Poll: When was Duke Nukem actually sexist?

VaudevillianVeteran

No Comment Necessary.
Sep 19, 2009
54,592
0
0
He is a over-exaggerated character who attracts hot women (Mostly strippers and the like) like a hot meal on a porch attracts stray cats. He loves nothing more than blowing shit up, being a badass and getting it on with woman. And we do no judge him because we're not supposed to take him seriously. Apparently some people forget that last bit.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
vehystrix said:
Yeah, they're portrayed as objects, but to the duke everything is an instrument to satisfy his needs. Women can do this in a sexual way, guns can do this in an arse kicking way, etc. He's so egocentric it all revolves around him. It's not sexist, it'd be sexist if only women were objectified, but everything is objectified to the duke, so there's no discrimination...
I voted yes, but this point made me want to take it back. You've convinced me I was wrong.
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
The Duke is NOT a sexist, he IS however most definately a hedonist, if it's not stroking his... ego he simply doesn't care about it.

I can't vouch for the latest game of course but in every game so far he's simply been a man that loves himself, anything else only matters to him if it benefits him in some way.
 

PlasmaFrog

New member
Feb 2, 2009
645
0
0
Yes, but for satirical reasons.

Of course, as with anything that displays some form of male dominance, women are always displayed as objects of interest and nothing more.
 

ryo02

New member
Oct 8, 2007
819
0
0
women like sex too and Duke never forces women to do anything.

he's an exagerated stereo type if anything the game is sexist to men.
 

RedEyesBlackGamer

The Killjoy Detective returns!
Jan 23, 2011
4,701
0
0
DJDarque said:
The people who claim he's sexist are the same kind of people who are outraged when they read A Modest Proposal. He is a satirical character. He was created to play the macho action hero character to such an extreme specifically to make fun of it.
This. He is the embodiment of the cheesy, over-the-top 80's action hero. Him acting this way is intentional.
 

MaxwellEdison

New member
Sep 30, 2010
732
0
0
If you're asking, is DN the character sexist? Yes.
If you're asking, is DN the game sexist? No, it's satire.
 

loodmoney

New member
Apr 25, 2011
179
0
0
Vrex360 said:
Look I'm saying it right now, a gametype called 'Capture the babe' in which the woman is reduced to literally an object used only to earn points and of whom is tied up and you pick up and slap on the rear when she 'freaks out' is not a positive image to present to the mainstream media.
Excellent post, and you make your point really well, but just one thing bothers me:
I really don't approve and am actually more inclined to agree with the feminists then the gamers on this one.
In many cases, feminists and gamers are one and the same. The only reason I bring this up is that too many people seem to be under the impression that feminists are some mysterious group that lurks, out there, hating men/gamers and trying to ruin their fun. Which is total nonsense, obviously.
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
DJDarque said:
The people who claim he's sexist are the same kind of people who are outraged when they read A Modest Proposal. He is a satirical character. He was created to play the macho action hero character to such an extreme specifically to make fun of it.
This. He is the embodiment of the cheesy, over-the-top 80's action hero. Him acting this way is intentional.
MaxwellEdison said:
If you're asking, is DN the character sexist? Yes.
If you're asking, is DN the game sexist? No, it's satire.
"Satire" is more than a word that you stick on something to make it forgivable. I'm going to go ahead and quote myself here:
loodmoney said:
"Starting with satire: for something to be satire it must mock it's subject matter in an attempt at social criticism. Nothing about the game information so far shows this criticism. This game does not ridicule sexism." Satire, and by extention irony, must have a point. The point of "A Modest Proposal" [http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html], for example, is to mock attitudes towards the poor, and to make a point about Britain's policy towards Ireland. Duke Nukem Forever does not make any point.
Unless, of course, you are suggesting that Duke Nukem Forever is in fact trying to get us to laugh at, reject, or feel disgusted by sexism. But I'm not convinced.
 

