It's not censorship. It's called "good taste".Sibren said:Theaters stopping a movie from playing, okay (questionable, but okay). But Boll is not able to rent! spaces to play his movie. That is censorship and nothing else. It just seems so drastic to me and unfair. There are so many crap movies coming out all the time (often even worse), but those are not barred.
Actually, his budgets are generous, considering. He wastes a good portion of that budget on hiring known (but, in many cases, past their prime) actors and then making them regret their career decision (Ben Kingsley, Christian Slater, Tara Reid, Michael Madsen, Billy Zane, Jason Statham, John Rhys-Davies, Ron Perlman, Claire Forlani, Ray Liotta, Burt Reynolds, Dave Foley).Anyway I don't agree with this whole mass rant on Boll all the time. He's making movies, of which some (not all) are really bad. But he is doing this with little to no budget. Furthermore, what I really hate is that his films already get grounded into dust, before they even come out. A bad review is fine, but not if given beforehand, without seeing the movie. So many people have an opinion on his films, but I wonder how many actually saw some of his films.
I've seen Bloodrayne and Alone in the Dark. They were both very much bad movies.