Oh crap, did i fail to mention blues?Treefingers said:Don't get me wrong, im not some classical music snob, but you can't deny the ground-breaking complexity of guys like Mozart. It carries a lot more weight than that which contemporary music has to offer.Straz said:Ah jeez.Treefingers said:For one, Hendrix is already taught in contemporary music history classes.
Secondly, you can't even compare the two. Mozart is a significant figure in the entire of Western music history. He broke ground like few others have, and in a way that can't be repeated let alone topped. His music is technically far far far superior to anything that Hendrix or Metallica could have ever hoped to create.
Hendrix did have a significant contribution to music yes, but it's nothing compared to how important Mozart is.
Way to rip on our music, man.
Although Enter Sandman is hardly an opus magnum.
Just saying, there's plenty of better Metallica around.
In retrospect, you look at say, Pachbel's canon, and you look at a classic 30's pop track, and you have to admit that classical truly was a great genre, as some music was just not made to last.
I say classic 30's pop track with disdain, as pretty much all music prior to Elvis is held with contempt in my eyes.
I don't even know what I'm talking about most of the time.
I love Hendrix. I really do. But comparing Hendrix (or Metallica) to Mozart is just silly.
As a side note, all Elvis did was everything that black blues musicians were doing prior to him, except that he stuck a pretty white face on it and so he became way more famous. To be fair though, he always acknowledged his influence, which was pretty brave in the 50's. There is a lot of good music that came before Elvis though is my point.
Well them too.
I don't really like Elvis, but he certainly broke rock in, so he's good.