Professor Abandons Grades for Experience Points

delet

New member
Nov 2, 2008
5,090
0
0
IU, eh? Well, that college very well may have pushed itself up above Purdue now. Yay Indiana; GO CORN!
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
This would have helped me finish school I think. The idea of gradual and easy to understand progress through a course, even if only a thin veil over the curriculum, would have been refreshing. I do have an interesting thought. What if this practice were taken to it's furthest degree? In The Tao of Leveling [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_237/7035-The-Tao-of-Leveling] Brett discusses his own personal level through life. He also takes the idea to stat points and skill points.. Could we one day, instead of getting grades, earn "specialties", like in the World of Darkness games? Get an A+ in Math 11, get a 3 dot specialty for Math 11.

Could a resume one day look like a character sheet for a Pen and Paper RPG?
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
Wow. That's a pretty awesome idea, I've got to say. I can definately see that being a motivation to get your work done.
 

Gigaguy64

Special Zero Unit
Apr 22, 2009
5,481
0
0
I like it!
Besides doing something that many of the students actually understand, its cool because you can constantly improve your grade.
I was never good at taking tests and just one bad test grade can ruin your overall grade, so earning points based on EVERYTHING that you do to get a final grade is an excellent idea.
 

pntaylor

Reticulating Splines
Mar 16, 2010
36
0
0
Certainly an interesting attempt at motivating student as since everything you do got you points you would feel like nothing is pointless. I know from my own experience you sort of prioritise the tasks/write-ups that influence the greater percentage of your final grades over the smaller tasks. If it all meant something I would certainly treat every task the same and give them all equal priority; I like it!
 

Captain Pancake

New member
May 20, 2009
3,453
0
0
Sounds awesome. I'd love a system like that, just to watch my teacher's try to keep a straight face as I level up in front of them.

I'd be level 70 scholar by the end of the year!
 

RvLeshrac

This is a Forum Title.
Oct 2, 2008
662
0
0
I am, and have always been, of the opinion that 100% of one's grade should be based on a practical exam at the end of a course. Open-Resource, because that's the way the world works. If you can't apply your knowledge, and can't look up what you don't know, then you don't deserve to pass.

After you graduate and get a job, every day is an exam. I'm sick of having to carry college grads and/or "certified" workers on my back.
 

TheDoctor455

Friendly Neighborhood Time Lord
Apr 1, 2009
12,257
0
0
JRCB said:
An interesting idea. I don't see what the huge difference between the experience points system and an actual letter grade are, but meh. Sounds amusing, to say the least. What do you get when you level up?
Hmm... from what I can tell, the main difference is that the EXP. system is almost purely a point-based system, rather than a percentile grade system (which is what the traditional letter grade system is like). Ideally, however, for an "Experience Points" system to work, and make sense with in-game experience points systems... I think each "quest" or project/assignment/quiz/whatever, would need to have its "EXP gain" based on how difficult the assignment generally is. If the teacher/prof. implementing such a system wanted to take it further... additional EXP points could be awarded for students challenging themselves, or coming up with especially clever solutions to various problems that a given project would present.

Sorry... I'm the child of two teachers.
 

ThatOneJewYouNo

New member
Sep 22, 2009
132
0
0
Wow, that's actually pretty awesome.
Now I feel really stupid, since I'm leaving for Pennsylvania when I could just stay home here in Indiana and get taught by this guy. He seems to definitely know what he's doing.
 

mokes310

New member
Oct 13, 2008
1,898
0
0
So explain to me how this is any different from how we currently measure aptitude? This just seems like we've rebranded Shine-o-la here...am I wrong?
 

hey_iknowyou

New member
Dec 24, 2008
118
0
0
mokes310 said:
So explain to me how this is any different from how we currently measure aptitude? This just seems like we've rebranded Shine-o-la here...am I wrong?
I think the main difference is that you get rewarded for work done throughout the year as opposed to purely based on exam results. A lot of courses do a similar thing, I need to do assessments throughout the year that all count towards my final grade, I suppose this is a novel way of approaching the idea. It also provides some interesting ideas, for example can anybody get an A if they work hard enough if there are unlimited "quests" or "sidequests"?? And would this be a good or bad thing?
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
mokes310 said:
So explain to me how this is any different from how we currently measure aptitude? This just seems like we've rebranded Shine-o-la here...am I wrong?
Because it actually takes into consideration what works in the modern world and attempts to revitalize the interest in school related activities. The reason educational shows with puppets have been around for decades is that you need to grab people's attention by starting from something that they actually care about and/or enjoy. Put on a teacher saying "A is a letter. you have this many letters, and they form words" and the kids will start playing with their shoelaces. Put on a furry monkey singing about how "A is for Avocado" and the kid starts learning letters and words.
 

ark123

New member
Feb 19, 2009
485
0
0
Oh and also this means that you have a teacher that cares about whether or not the students are learning. That by itself could be more beneficial than the actual method.