PREY is getting Excellent reviews from everywhere

Recommended Videos

DaCosta

New member
Aug 11, 2016
184
0
0
B-Cell said:
no one cares about original prey [...] too easy and you cant even die
And here I thought you loved System Shock 2 and its instant revive chambers and their negligible cost...
 

Phoenixmgs_v1legacy

Muse of Fate
Sep 1, 2010
4,691
0
0
Bombiz said:
Phoenixmgs said:
Gaming is quite cheap if you play on a console.
also on PC. Don't hate PC just because of the PCMR people. makes no real sense.
I didn't hate on PC. I just prefer consoles because their pros are more important to me than the pros of PC gaming. There's quite a few people here that think console gaming has no pros at all.
 

JagermanXcell

New member
Oct 1, 2012
1,098
0
0
B-Cell said:
more like. They slap the name of mediocre game and turn it into masterpiece.

no one cares about original prey. its gameplay suck. was too linear and scripted, too easy and you cant even die

new Prey is challenging game in the vien of system shock 2.

I rather have System shock 2/Half life successor than Prey 2006 successor.
What is a 90's interactive sim Linda?! Difficulty is subjective (revive chambers didn't make System Shock 2 a snore?) Linda. You're repeating yourself, comparing the game to others instead of pointing out if it did ANYTHING original at all, and dodging questions again Linda.
 

Poetic Nova

Pulvis Et Umbra Sumus
Jan 24, 2012
1,974
0
0
B-Cell said:
more like. They slap the name of mediocre game and turn it into masterpiece.

no one cares about original prey. its gameplay suck. was too linear and scripted, too easy and you cant even die
Gotta love hyperboling (I, for one stil would play the actual Prey if it's engine wasn't constricted to a single CPU core), plus, you forget that dying in System Shock is a slap on the wrist at most.

Also, linearity is not always a bad thing.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Headdrivehardscrew said:
RaikuFA said:
I refuse to buy it on principle and encourage others to do the same.
I'm with you on this one.

After what happened with Human Head Studios, Bethesda and Prey 2, I simply found myself unable to put much hope into this all-new "Prey", Arkane Studios or not.

The original Prey has a special place in my heart, as one of the most surprising good games of its time... too bad it's still being forced into extinction and generally being forgotten by the gaming public.

Maybe, just maybe this new "Prey" will eventually, later-on in the story, or in some remote DLC offer some of that sweet walking-on-the-ceiling action or even just more interesting enemy types than "hot black smoke tentacle thing crab-style" and "hot black smoke teleporting tentacle man thing"... not a fan. Sure, it may be much "better" than the legendary Gearbox rape and ongoing exploitation of the Duke Nukem IP, but an average, 08/15 shooty shooty FPS just won't do it for Prey in my books.

Thanks to Arkane for somewhat trying, but Bethesda's spirit animal for this one is clearly the maggot.

I liked that one it was very fun.

Phoenixmgs said:
Bombiz said:
Phoenixmgs said:
Gaming is quite cheap if you play on a console.
also on PC. Don't hate PC just because of the PCMR people. makes no real sense.
I didn't hate on PC. I just prefer consoles because their pros are more important to me than the pros of PC gaming. Pretty much everyone here thinks console gaming has no pros at all.
FTFY
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,786
1
0
JagermanXcell said:
What is a 90's interactive sim Linda?! Difficulty is subjective (revive chambers didn't make System Shock 2 a snore?) Linda. You're repeating yourself, comparing the game to others instead of pointing out if it did ANYTHING original at all, and dodging questions again Linda.
What with calling B-Cell Linda? Do you know something we don't?
 