MaxwellEdison

New member
Sep 30, 2010
732
0
0
loodmoney said:
Unless, of course, you are suggesting that Duke Nukem Forever is in fact trying to get us to laugh at, reject, or feel disgusted by sexism. But I'm not convinced.
I'm claiming that it's getting us to laugh at the over-the-top macho action hero, who is usually sexist. I'm a bit confused about you not seeing that in the game.
 

dunnace

New member
Oct 10, 2008
267
0
0
What I find more interesting is that Duke Nukem's sexism has to be a bad thing. Why can't we enjoy fantasising about being sexist? I get to be murderer, a psychopath, a government tool, a caged fighter but the moment I get to play as a character that likes sex this is suddenly a bad thing.

I know I will never be that objectifying of women, I couldn't bear to keep it up for more than 30 minutes, but in a virtual game where I'm doing some escapism it sure as hell looks fun to be that stupid without consequence.

It's also worth noting Duke has never mentioned anything about women being inferior in any way. It's not like he thinks they're stupid or not entitled to as many rights as men. It's just he sees everyone as inferior to him. Sexism only works as an imbalance of gender, Duke is an imbalance of nature as a whole.
 

pdgeorge

New member
Dec 25, 2008
244
0
0
Proof he is the closest thing we've had to a truly chivalrous male for ages (including his long time where he's been away):
1) He will do whatever it takes to save a woman's life, no matter how dangerous it is.
2) He values the safety of women over his own life. If it means killing hordes of alien pig-men so that they can't/won't mess with his women again then so be it.
3) He does it all indiscriminately. He doesn't do it for a girl he's fallen in love with, a girl he's banged or even a girl he once saw across a bar three years ago and it was a chance encounter and he needs to save her. No. ANY woman is in danger, he will help. Even if it's alien women from another dimension (or whatever was the case in 'land of the babes') he will do anything it takes to save them and protect them.

Does he enjoy a lap dance etc. from the women? Maybe. Does he enjoy the company of women more then men? Maybe.
He treats women differently to men because they not only are different, but they also can offer Duke things that men can't offer him.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
Zaik said:
You see this claim a lot, but it pretty much reeks of "I heard it on the internet so it must be true" syndrome. It's probably the first time Fox News has ever been taken seriously on anything they've said by the internet ever.

So, having never actually seen even so much as a kitchen joke out of him, I'm genuinely curious.

Also, to go ahead and clear out some near misses, strippers, prostitutes, and women who are portrayed actually enjoying sex, don't really count as sexism, regardless of what the Vatican says.
It's rare to find feminists and the Vatican/Fox News raising the same objections to a work of art (used here rather loosely). The latter rely on outdated ideals, specifically traditional gender roles, to further their own agenda (power/money, respectively).

This is from Collins English Dictionary. I included the first 2 definitions which didn't relate to sexism (and are more archaic), lest someone accuse me of cherrypicking from the source. For more details, you can just look up chauvinism at dictionary.com.

1. aggressive or fanatical patriotism; jingoism
2. enthusiastic devotion to a cause
3. smug irrational belief in the superiority of one's own race, party, sex, etc: male chauvinism

I don't remember which of the FPS Dukes I played in the early 90's, but the only portrayal of women were in posters for such porn movies as Sister Act 2 and as strippers, whom you could approach and make it rain on by pressing the "open door" button, at which point Duke would say "shake it, baby." This fits exactly the definition of male chauvinism above. Obviously, to some degree it was meant as humor.

So let's talk about comedy, shall we? Comedic elements of games like this one are always defended with the argument that "It's not sexism, it's just a joke," as though the two are somehow mutually exclusive. That's not a very thoughtful argument, and usually when the defense of something isn't thoughtful that tells me that said defense was designed to shut down the thought processes that might otherwise allow some justified criticism in. This isn't always true, of course, and I have heard some much better formed arguments in Duke's defense, but so far all of them have been free speech arguments (and I agree). I wouldn't put any of Duke's writers on the level of David Cross or Dylan Moran, so let's not pretend they are master comedians. They are game designers, and if we're talking about "the early days" then we're talking about a time when most gamers were adolescents and younger. So I find it hard to believe that "shake it baby" was meant as a joke and nothing more. The titillation was meant to excite our young minds so that they could sell a product that, gameplay wise, was maybe as good as Rise of the Triad and wasn't nearly as good as Doom. This is still happening today. Remember when EA marketed (was it Dante?) with commercials stating that "Your mom will hate it!"

