I don't care enough about PS3 exclusives to even play them at a friend's house. Then again none of my friends have PS3's. They all have 360's 
About no 360 Demon's Souls: It can't happen, due to the way the online component works and the pay-to-play nature of LIVE.Xzi said:Like I care. 360 owners got ME2 on the 26th, rated at 95%+. PS3 owners got MAG on the same day, with sub-par ratings at best, 80%-. I'll take a deep RPG over a generic shooter with extra players any day.zzz3339 said:I was wondering, who else thinks that the 360 should get a game like MAG?
The one game I would want ported from the PS3 to 360 is Demon's Souls.
You're trolling because the first 3 words of your post, "Like I care", makes it trolling. It doesn't matter if you stated facts when you don't contribute shit to the discussion. If anything you were trying to start a flame war.Xzi said:I was trolling how? By stating facts? The game I prefer is strictly opinion, but the review scores are accurate. Look it up.Pingieking said:Hey, look. It's a troll.Xzi said:Like I care. 360 owners got ME2 on the 26th, rated at 95%+. PS3 owners got MAG on the same day, with sub-par ratings at best, 80%-. I'll take a deep RPG over a generic shooter with extra players any day.zzz3339 said:I was wondering, who else thinks that the 360 should get a game like MAG?
The one game I would want ported from the PS3 to 360 is Demon's Souls.
http://www.gamerankings.com
Bah! More fanboys...peel15 said:Problem number one with Massive Action Game on the 360:
Microsoft: Microsoft being the evil corporation they are making really crappy consoles that die on you after three years right before the release of MAG and they greedy so they'd make you pay even more to play MAG online.
Problem number two
It makes no sense to put it on the 360 because MAG requires TEAMWORK something that 360 users are not capable of. *stares at mw2*
Problem number three
The PS3 is better anyways.
XBL can support the type of server structure that MAG uses, can't it?TelHybrid said:256 players on a peer to peer network like xbox live? LOL
That's the point, XBL doesn't use servers at all. The player's consoles are the hosts for the games. This is why the maximum number of players on a game on XBL is something like 24, whereas PSN actually uses servers hence the support for MAG.Pingieking said:Bah! More fanboys...peel15 said:Problem number one with Massive Action Game on the 360:
Microsoft: Microsoft being the evil corporation they are making really crappy consoles that die on you after three years right before the release of MAG and they greedy so they'd make you pay even more to play MAG online.
Problem number two
It makes no sense to put it on the 360 because MAG requires TEAMWORK something that 360 users are not capable of. *stares at mw2*
Problem number three
The PS3 is better anyways.
XBL can support the type of server structure that MAG uses, can't it?TelHybrid said:256 players on a peer to peer network like xbox live? LOL
Exactly! We have a genius right here!Onyx Oblivion said:I could care less about 256 player matches in massive maps.
Why?
Because more people doesn't automatically make a game better.