JagermanXcell

New member
Oct 1, 2012
1,098
0
0
Chimpzy said:
JagermanXcell said:
What is a 90's interactive sim Linda?! Difficulty is subjective (revive chambers didn't make System Shock 2 a snore?) Linda. You're repeating yourself, comparing the game to others instead of pointing out if it did ANYTHING original at all, and dodging questions again Linda.
What with calling B-Cell Linda? Do you know something we don't?
Either I know of the juicy B-Cell lore that you crave, or I just give people random first names when they act aloof. I'll leave that to your interpretation.
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,786
1
0
JagermanXcell said:
Chimpzy said:
JagermanXcell said:
What is a 90's interactive sim Linda?! Difficulty is subjective (revive chambers didn't make System Shock 2 a snore?) Linda. You're repeating yourself, comparing the game to others instead of pointing out if it did ANYTHING original at all, and dodging questions again Linda.
What with calling B-Cell Linda? Do you know something we don't?
Either I know of the juicy B-Cell lore that you crave, or I just give people random first names when they act aloof. I'll leave that to your interpretation.
Intriguing. By all means, continue. I look forward to wherever this may lead.
 

sXeth

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 15, 2012
3,301
676
118
Based off the demo. The shooting is kind of crap, which is kind of expected (if you ever tried shooting in Dishonored as a regular go to). The stealths a little wonky too, feels really tacked on, not like the game was designed for it at all (and shadow tentacle crabs with no discernible faces are a little bizarre to try and decipher their vision angles). Didn't get too much into the System Shock homage RPG system within the span of it.

If Dishonored was Arkane doing their spin at Thief, this one is pretty clearly System Shock a la Arkane. But System Shock itself was more of an ambition and concept then actual execution, and Arkane seems to (in the demo impression) have the same issue when they spread their mechanics out more then they did in Dishonoreds primarily stealth play.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
I don't call 6/10 [http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/08/prey-review-shock-of-the-new-6623206/] "Excellent", so evidently "everywhere" is objectively untrue... Discuss. Discus! DIS-CUSSS! Ahem...

The trailers made it look boring as fuck, and nothing I've read about it piques my interest. The actual/original Prey was--- kinda fun, in a dumb way that never really capitalised on its potential. A great opening to the game, at least by way of being a little different than usual. This Prey looks the complete opposite of 'a little different'.
 

Nature Guardian

New member
Nov 9, 2016
236
0
0
That's great, but does it even matter? Is there anyone who STILL trust reviews?

Don't get me wrong, I think Prey is probably a quite good game. It's just that the reviews don't count. Reviews don't count anymore these days.
 

B-Cell_v1legacy

New member
Feb 9, 2016
2,102
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
I don't call 6/10 [http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/08/prey-review-shock-of-the-new-6623206/] "Excellent", so evidently "everywhere" is objectively untrue... Discuss. Discus! DIS-CUSSS! Ahem...

The trailers made it look boring as fuck, and nothing I've read about it piques my interest. The actual/original Prey was--- kinda fun, in a dumb way that never really capitalised on its potential. A great opening to the game, at least by way of being a little different than usual. This Prey looks the complete opposite of 'a little different'.
thats only one review.

beside i trust worthy youtubers than professional critics. they are used to of playing COD like FPS where you have explosion ever 3 second, scripted, regen health and cover system.
 

MrBoBo

New member
Jul 23, 2008
214
0
0
I agree, the trailers and footage made the game look incredibly boring. The enemies as well (basically black things) didn't help.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
B-Cell said:
thats only one review.
...unsurprisingly, I knew that'd be your exact response. If you wish to amend your thread title, by all means go ahead - if you actually meant 'Prey is getting excellent reviews from certain review bodies I approve of'.

beside i trust worthy youtubers than professional critics. they are used to of playing COD like FPS where you have explosion ever 3 second, scripted, regen health and cover system.
...please don't try to generalise about a review source you likely know nothing of. GC at Metro have been reviewing all sorts of games (as well as doing some of best interviews in the biz) over decades (in terms of lineage they technically go back to the mid '90's on Teletext, when it was known as Digitiser, though obviously it's now a completely different team).

YT has some excellent content creators, sure (George Weidman [https://www.youtube.com/user/bunnyhopshow] for one, Joseph Anderson [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyhnYIvIKK_--PiJXCMKxQQ] for another), but it also has a large number of brainless, ignorant idiots 'reviewing' games, so I say go the Mulder route; Trust No One But Look At Multiple Sources And Gather A Variety Of Anecdotal Player Experience And Then Maybe Watch Some Of An LP And Then Ideally Maybe Try The Game Out Yourself. Pretty sure that was an X-Files line...
 