Actual professional comedians know how to pull off something like satire. We have a great wealth of material to use when providing a frame of reference any time someone says that screwing a hooker and then running her over with your car in Grand Theft Auto qualifies as satire. Here's a great example. I'm watching this right now (only the first few minutes are really pertinent).

http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/mon-may-2-2011-francis-fukuyama

For those unfamiliar with Stephen it may seem as if this is nothing more than him enjoying the death of bin Ladin. And he has stated that he does agree to an extent with some of the things his character says. But if you've watched the show before you know what he's up to, particularly when he throws his "bin Ladin's dead" party, and the balloons come down, covered in nine years of dust, and he pulls out a moldy cake from 2002 with a reference to a defunct gameshow and a simulacrum of an old Martin Lawrence joke by way of a thieving beer commercial joke (Wasssssssup!). One of the layers of that bit is him mocking a 10-year-old ideology from which many of us have largely moved on. That is smart satire. Pandering to adolescent, virginal views of women is not satire.

I'm unsure how you find that women portrayed as prostitutes and strippers isn't sexist, or why you coupled it with "women actually enjoying sex." I've never met a hooker, but the strippers I've met (wait, come to think of it, I've met some strippers, so I've probably met a couple of hookers) do not lead me to believe that most of them enjoy sex all that much (they enjoy the Hell out of money and drugs, though). There are some exceptions, but if you think the average porn star really really loves sex then you and I should talk. I haven't played every Duke game ever, but I have seen commercials depicting girl-girl action in the new game. Is this what you're referring to? Because most of the women I've dated are bisexual, and I can tell you that a woman getting her lesbian on to impress her guy isn't enjoying sex, at least not nearly as much as a woman getting her lesbian on because she loves women.
 

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
loodmoney said:
There is basically no objective way to say "Hey, this is sexist, not funny!", if the creators of the stuff explicitly mark it as humorous. So at it's core the whole problem is circular.

This point is well illustrated in the quoted blog post: There is a section where they deal with irony. And they basically deliver no reason, why Duke Nukem can't be ironic. They just say that it isn't ironic and that it is sexist.
What they actually say is this: "Starting with satire: for something to be satire it must mock it?s subject matter in an attempt at social criticism. Nothing about the game information so far shows this criticism. This game does not ridicule sexism." Satire, and by extention irony, must have a point. The point of "A Modest Proposal" [http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html], for example, is to mock attitudes towards the poor, and to make a point about Britain's policy towards Ireland. Duke Nukem Forever does not make any point.

A side note on the whole objectication thing: Has any of you ladies ever considered how men, especially Duke, is portraied in the game(s)? No? Go look at it.

Duke is a hormone and violence driven Maniac while the other men are at best pigs and at worst incapable sissies.

That is sexism and objectification too. Because, you know, not all men are violent, strong, smoking sex-maniacs. Just as well as not all women are "babes".

At that is the reason why Duke Nukem isn't sexist: Men don't get protrayed anywhere close to realistic. Nobody, nothing gets portrayed realistic.
"Duke's sexism is [not made] irrelevant because he is also a horrific character toward other people. The fact that a character is hurtful towards more than just women does not erase their sexism." Extending this argument, just because other characters in the game are portrayed unrealistically, this doesn't excuse how women are portrayed, viz. according to sexist tropes.
I am able to read, but thank you for the quotes.

As I said, they don't cover my objections, here is why:
The first one talks about Satire. I was talking about Irony. Just because something isn't satire (leaving aside the fact that there is no such thing as an absolute definition of satire), doesn't mean it can't be irony.

