God, I hate questions like these. I'd be happy enough to see people do the best they can for society in the field that they can contribute the most towards. Preferably while being satisfied with their lives.
That was my reaction also. I choose artists because I like art.lacktheknack said:What an incredibly unsurprising result from the Escapist.
I chose the Entrepreneurs, as they're the ones that actually drive progress, create jobs, and give me mah precious vidya gaems.
Okay, let's just suppose that everybody can do all the jobs that the working class does in our society -- and I don't believe they can, how many escapists know how to wire a house, and operate farm equipment, and build a house, and craft all the items we use in our daily lives? -- but let's suppose they do. If everybody is farming for their own food, building and up keeping their own house, and spending all their time gathering enough materials to ensure their own survival then who will have the time to do anything else? How will the teachers and scientists have time for years of education when they have to work the fields all day? How can the soldiers train when they have nothing to eat? How can the artists, writers, and musicians practice their trades when they are refining trees to build a house? Can the president lead a country from a farmhouse with no electricity? What good is money when everybody is simply working for their own survival? Society is built around specialization and without the workers to do all of the thousands of manual jobs that keeps people clothed, sheltered, and fed nobody could even begin to think about specializing as any of the jobs that improve society. Workers may not be the most glamorous or prestigious, but they are without a doubt the most important.Dimitriov said:I gotta disagree, that's all stuff that EVERYONE ought to be able to do. It commands no respect.Story said:Damn, that's a very good answer. There are societies that don't have any or many of the things listed above but are fine because they can get good. A society is worth jack if it can't feed itself.TJWhoopy said:None of the above, the most important are those who "do stuff."
farmers, technicians, laborers. those who keep us fed, keep the lights on and our toilets flushing.
Can political leaders really do all these things? They make science possible? Are they gods or men? Did a politician tell Faraday to invent the electric motor, or did he do it on his own? They can build galleries or is that the construction worker? And would the artists not paint without being told to do so? Are humanitarians not harassed by the lower classes as well? Can the soldiers not protect the nation without being specifically directed to do so?Mycroft Holmes said:The leaders control all of these other groups.
They can make science possible, they can make public galleries for the artists, they can harass the humanitarians, they tell the soldiers who to kill. They can create a society of freedom and learning, and they can create societies of ignorance and oppression.
If you don't think the most important members of society are the political leaders; go ask the North Korean sculptor about how important artists are. Go talk to some Nigerian scientists. Go ask Denmark's rich who the most important members of society are.
Yes, but I think you are missing my point. Civilization is founded upon there being a surplus of labour and resources so that not all members of a society need to spend their time growing food etc.Drathnoxis said:Okay, let's just suppose that everybody can do all the jobs that the working class does in our society -- and I don't believe they can, how many escapists know how to wire a house, and operate farm equipment, and build a house, and craft all the items we use in our daily lives? -- but let's suppose they do. If everybody is farming for their own food, building and up keeping their own house, and spending all their time gathering enough materials to ensure their own survival then who will have the time to do anything else? How will the teachers and scientists have time for years of education when they have to work the fields all day? How can the soldiers train when they have nothing to eat? How can the artists, writers, and musicians practice their trades when they are refining trees to build a house? Can the president lead a country from a farmhouse with no electricity? What good is money when everybody is simply working for their own survival? Society is built around specialization and without the workers to do all of the thousands of manual jobs that keeps people clothed, sheltered, and fed nobody could even begin to think about specializing as any of the jobs that improve society. Workers may not be the most glamorous or prestigious, but they are without a doubt the most important.Dimitriov said:I gotta disagree, that's all stuff that EVERYONE ought to be able to do. It commands no respect.Story said:Damn, that's a very good answer. There are societies that don't have any or many of the things listed above but are fine because they can get good. A society is worth jack if it can't feed itself.TJWhoopy said:None of the above, the most important are those who "do stuff."
farmers, technicians, laborers. those who keep us fed, keep the lights on and our toilets flushing.
When you put it like that it does make sense. And you are right, it is entirely subjective. Personally I feel that people should get more respect for worker class jobs as they are performing a service that is absolutely vital to societies function. It just seems wrong to be so necessary and yet be paid so little compared to simple entertainers or sports stars, but I suspect we will just have to agree to disagree.Dimitriov said:snip
I agree with this; without teachers you wouldn't have even the basics of Mathematics, English and Science, which are pretty fundamental to everything else. It's redundant to assign worth to certain sections of society though because in most cases you need some or all of them rather than just one.Storm Dragon said:I'm somewhat biased since both of my parents are teachers, but without them, pretty much everyone else on the list wouldn't be able to do their jobs. Scientists are a close second, but someone has to teach them science in the first place.
Oh this is a good one.SimpleThunda said:The workers. You know... The people that made EVERYTHING. Rather shameful that it isn't in your list of options.
I'd say parents are more important.stormgsk said:Who are the most important members of society? The answer, forever, and always will be, the children.