B-Cell_v1legacy

New member
Feb 9, 2016
2,102
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
B-Cell said:
thats only one review.
...unsurprisingly, I knew that'd be your exact response. If you wish to amend your thread title, by all means go ahead - if you actually meant 'Prey is getting excellent reviews from certain review bodies I approve of'.

beside i trust worthy youtubers than professional critics. they are used to of playing COD like FPS where you have explosion ever 3 second, scripted, regen health and cover system.
...please don't try to generalise about a review source you likely know nothing of. GC at Metro have been reviewing all sorts of games (as well as doing some of best interviews in the biz) over decades (in terms of lineage they technically go back to the mid '90's on Teletext, when it was known as Digitiser, though obviously it's now a completely different team).

YT has some excellent content creators, sure (George Weidman [https://www.youtube.com/user/bunnyhopshow] for one, Joseph Anderson [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyhnYIvIKK_--PiJXCMKxQQ] for another), but it also has a large number of brainless, ignorant idiots 'reviewing' games, so I say go the Mulder route; Trust No One But Look At Multiple Sources And Gather A Variety Of Anecdotal Player Experience And Then Maybe Watch Some Of An LP And Then Ideally Maybe Try The Game Out Yourself. Pretty sure that was an X-Files line...

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2017/05/09/prey-review/

theres RPS review. who dont give scores but they praise it. and its PC focus site.

point is. except few negative review who dislike it because its too deep for them. its been getting positive reviews.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
B-Cell said:
point is. except few negative review who dislike it because its too deep for them. its been getting positive reviews.
Is that a joke? The review I linked to - debunking your thread title - clearly didn't dislike it because it was "too deep", they disliked the lack of innovation in the setting, the bland enemy designs, and so on. It's just one opinion, of course, but so are all the other reviews.
 

Tomeran

New member
Nov 17, 2011
156
0
0
Its not bad. Its "worth-the-money, might consider a re-play eventually"-kind of good. So...yeah. Depends on peoples tastes. Most gamers seemed to treat the bioshock games as the second coming of christ(I found them entertaining but not a 10/10 experience), and im fairly sure that those people will appreciate this game greatly, since it has certain "bioshock, but in space"-vibes to it.

Its polished, well optimized, has fun combat mechanics, interesting-enough story and at least some re-play value. 8/10?

Not sure I consider it a game worth raising a ruckus about or placing on a pedestal though.
 

CritialGaming

New member
Mar 25, 2015
2,170
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
B-Cell said:
point is. except few negative review who dislike it because its too deep for them. its been getting positive reviews.
Is that a joke? The review I linked to - debunking your thread title - clearly didn't dislike it because it was "too deep", they disliked the lack of innovation in the setting, the bland enemy designs, and so on. It's just one opinion, of course, but so are all the other reviews.
I'm just gonna say I hated the game so much I refunded it on Steam. So there's that. I'm obviously not a certified review outlet or anything, just a guy who's been playing video games for 27 fucking years.

Funny how the moment you disagree with someone they just say, "Well you don't know WTF you are talking about."

It's fine to like something that somebody else doesn't, I don't know why people have to defend their game choices to the death.

Prey is not the second coming of video-game Jesus. It's not even good enough to be an FPS masterpiece as the 74 on metacritic will attest too. Prey is just a decent game, nothing more, nothing less. And like most decent games, people will either love it (like B-Cell, though im not sure he has played it yet) or hate it (like my mentally disturbed self)
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,786
1
0
JUMBO PALACE said:
No matter how many B-Cell threads I wander into I'm still equally shocked at how far someone's head can be up their own rear end every time.
And! It! IS! GLORIOUS! ... no, really. Thoroughly entertaining.

It makes me really wonder who/what he/she/it really is. My bets are on gunsexual male post-op transsexual lemure bodybuilder neckbeard with a limp in his left leg and a crippling addiction to MANdarins.