Poll: Who makes better CoD games?

Recommended Videos

HaloHappy

New member
Sep 7, 2008
342
0
0
So, I'm playing through the past two Call of Duty games to prepare for the new one's release next month, and I'm really disappointed with World at War compared to Modern Warfare. There's so much to compare here: the AI, the graphics, gameplay, etc. Either way, I prefer Infinity Ward's design. But I'd like to know what everyone else thinks.
 

JRCB

New member
Jan 11, 2009
4,387
0
0
I have only played CoD 4 (for a short amount of time, too), so I can't really give an opinion.
 

RavingPenguin

Engaged to PaintyFace
Jan 20, 2009
2,438
0
0
HaloHappy said:
So, I'm playing through the past two Call of Duty games to prepare for the new one's release next month, and I'm really disappointed with World at War compared to Modern Warfare. There's so much to compare here: the AI, the graphics, gameplay, etc. Either way, I prefer Infinity Ward's design. But I'd like to know what everyone else thinks.
Treyarch has better DLC and online support. Infinity Ward couldn't give two shites about they're online multiplayer. I dont encounter the modding problem on WaW that I do on MW.
 

TaborMallory

New member
May 4, 2008
2,382
0
0
Trayarch brought very few new things to the series (WaW immediately comes to mind), so I'm with Infinity Ward.
 

Dyp100

New member
Jul 14, 2009
898
0
0
IW hands down, nothing can compare.

W@W campaign was fun and cinematic, but it felt more like it was trying to be something IW made, and it really made it less enjoyable to replay!

Plus MW is better then WII, and you can't beat IW MP.
 

slipknot4

New member
Feb 19, 2009
2,178
0
0
It amazes me how noone has said Treyarch yet ^^'
Well i'm all in for Infinity even if they are selling out as hell with cod 6
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,637
0
0
COD:WaW was actually quite good, Treyarch have impressed with their updates since release.

But ehy also made CoD 3, it'll take a lot more than alrght support for one game to make up for that phepic ail.
 

HaloHappy

New member
Sep 7, 2008
342
0
0
RavingPenguin said:
HaloHappy said:
So, I'm playing through the past two Call of Duty games to prepare for the new one's release next month, and I'm really disappointed with World at War compared to Modern Warfare. There's so much to compare here: the AI, the graphics, gameplay, etc. Either way, I prefer Infinity Ward's design. But I'd like to know what everyone else thinks.
Treyarch has better DLC and online support. Infinity Ward couldn't give two shites about they're online multiplayer. I dont encounter the modding problem on WaW that I do on MW.
Well I'm more worried as to the campaign compared to DLC
 

GodofDisaster

Premium member
Sep 10, 2009
5,029
0
0
I really enjoy Infinty wards work on cod4 and the upcoming MW2. However I also share some respect for Cod world at war. By the way. Your user name is going to annoy a certain someone.
 

Sion_Barzahd

New member
Jul 2, 2008
1,384
0
0
Personally i prefer Infinity Ward, although it might only be because i preferred the modern day COD game to the WWII stuff. 'Cause lets face it, thats been done to death.

WaW did bring a lot of brilliant things to the COD genre. Mainly zombies.
 

HaloHappy

New member
Sep 7, 2008
342
0
0
knight of some random number said:
I really enjoy Infinty wards work on cod4 and the upcoming MW2. However I also share some respect for Cod world at war. By the way. Your user name is going to annoy a certain someone.
Who would be offended by my name huh?
 

Jonci

New member
Sep 15, 2009
539
0
0
Infinity Ward brings quality and I only count their games as real Call of Duty.

Treyarch just takes a crap and makes it look close to CoD and sells it off. None of their games have ever been fun. It always drowns under poor graphics, bad sounding, and questionable gameplay.
 

I Stomp on Kittens

Don't let go!
Nov 3, 2008
4,289
0
0
RavingPenguin said:
HaloHappy said:
So, I'm playing through the past two Call of Duty games to prepare for the new one's release next month, and I'm really disappointed with World at War compared to Modern Warfare. There's so much to compare here: the AI, the graphics, gameplay, etc. Either way, I prefer Infinity Ward's design. But I'd like to know what everyone else thinks.
Treyarch has better DLC and online support. Infinity Ward couldn't give two shites about they're online multiplayer. I dont encounter the modding problem on WaW that I do on MW.
Treyarch seemed like they just shelled the DLC out of their ass. Don't get me wrong I liked most maps and I think infinity ward's maps were good too, they just needed more released.
 

Crossborder

New member
Oct 16, 2008
504
0
0
Both have their strong points, and as long as it's a decent game, i don't care which is better.
 

El_Sam

New member
Mar 27, 2009
90
0
0
i know everyone will disagree but i really enjoyed 'world at war' more so than 'modern warfare'