This really isn't a yes or no question. Right now I'm extremly tempted to say yes, for I loath humanity as a whole. (Individuals are great, groups mostly aren't for humans generally don't handle authority very well.)
So I'm all about less people in general, regardless we might have a over population problem at all.
However I feel I should actually try to contribute to the conversation, instead of just propogating my extremist opinion.
I for one am not entirely convinced the overpopulation problem is such an enormous problem. The Earth is strong, and humans are cunning. Whatever happens we'll both survive.
Besides that this is not the first time that overpopulation was said to be the inmpending doom of us all. In the early 20th century the "Club of Rome" was very highly respected group of men, who predicted the exact same senarios we are fearing now for the exact same reason, and who where wrong for the exact same reason I believe people today are wrong.
They too thought the humanity had grown to large to fast, they too doubted that the earth and world economy could support such a high population, and they too miscalculated the human treat that has brought us where we are today: Human ingunity, which sparks technological progress. They too underestimated technological breakthroughs waiting to happen. They too feared that the farms would't yield enough crops, even though back then the signs of artificial fertalisers where there. Just like right now the signs for genetically modified crops are here today. They too feared that the coal and natrual recourses based economy couldn't support the world economy enough, even though the signs of a stonger oil based economy where there. Just like right now the signs for a substainable / nuclear fission and fussion are here. (learn this people,for it will become important someday, fission might have some minor (but very scary) negative side-effects, nuclear fussion has not, and it will be the future).
They too feared that the dense population would breed new and terrible disseases that would wreck humanity. Even though the signs of antibiotics were there. Just like right now the signs for genetics applied in medicine are here.
Some of you might fear the developments I mentioned, but I'm more then confident that they will happen. They are the path of least resistance, and that's the path humanity always takes. Besides they are not as scary as you might think.
Space exploration will be for the next century (the 22nd), as right now it's scientifically un(possible/reasonable) and there's no rush yet.
Mark my words a small century from now people will have the exact same discussion, and there will be some historically smartass (a smartass that uses history to make his/her point, not necessarily a smartass who will be as historically awesome as I) who'll tell you not to worry and uses the exact same arguments as I did.
So I'm all about less people in general, regardless we might have a over population problem at all.
However I feel I should actually try to contribute to the conversation, instead of just propogating my extremist opinion.
I for one am not entirely convinced the overpopulation problem is such an enormous problem. The Earth is strong, and humans are cunning. Whatever happens we'll both survive.
Besides that this is not the first time that overpopulation was said to be the inmpending doom of us all. In the early 20th century the "Club of Rome" was very highly respected group of men, who predicted the exact same senarios we are fearing now for the exact same reason, and who where wrong for the exact same reason I believe people today are wrong.
They too thought the humanity had grown to large to fast, they too doubted that the earth and world economy could support such a high population, and they too miscalculated the human treat that has brought us where we are today: Human ingunity, which sparks technological progress. They too underestimated technological breakthroughs waiting to happen. They too feared that the farms would't yield enough crops, even though back then the signs of artificial fertalisers where there. Just like right now the signs for genetically modified crops are here today. They too feared that the coal and natrual recourses based economy couldn't support the world economy enough, even though the signs of a stonger oil based economy where there. Just like right now the signs for a substainable / nuclear fission and fussion are here. (learn this people,for it will become important someday, fission might have some minor (but very scary) negative side-effects, nuclear fussion has not, and it will be the future).
They too feared that the dense population would breed new and terrible disseases that would wreck humanity. Even though the signs of antibiotics were there. Just like right now the signs for genetics applied in medicine are here.
Some of you might fear the developments I mentioned, but I'm more then confident that they will happen. They are the path of least resistance, and that's the path humanity always takes. Besides they are not as scary as you might think.
Space exploration will be for the next century (the 22nd), as right now it's scientifically un(possible/reasonable) and there's no rush yet.
Mark my words a small century from now people will have the exact same discussion, and there will be some historically smartass (a smartass that uses history to make his/her point, not necessarily a smartass who will be as historically awesome as I) who'll tell you not to worry and uses the exact same arguments as I did.