I will back this assessment. =DBerethond said:Luxembourg vs. Andorra
I have a feeling it'll start small.
I will back this assessment. =DBerethond said:Luxembourg vs. Andorra
I have a feeling it'll start small.
That's not necessarily true, if anything China would simply roll into North Korea themselves and take over. North Korea's been a thorn in their side for years now, and China's basically been playing the whinging mother apologizing for its unruly child. The situation has changed drastically since the Korean War, mostly that China has become incredibly reliant on western business. Also I doubt South Korea would object either, they'd still have American military support to protect them, and let's face it. Integrating the impoverished, and brainwashed, population would be a huge drain on their economy. That's not even going into the difficulties of integrating them into their political structure. It'd be a nightmare.Shoggoth2588 said:That sounds about right.
The thing is, if North Korea flicks the back of South Korea's ear a bit too hard it could trigger a war between those two...The US will back SK and China will back NK. It would spiral out of control from there.
very true. Bunch of idiots. Now if you don't mind I now have to guard my door from bastard kangaroo jockeys.Kalezian said:Australia on the other hand never is able to get its Kangaroo Military up to strength.
Who is WBC?Trezu said:WBC and the KKK
i wanna watch them to kill each other
sshhh don't tell them thatMr Thin said:It'll start in Australia, as part of Operati- oh wait, I'm not supposed to tell anyone about that yet.
I have no idea where WW3 will begin. Not in my glorious country, that's for sure.
Maybe you missed the part where this wasn't asking who would be involved, but who would likely be the ones to go at it first, triggering other nations involvement and starting a world war.tstorm823 said:It's not really World War unless more than 2 nations get involved...