They don't make any valid points against DN being irony, other than they don't think it is.
I will quote the part:

If it isn?t satire then perhaps, this game is ironic or simply a joke. If that is the case I point to the fabulous Feminist Frequency post and video regarding over the top uber ironic commercials. There is a transcript of the video on the Feminist Frequency website. The idea is that these campaigns use extremely over the top and ridiculous sexist imagery and we are all supposed to laugh at these images. This discussion can also apply to Duke Nukem. As Anita Sarkeesianso eloquently states in the video:

Some people might try to defend these ads by saying they?re ?making fun of sexism? ironically? somehow. Advertisers must believe that the use of irony distances themselves from male chauvinism but that isn?t the case. While we think we are in on the joke, the reality is they aren?t making fun of or pointing out sexism, they?re doing it.

Remember advertisers have one goal and one goal only and that?s to sell you a product. Everything else, all the jokes, humour and imagery and everything else is to get you to buy it. The easiest way to do this is to use sexist representations that replicates the status quo and doesn?t challenge anything. Marketers love the uber ironic sexist style of advertising because they can use all the racist, sexist misogynist imagery they want and simultaneously distance themselves from it with a little wink and a node.

I recognize that this game will sell. In fact, it will likely sell many copies and make Gearbox a lot of money. But we must realize that it will do so by capitalizing on sexist humor. It banks on people wanting a game that is juvenile and sexist. It expects gamers to enjoy the world of Duke Nukem.
They try to make the point here that DN can't be irony, because it is sexist. Leaving aside this circular argument, one could also read it the following way

"DN is sexist, because it trys to sell stuff, therefore it can't be irony, it plays the stuff straight."

And this argument is bullshit. Because by that logic no form of comercial media could make a crictical comment about anything.
Showing a report on the Holocaust? You are just catering the nazis with nice footage.
Arguing about rape cases? Just providing rapists with ideas.


Regarding the second point:
I was not refering to how he acts towards other people. I agree with the post that being a prick towards others does not justiy being a prick towards women.

However! I was talking about the way Duke is portrayed as whole, not just in the interaction with other people. He is a stereotype, a silly one. Not a positive one. If you'd consider being like Duke a positive thing, then... I don't know... you are a misogynist? But who does that?
 

loodmoney

New member
Apr 25, 2011
179
0
0
Exterminas said:
As I said, they don't cover my objections, here is why:
The first one talks about Satire. I was talking about Irony. Just because something isn't satire (leaving aside the fact that there is no such thing as an absolute definition of satire), doesn't mean it can't be irony.
Irony is a form/feature/tool of satire. To use an analogy, all irony is satire in the same way that all humans are mammals. If something isn't a mammal, it cannot be a human; if something isn't satire, it cannot be irony.

They don't make any valid points against DN being irony, other than they don't think it is.
I will quote the part:

If it isn?t satire then perhaps, this game is ironic or simply a joke. If that is the case I point to the fabulous Feminist Frequency post and video regarding over the top uber ironic commercials. There is a transcript of the video on the Feminist Frequency website. The idea is that these campaigns use extremely over the top and ridiculous sexist imagery and we are all supposed to laugh at these images. This discussion can also apply to Duke Nukem. As Anita Sarkeesianso eloquently states in the video:

Some people might try to defend these ads by saying they?re ?making fun of sexism? ironically? somehow. Advertisers must believe that the use of irony distances themselves from male chauvinism but that isn?t the case. While we think we are in on the joke, the reality is they aren?t making fun of or pointing out sexism, they?re doing it.

Remember advertisers have one goal and one goal only and that?s to sell you a product. Everything else, all the jokes, humour and imagery and everything else is to get you to buy it. The easiest way to do this is to use sexist representations that replicates the status quo and doesn?t challenge anything. Marketers love the uber ironic sexist style of advertising because they can use all the racist, sexist misogynist imagery they want and simultaneously distance themselves from it with a little wink and a node.

I recognize that this game will sell. In fact, it will likely sell many copies and make Gearbox a lot of money. But we must realize that it will do so by capitalizing on sexist humor. It banks on people wanting a game that is juvenile and sexist. It expects gamers to enjoy the world of Duke Nukem.
They try to make the point here that DN can't be irony, because it is sexist. Leaving aside this circular argument, one could also read it the following way

"DN is sexist, because it trys to sell stuff, therefore it can't be irony, it plays the stuff straight."
It is not a circular argument. Remember we are talking about ironic sexism here, not irony simpliciter. Irony is used to imply a meaning other than the strict literal meaning. Something cannot be both sexist and ironically sexist, this would be a contradiction.

