ywPankeyman said:Thanks. But despite the jacked Def, having max 5 Hp and giving my enemies a ton of Exp when dieing isn't all that great...eelel said:fair enuff btw I like your aviPankeyman said:(crap, what do I say?)eelel said:What is the diferance between a journey and a story?Pankeyman said:Actually FF isn't very popular in Japan, not as much as Dragon Quest (which isn't very popular here.)eelel said:They will stop when it stops making money over in Japan.
So...
Dragon Quest: Big in Japan, not USA.
FF: Big in USA, not Japan.
Personally I prefer Dragon Quest since it's more about the journey (quest) than the story.
I guess journey as in through most of the DQ games you have a rough guess who the bad-guy is and the game builds on that suspense, wheras in FF it's just a spiraling series of events (it can often get convoluted too). The only FF I ever really cared for was VI, it's truly amazing. The rest are'nt personally that great, I've always liked EarthBound and DQ better.
Change just for change's sake usually pisses off the people who like it as it is. Plus, it's not like FF hasn't changed their combat system--yes, it's always turn-based, but they have changed the rules of the turn-based system a lot. You can't even try to tell me the turn based system in FF 3 is anything like the one in FF10 or FF12, and FF13 is doing it in a different way as well.About To Crash said:I realize that there are reasons people do play Final Fantasy games and will for what I estimate is a long time. See, I have this wild notion that, if you're making a series of games so successful that it's lasted through most consoles, then there should be some sort of obligation to mix it up. And yeah, it might fail horribly if Final Fantasy XVIII was what I asked for, but something tells me SquareEnix can afford it.yeah_so_no said:That would be a terrible idea and I hope they never do it.
People who play and love Final Fantasy games are in it for the stories and who like the turn-based battle system. Having detailed and intricate plots is counter to exploratory games (and personally, I'm not fond of exploratory games because I want to know where I'm supposed to go and what I'm supposed to do--I play JPRGs for a reason, after all), and not everyone likes real time. You basically want FF to...not be FF anymore.
If FF turned into what you wanted, I would never touch FF again, and I love FF.
And there will always be JRPGs.
No, that's Patrick Bateman from 'Amercan Psycho'.stinkychops said:So next tuesday. Is that taxidriver as your avatar?matnatz said:When NASA blow up the moon.
Mainly because I think Naruto is utter drivel, and has gone on far too long. My lack of opinion on the other two excluded them by default. Plus humour doesn't have to be factual.Onmi said:Why Naruto? not only is Detective Conan and One Piece more POPULAR in japan they have both been out much longer (And One Piece has LESS filler) After all One Piece was the one that broke records set by Dragon Ball and other shonen series, if anything thats more appropriate.Charley said:There's actually a formula for this - it's
((Sonic + 1) x (Mario + Pokemon)) x Episodes of Naruto
You racist.The_General said:Final Fantasy will never stop unless the US finishes the job it began with Hiroshima and Nagasaki. XD