Poll: Would you harbor a nazi?

Recommended Videos

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,073
0
0
I think I would do absolutely nothing.

It's not really any of my business.

I'd tell the police stuff anyone else could have told them and send them on their way.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
What the hell does any of this have to do with ends justifying means anyway? Unless you're going to argue that killing Jews somehow made the world a better place, it's completely irrelevant.
 

godofallu

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,660
0
0
Other: The risk to myself for concealing the person is not large enough to offset the reward of helping a human in need.

If he wasn't a nazi in the past life and it was some other lesser crime I would hide him. I can forgive him and wish him luck on his escape, but not actively contribute to his escape.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,644
0
0
Other.
Specifically: No, because there'd be no point.

If the police are already after him, it's too late. The legal system will imprison him, but nothing harsher.

I might not go out of my way to turn him in, but I'm not going to risk myself over him either.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
Rationalization said:
Depends, do I get money for harboring him? Do I get paragon or renegade points for turning him in?
Definitely paragon in this case :p
 

trooper6

New member
Jul 26, 2008
873
0
0
If he is sorry and repentant and all that, then he should turn himself in. And what happens to him should be up to a jury to decide. Preferably the Haag.

I am not harboring a war criminal. This is not about wanting vengeance, it is about following the law.

What if this guy, rather than a Nazi War Criminal...what if he was a serial rapist and killer. In this 20s he raped and murdered 50 young women. Then he felt really bad and turned his life around. Would I say, "Oh, okay, I'll help hide you from the law because you feel badly about what you've done?" No! I'd take him to the police.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,585
0
0
HG131 said:
1) Put into the system to help those the Salvation Army says in its mission statement its bound to help (i.e. the needy, but thats a general term and encompasses a lot of people).

2) Spent it on himself. he had a lot of it in a few bank accounts, and was indulging in caligula like fantasies of wealth and spoilment.

this isnt my name said:
Thats an oppinion. Lets use an example say there is another person with a gun about to shoot someone, say you have the power to stop it, would you ?
Either way someone will die, either through your actions or refusal to act.

I disagree sometimes ending lives can be for the greater good, hell look at WW2 we killed LOTS of people, all to save lives.

Allthough I dont understand in this situation how the guy is saving lives, so I dont really see it as relavent.
Would depend on the person I suppose, though I dont need to stop someone by killing them. I may break him, but I wouldnt need to kill him.

However, put in the situation, and with no prior knowledge, I dont act. I dont know if I'ms aving the next Ghandi or the next Hitler, and I'll bare it on my conscious and in the courts that I didnt help. Its not my place to if I have to kill one person to do it.

And its all well and good to say that we were just and saying we were saving lives, but the US couldnt give two shits about the camps until they actually started stumbling on them. We were in the European Theatre cause Japan pulled us in the Pacific Theatre, and we had already been supplying Britain with guns and supplies to help our allies (all in secrecy). If the US had actually been bothered to save mopre lives, we would have jumped in sooner, instead of sitting behind our isolationist beliefs.
 

mireko

Umbasa
Sep 23, 2010
2,003
0
0
No.

If we're talking about someone who was complicit in the fucking holocaust, then you can't even begin to talk about redemption without a fair trial and sentencing.
 

Rayne870

New member
Nov 28, 2010
1,250
0
0
this isnt my name said:
Rayne870 said:
If it were me in his situation I would have either defected to the Allies, and given them whatever information I had, or if there was no way out of it I would have taken my life and probably the lives of as many Nazis as I could.
Its easy to say that when your not in the situation. Besides killing those nazis wouldnt help, they could feel just like you do, not wanting to be there, but doing so for their family/life.
It's easy to say a lot of things without being in the situation, but it can't be proven whether I would have the capacity to end my own life or not. As for killing the other Nazi's that might share my views that's a chance I would be willing to take, either they are there and actually want to do it, or they need a way out. Everyone has families so that part doesn't concern me one bit. One can't just torture and kill an entire race and chalk it up to, well my job sucks but it puts bread on the table, besides if I didn't do it I wouldn't have to worry about my wife killing me from getting home late, Hitler would kill me for slacking off on the job.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,830
0
0
I'd turn him in. If he's truly repentant, then he'll accept that he needs to pay for what he did, and thus won't object to the police taking him into custody. I would defend him as a person now, and help lead a call for perhaps some degree of leniency based on his (apparent) repentance, but I would certainly give him up to the police, either way. But bear in mind, I agree with HG131, and the 9th Doctor. If someone said that to me then I'd lose all respect for them instantly.
 

automatron

New member
Apr 21, 2010
366
0
0
I probably hide him for the time being, but tell him he can't stay, he'd have to move one
 

Stikibunn

New member
Apr 27, 2009
103
0
0
Phew! what a tough question!
I would dismiss the police at this instance but not shelter him too much, I wouldn't wanna become an accessory. If he were caught later I would be seen to be a nazi too which being white and blonde I don't want!
That said I think that a court case this long after the fact would be horrid and useless. During the case victims would be brought before the jury and forced to relive their past, he would be forced to remember what he went through and so on. After all this time nothing good would come of it. If he were unrepentant I would show no mercy however. Animals that are harmful should be destroyed.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
I'm honestly conflicted here. Part of me wants to see justice served and part of me believes in redemption. If the guy honestly is doing right now and sees he is wrong hasn't he served his punishment? Isn't justice about setting things right not extracting revenge? Oh so conflicted...
 

Allan53

New member
Dec 13, 2007
189
0
0
He's helping people now, punishing him (from a legal standpoint, I suspect he's been punishing himself) would cause no good, and dredge up a lot of ill-feeling.
 

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,028
0
0
Would I harbor a former, apparently reformed nazi or SS member to prevent them from being lynched?

Would I help them run from answering for the crimes that they cannot run from? No. They need to own up to and face judgement for what they did- mob mentality and killing them or giving them to the Israelis or something would be counterintuitive. Man still deserves a fair trial.