dazhat said:
I really enjoyed the last two Mass effect games but I wonder if Mass Effect 3 will be as good. Sure, they may follow the same basic format, but I can't help feeling the game could be ruined if they change too much like reintroducing vehicle systems in a crap way.
Thoughts?
Well firstly on your example, the vehicle kicked the shit out of that fucking planet scanning, my gods, molten liquid glass on my arms would've been less painful. The vehicle on the other hand? Well that was just a bit quirky. Besides, I loved taking down a thresher maul to within an inch of its life, then killing it with a pistol, or sniping out geth and mercenaries, that was awesome.
Will it be the game of all of our dreams? Impossible. Will it be as good as either game, very likely. Will it be the best in the series? Odds are against it. I'd say its got a 30% of being the best, 50% of being better than one of the games, and the remaining 20% of it being a close third (mind you, with ME2's story setting the bar so low, it can hardly fail there).
It all depends on whether or not it merges RPG with FPS well or not, the first one was critised as not having enough FPS, the second kills many of the RPG elements, so if this could get inbetween somehow, that'd be a huge point in its favour.
It also has to deal with the Reaper story, which is much harder than either story in ME1 or ME2, but hopefully they thought out the whole story at the beginning of ME1, so it'll have a nice ending.
But worst, worst, worst case scenario, its a 75/100 game, and didn't live up to the hype, and kills a great series - 2 out of 3 games is not bad. It'll still be an awesome FPS/RPG game, with good seqeunce, many good plot elements and gameplay should be good too, even if the main story is a failure, so I don't think many of us will be too badly burnt if it doesn't be the legend we're hoping it will be.