darthotaku said:
This thread is to settle a debate between me and my friend. I won't go into specifics but juring a discussion I began kidding him about being a furry. he rebuted by saying that at least he wasn't into vore like I am.
The conversation then changed to which of us had a stranger fetish and ended in both of us undecided. therefor, we concluded that we would put it to an anonymous vote on the internet.
so vote for whichever you think is stranger.
edit: yeah, I can see already that I've lost this vote.
Furry.
Vore is easily understood if it is just a total human interaction, girl eats a shrunken guy or girl.
Vore is weird when it doesn't involve just humans.
Furry is weird because it will always involve non-humans.
I'm looking at this from a sexual prospective, because it is the only way to look at it.
A guy like me being aroused by the thought of being swallowed whole by a beautiful woman is actually not that weird. The most common thought is that the guy what's to feel closest to the girl and be as intimate as possible. What could be more intimate than being eaten like food and entering her body.
The same could be seen in the scenario being flipped and the guy eating the girl.
Since it is a natural attraction involved between members of the opposite sex, it really isn't that weird. It comes from the natural sexual desire to be close and intimate with the one the person is attracted to.
Furry on the other hand is far weirder, since sexual arousal comes from viewing or the thought of interacting with something that is not human.
I would consider sexual fetishes where the point of attraction isn't human, to be weirder than anything that is just human on human.
I would take being sensually licked and tasted, and swallowed whole by a beautiful human girl every time, instead of interacting with some she animal thing that I find no attraction to because it isn't totally human.
Furry is weirder than Vore by a factor of 500. Vore is pretty tame.