Are guitarists who use chorus and reverb also freaking disgraceful and disgust you? What about whammy pedals? Distortion? They're all additional effects that improve the sound of a guitarist, much like an auto-tuned singer.Gildan Bladeborn said:So my message to all the so-called "artists" who "sing" entirely through the aid of auto-tune: Get bent, that is freaking disgraceful and you disgust me.
Yeah! Fuck electronic music! Fuck synthesisers! Fuck MaxMSP!TheLiham said:My view on the subject. If you can't make music without the aid of computers. Don't make fucking music! Unluckily there is barely anyone on the radio who do play their own instruments and now they aren't even using their voices ¬¬
Do guitarists just program their music and let something else play it for them? That is effectively what auto-tune is. Anybody can sing with auto-tune, it needs no talent.GiantRaven said:Are guitarists who use chorus and reverb also freaking disgraceful and disgust you? What about whammy pedals? Distortion? They're all additional effects that improve the sound of a guitarist, much like an auto-tuned singer.Gildan Bladeborn said:So my message to all the so-called "artists" who "sing" entirely through the aid of auto-tune: Get bent, that is freaking disgraceful and you disgust me.
As far as I'm concerned it's just another effect that can potentially be utilised in the crafting of a song. However, I do feel it has become somewhat overused, or at the very least not used innovatively enough.
Even people that actually don't try singing can sing with autotune. Just look atChairman Miaow said:Anybody can sing with auto-tune, it needs no talent.
Coming from that aspect (which I had neglected to consider) then sure, the auto-tune does have negative connotations of a lack of talent and laziness. I just don't understand the complaints about how it's bad because it makes somebodies voice sound better.Chairman Miaow said:Do guitarists just program their music and let something else play it for them? That is effectively what auto-tune is. Anybody can sing with auto-tune, it needs no talent.
Why the hell would they be? They're people actually playing instruments - the effects that get layered on top of that may or may not make the end result sound better or significantly more annoying, but that is still a bloody skill.GiantRaven said:Are guitarists who use chorus and reverb also freaking disgraceful and disgust you? What about whammy pedals? Distortion? They're all additional effects that improve the sound of a guitarist, much like an auto-tuned singer.Gildan Bladeborn said:So my message to all the so-called "artists" who "sing" entirely through the aid of auto-tune: Get bent, that is freaking disgraceful and you disgust me.
Gildan Bladeborn said:Why the hell would they be? They're people actually playing instruments - the effects that get layered on top of that may or may not make the end result sound better or significantly more annoying, but that is still a bloody skill.
You are correct, it isn't a skill. It's an effect. Something that can utilised within the sound world to add aesthetic content to music. Why does 'skill' even enter the equation?Talking into a microphone and having the output translated into a stupid robot voice on the other hand is not a skill
I would say that this is a personal opinion (although one that I would be more inclined to agree with than disagree with).it doesn't sound good (not as the ubiquitous 'voice' of a song at least), and it's never an improvement over a decent natural voice.
Songs? Albums? Really? Albums are often thematic in nature, especially when it comes to their timbrel content. If an artist wants to utilise an auto-tune over the course of an album, what's wrong with that? I agree about being over a career though, an artist should vary how they create music over the course of their career.but recording entire songs/albums/careers using nothing but "the auto-tone voice" is, as I earlier suggested, completely disgraceful
Because...you don't like how it sounds?you can sing but for some bizarre reason think sounding like a pitch-perfect robot all the time is preferable, in which case you are simply crazy.
I agree wholeheartedly. But I don't think talented artists who want to utilise an auto-tune should take flak because of the talentless hacks.There is nothing whatsoever wrong with electronic composition and editing tools, except when they are used as a crutch for talentless hacks - if I can't play a bloody guitar, I really have no business calling myself a guitarist, now do I?
Daft Punk isn't autotuned. They use vocoders.Outright Villainy said:It has its uses.
As well as auto tune the news and the like.
Would I give those up if it meant getting rid of it completely though?
Fuck yes. It's just a crutch for poor musicians these days, and even when used subtly, it just makes it sound way too artificial and polished.
And don't get me started on the monstrosity that is ke-dollar-ha.
Vocoders? What about One More Time?koriantor said:Daft Punk isn't autotuned. They use vocoders.Outright Villainy said:It has its uses.
As well as auto tune the news and the like.
Would I give those up if it meant getting rid of it completely though?
Fuck yes. It's just a crutch for poor musicians these days, and even when used subtly, it just makes it sound way too artificial and polished.
And don't get me started on the monstrosity that is ke-dollar-ha.
Oh. Well then I guess I can say outside of parody songs, I abhor every instance of autotune I've heard in music!koriantor said:Daft Punk isn't autotuned. They use vocoders.Outright Villainy said:It has its uses.
As well as auto tune the news and the like.
Would I give those up if it meant getting rid of it completely though?
Fuck yes. It's just a crutch for poor musicians these days, and even when used subtly, it just makes it sound way too artificial and polished.
And don't get me started on the monstrosity that is ke-dollar-ha.