Poll: which fetish is stranger?

Recommended Videos

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,635
0
0
Corjha said:
Y'know if you combine furry, vore and necro you get...a completely normal person. Someone who likes to eat dead animal.
AH HA HA HA! The weirdness piles up so much that it becomes normal. Although it would be someone who is sexually aroused by eating dead animals, but I'm sure that's out there.
 

Sejs Cube

New member
Jun 16, 2008
432
0
0
Sonic Doctor said:
I hope that last sentence is joke. These are fantasies. Having such a fantasy doesn't make a person horrible.
Waving the flag of moral relativism is adorable and all, but no, the last sentence wasn't a joke.

Vore makes a fetish of an act that, by its nature, involves the death of one party or the other. Eating and digestion is not a survivable process. Vore is in essence a snuff fetish with some additional bits stapled on. I am entirely comfortable calling that horrible.
 

PatSilverFox

New member
Apr 2, 2011
498
0
0
Well vore is a fetish, furries are a fandom. They have a fetish because they are part of a fandom, they are not primarily a fetish like vore is.
So vore definitely.
 

Elvoret

New member
Mar 3, 2011
86
0
0
Vore I guess.

Though the two often get combined into wierder and wierder subsets until you notice it's 4am and your brain no longer wants to work and your eyes are burning except there's no way to unsee all the things you saw.
 

Robert Drapp

New member
Dec 21, 2010
32
0
0
I must agree with the masses. Dressing up (In any sense) is alittle odd depending on your outfit choice while the whole Vore thing confuses me and I am sure that while I might have given Furry a chance (just for the sake of saying I tried it once), Vore is out.
 

AC Drawings

New member
Dec 22, 2010
34
0
0
Vore is creepy and the very idea of it is frightening the whole "Closeness to one you find attractive" thing makes sense in it's own twisted twisted way, but that doesn't make it any less creepy and uncomfortable.
 

Peteron

New member
Oct 9, 2009
1,378
0
0
How can someone be sexually aroused by being eaten? At least furies are a little bit normal once you take off the ears and tail! I had no idea Vore even existed until now, it disgusts me.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Snake Plissken said:
Having sex with people in bunny costumes in the privacy of your own home won't get anyone arrested.

Someone being eaten in any sexual endeavor will.

You, strange sir, are a deviant.
Oh we all know how weird furry is but there's no way it can get weirder than that...

*Looks up Vore on google*

...HOLY JESUS MOTHERF*%KING CHRIST!!!!! People get off to that stuff!?!?

*Grabs bucket* BLAAAAAAAGH DX


my eyes have been ruined once again. *Cries*
 

PatSilverFox

New member
Apr 2, 2011
498
0
0
Wait what about...
Furry Vore

I think it is more tolerable than vore actually.
Well that's probably because it isn't real.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
Sejs Cube said:
Vore makes a fetish of an act that, by its nature, involves the death of one party or the other. Eating and digestion is not a survivable process. Vore is in essence a snuff fetish with some additional bits stapled on. I am entirely comfortable calling that horrible.
Actually what I understood about Vore is that, like many fetishes, it's on a case-by-case basis. <spoiler=Way too gross to have just sitting open>Maybe they're into the idea of suffocation in there, or they just like the idea of a naked saliva slip-and-slide on all sides through a whole body. Maybe they include Guro (dismemberment/death porn) as part of it too. Usually the perpetrator is something weird like a Naga or some other kind of huge monster with female features and tits. Other times it's just a flesh dimension of some sort with no real explanation because "it's porn, dammit!"Just think of it this way... to them it's fulfilling that human desire to get closer to the object of your affection, except taken to the next level of actually being inside their bodies rather than just hugging, kissing or having sex.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Say what you want but there is by far no justification for practicing VORE in real life and you definitely have problems if you wish to partake in that activity.

Leave that shit in the realm of fantasy!
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,029
0
0
Furry is weird as hell, but it's just animals screwing instead of humans.

Vore is just a completely non-sexual thing being taken in a sexual way.
 

Lunepyre

New member
Oct 1, 2009
35
0
0
Vore is weirder. I like both but vore is really only an intimacy thing and to be honest neither of them really cross fetish grounds because they do next to nothing for me sexually. However I know some voreaphiles like to get together and do shit like eat live mice which..is fucking insane. Furry only ever really involves fursuit sex (impractical, but it happens) at it's worst.
 

Biodeamon

New member
Apr 11, 2011
1,652
0
0
First off:what's a vore?
Second off: last time somebody asked a qeustion like this they were put on probation, so kind of on thin ice here
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
darthotaku said:
This thread is to settle a debate between me and my friend. I won't go into specifics but juring a discussion I began kidding him about being a furry. he rebuted by saying that at least he wasn't into vore like I am.
The conversation then changed to which of us had a stranger fetish and ended in both of us undecided. therefor, we concluded that we would put it to an anonymous vote on the internet.

so vote for whichever you think is stranger.

edit: yeah, I can see already that I've lost this vote.

You sir have astounded me. This is coming from someone who can get off to H.R. Giger's Necronomicon.....Jesus Christ that's hot.

But Vore takes the cake. I haven't been this violated since I sat on that mall Santa's lap 11 years ago.
I'm off to go puke out my guts.