And this argument is bullshit. Because by that logic no form of comercial media could make a crictical comment about anything.
Showing a report on the Holocaust? You are just catering the nazis with nice footage.
Arguing about rape cases? Just providing rapists with ideas.
I don't know where this came from or what it means. Care to explain?


I was not refering to how he acts towards other people. I agree with the post that being a prick towards others does not justiy being a prick towards women.

However! I was talking about the way Duke is portrayed as whole, not just in the interaction with other people. He is a stereotype, a silly one. Not a positive one. If you'd consider being like Duke a positive thing, then... I don't know... you are a misogynist? But who does that?
"I think it's been pretty easy. Many imagine that Duke began as a cliche or amalgamation of the prima-facie heroes during a great era for action heroes. Since then, we've sort of witnessed a pussification of our heroes in action movies. They have become complex, emotional characters. Duke, being incredibly one-sided and super badass, now stands out, not as a cliche, but as a unique and fresh character rising through a tide of emo."
Randy Pitchford, apparently [http://news.bigdownload.com/2010/12/28/interview-we-chat-with-gearboxs-randy-pitchford-about-duke-nuk/].
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,077
0
0
Valagetti said:
Because men in games are percieved as gods, like becoming immune to bullets by hiding behind a wall. Tell me how many compentant female characters are there in games? The Boss n' Alyx Vance only spring to mind.
The existence of males is not sexism against women. We're talking about Duke Nukem, not video games as a whole. Go make another thread about video games.
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,077
0
0
funguy2121 said:
Zaik said:
You see this claim a lot, but it pretty much reeks of "I heard it on the internet so it must be true" syndrome. It's probably the first time Fox News has ever been taken seriously on anything they've said by the internet ever.

So, having never actually seen even so much as a kitchen joke out of him, I'm genuinely curious.

Also, to go ahead and clear out some near misses, strippers, prostitutes, and women who are portrayed actually enjoying sex, don't really count as sexism, regardless of what the Vatican says.
It's rare to find feminists and the Vatican/Fox News raising the same objections to a work of art (used here rather loosely). The latter rely on outdated ideals, specifically traditional gender roles, to further their own agenda (power/money, respectively).

This is from Collins English Dictionary. I included the first 2 definitions which didn't relate to sexism (and are more archaic), lest someone accuse me of cherrypicking from the source. For more details, you can just look up chauvinism at dictionary.com.

1. aggressive or fanatical patriotism; jingoism
2. enthusiastic devotion to a cause
3. smug irrational belief in the superiority of one's own race, party, sex, etc: male chauvinism

I don't remember which of the FPS Dukes I played in the early 90's, but the only portrayal of women were in posters for such porn movies as Sister Act 2 and as strippers, whom you could approach and make it rain on by pressing the "open door" button, at which point Duke would say "shake it, baby." This fits exactly the definition of male chauvinism above. Obviously, to some degree it was meant as humor.

So let's talk about comedy, shall we? Comedic elements of games like this one are always defended with the argument that "It's not sexism, it's just a joke," as though the two are somehow mutually exclusive. That's not a very thoughtful argument, and usually when the defense of something isn't thoughtful that tells me that said defense was designed to shut down the thought processes that might otherwise allow some justified criticism in. This isn't always true, of course, and I have heard some much better formed arguments in Duke's defense, but so far all of them have been free speech arguments (and I agree). I wouldn't put any of Duke's writers on the level of David Cross or Dylan Moran, so let's not pretend they are master comedians. They are game designers, and if we're talking about "the early days" then we're talking about a time when most gamers were adolescents and younger. So I find it hard to believe that "shake it baby" was meant as a joke and nothing more. The titillation was meant to excite our young minds so that they could sell a product that, gameplay wise, was maybe as good as Rise of the Triad and wasn't nearly as good as Doom. This is still happening today. Remember when EA marketed (was it Dante?) with commercials stating that "Your mom will hate it!"

