As someone who has worked extensively in the security field, there's no end to the stupid assumptions and misconceptions about what I do/have done.
Yeah me too. Most of our clients are dumb asses, thanks to the advent of digital cameras, the pros are much harder to find these days.TopazFusion said:I've worked in photographic enhancement, and the number of times I've been presented with a shitty little thumbnail and requested to somehow turn it into a high quality, poster-sized image is beyond belief.
I'm sorry, this ain't CSI.
I actually like some abstract art. What I find maddening is when I see something like Malevich's Black Square and White on White in the portfolio of an otherwise talented artist.Kpt._Rob said:As an artist I deal with tons of misconceptions about art. The big one that bothers me is when people say something like "I was just never talented enough to be an artist." No one was ever born with innate artistic talent. Becoming an artist means learning all the techniques for rendering an image, developing thematic and philosophical content, practicing a lot, and having the patience to work on a painting for the ridiculous amount of time that it takes to make a good painting. It's not talent, it's hard work, and it's frustrating to hear that get dismissed.
And while I don't work in pure abstraction myself, I do find it offensive when people outright dismiss artists like Pollock or Rothko because they don't understand enough about the art world to know how to look at them in the first place. Yes, there are some talentless hacks who have used abstraction to get away with being lazy, but that's no reason to dismiss an entire genre inhabited by some truly driven artists.
Pretty much this. I subscribe to Popper's method of determining the validity of a scientific theory and hypothesis, which is pretty specific on how to go about it.JoJo said:As someone studying a science degree, it pisses me off when some people seem to think that science is all about making random guesses and any implausible hypothesis farted out in the space of five minutes can be a "scientific theory", or that it's "all bullshit". I've even encountered this attitude in people who have taken a science A-level, no less.
True, you can never be sure in science exactly what is right and what will eventually be disproved, but that "bullshit" can still be pretty damn useful when it helps get your car to work every morning, grow the crops you eat for lunch, power the entertainment you consume and save your life when you have a heart attack.
Now I am not usually a grammar Nazi, but this one annoys me quite a bit.Spade Lead said:"should of" when they mean "Should have."
What? No. We don't believe that at all!Heronblade said:Lets see:
The majority opinion about the field of engineering seems to place us as glorified fix it men
A runner-up on that farce is the opinion that we're those people that drive trains.
Even those that know what we do tend to assume the field is exclusively technical in nature, ignoring the creative and artistic aspects.
This happens to me All.The.Time. I didn't finish college (not a valid person?) but I make a living fixing computers, cleaning them out/optimizing them, and training people on how to use them. I'm also a webmaster/IT for a small business.klown said:You could call my expertise computer science. I really hate when people assume I know everything about every piece of electronic equipment ever. I swear if someone hears that I have built my own computer and am studying computer science, they ask me what stereo they should get in their car, or which TV would be better for their house...oh wait..sorry, not what people misunderstand about us personally..my bad.
I have to repeat the one about hacking. People think it's all screens that flash around and you type really fast cracking through firewalls and taking down the man! They think they can give me an email address and I should be able to hack the password in no time flat and give them full access to it.
fKpt._Rob said:As an artist I deal with tons of misconceptions about art. The big one that bothers me is when people say something like "I was just never talented enough to be an artist." No one was ever born with innate artistic talent. Becoming an artist means learning all the techniques for rendering an image, developing thematic and philosophical content, practicing a lot, and having the patience to work on a painting for the ridiculous amount of time that it takes to make a good painting. It's not talent, it's hard work, and it's frustrating to hear that get dismissed.
And while I don't work in pure abstraction myself, I do find it offensive when people outright dismiss artists like Pollock or Rothko because they don't understand enough about the art world to know how to look at them in the first place. Yes, there are some talentless hacks who have used abstraction to get away with being lazy, but that's no reason to dismiss an entire genre inhabited by some truly driven artists.
You are wrong about evolution man, it was aliens man...Yopaz said:Now I am not usually a grammar Nazi, but this one annoys me quite a bit.Spade Lead said:"should of" when they mean "Should have."
OT: As a biologist almost every popular belief goes against the fact.
Discussion about what is a fruit and what is a berry is kinda silly since fruit is the general term while berry is the specific one. Berries, nuts, drupes are all fruits.
Evolution is a turf where almost everyone who believes in it don't really understand it. Now I wont go into details into this one or else someone who knows less than me will try to tell me I'm wrong about it.
I get that one about why doesn't my ps3 or xbox read disks anymore at least twice a week at work now that they know I'm a gamer. Like I'm going to know why your ps3 doesn't work right from 30 miles away, while you use describing words like "I don't know, I put the disk in and everything."DrunkOnEstus said:-snip-