 9 full graphics processors ahead of its predecessor), a Six Core processor that is leaps and bounds faster than the PS3, and 8 Gigs of Physical System Memory.
The difference is HUGE, and they didn't do a very good job of demonstrating how good games can look on a system like that, and how fluid those good looking games can possibly run. And all that crammed into a package that is likely to sell for less than 500 bucks.
And I wouldn't be so sure about the console's background processes. Windows, for example, when idle runs at 1 gig of system memory, and consoles have historically used less, because really all they do is play games. Even with an app that ties to say... Facebook, if it isn't plugged into an operating system like Windows (which it won't be), it won't use more than one hundred megabytes of system memory.
Considering that they're planning on putting an engine like Unreal 4 on the thing... which is an AMAZING engine... that's going to take a lot of processing power,and this system looks ready to handle it. Which is awesome at the price point.
You can YouTube Unreal 4's technical demos, many of which are not pre-rendered cinematics, and look really really neat, and all of which would turn the Playstation 3 into a smoldering pile of ash in even attempting to render it.
Yes, but only if you buy/rent them again.robert022614 said:Can it play ps3 games? Was meh for me. I mean im excited and probably going to buy it, but this event just wasnt that great. Also that square enix vid is pretty old too
I watched that on this site quite awhile ago.