Actual professional comedians know how to pull off something like satire. We have a great wealth of material to use when providing a frame of reference any time someone says that screwing a hooker and then running her over with your car in Grand Theft Auto qualifies as satire. Here's a great example. I'm watching this right now (only the first few minutes are really pertinent).

http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/mon-may-2-2011-francis-fukuyama

For those unfamiliar with Stephen it may seem as if this is nothing more than him enjoying the death of bin Ladin. And he has stated that he does agree to an extent with some of the things his character says. But if you've watched the show before you know what he's up to, particularly when he throws his "bin Ladin's dead" party, and the balloons come down, covered in nine years of dust, and he pulls out a moldy cake from 2002 with a reference to a defunct gameshow and a simulacrum of an old Martin Lawrence joke by way of a thieving beer commercial joke (Wasssssssup!). One of the layers of that bit is him mocking a 10-year-old ideology from which many of us have largely moved on. That is smart satire. Pandering to adolescent, virginal views of women is not satire.

I'm unsure how you find that women portrayed as prostitutes and strippers isn't sexist, or why you coupled it with "women actually enjoying sex." I've never met a hooker, but the strippers I've met (wait, come to think of it, I've met some strippers, so I've probably met a couple of hookers) do not lead me to believe that most of them enjoy sex all that much (they enjoy the Hell out of money and drugs, though). There are some exceptions, but if you think the average porn star really really loves sex then you and I should talk. I haven't played every Duke game ever, but I have seen commercials depicting girl-girl action in the new game. Is this what you're referring to? Because most of the women I've dated are bisexual, and I can tell you that a woman getting her lesbian on to impress her guy isn't enjoying sex, at least not nearly as much as a woman getting her lesbian on because she loves women.
Well, it's not sexist because it doesn't portray every woman in the whole world as a stripper or porn star. The idea that strippers and porn movies exist doesn't oppress women in real life, why does it in a video game?

More or less, everything you are saying is reading into something with nothing to read into. Just like you can turn anything into a conspiracy theory if you scrutinize hard enough, you can make anything sexist if you're coming to it just trying to make it sexist.


Also that's likely Duke Nukem 3D.

JackSparrowSucks said:
Art Axiv said:
Can it be "just a game"?
YEAH!
We're so intelligent!
Avoid controversy and dissent by belittling the entire goddam medium and not giving it the respect other, established, mediums have; just so you can be right!

Duke Nukem is fucking sexist, nothing to debate.
Perhaps it's supposed to be ironic, but, if you don't think it's ironic, then it is TOTALLY sexist.
So what you're saying is, You're right because you're right, not because of anything you have to say.
 

Uskis

New member
Apr 21, 2008
264
0
0
DJDarque said:
The people who claim he's sexist are the same kind of people who are outraged when they read A Modest Proposal. He is a satirical character. He was created to play the macho action hero character to such an extreme specifically to make fun of it.
The problem with these characters is that not everyone is in on the joke. I have seen many cases of "ironic" exaggerating that people miss and start taking serious. I'm not talking about the "parents" or "feminists" here, but the men who don't get that he's a joke and think he's un-ironically awesome.

I can enjoy the satirical macho character, but sometimes I feel like the irony they lay on is a bit too thin so the satire is not so obvious. It's really hard to balance satirical macho humor right, and sometimes the irony doesn't work and the character just becomes plain sexist. Sometimes I think the Duke is good satire, sometimes not.
 

Nieroshai

New member
Aug 20, 2009
2,940
0
0
vehystrix said:
Yeah, they're portrayed as objects, but to the duke everything is an instrument to satisfy his needs. Women can do this in a sexual way, guns can do this in an arse kicking way, etc. He's so egocentric it all revolves around him. It's not sexist, it'd be sexist if only women were objectified, but everything is objectified to the duke, so there's no discrimination...
I was about to comment that it was sexist, but this rings true in a way I couldn't have said it. The Duke is an equal opportunity egomaniac, after all.