Hmm... from what I can tell, the main difference is that the EXP. system is almost purely a point-based system, rather than a percentile grade system (which is what the traditional letter grade system is like). Ideally, however, for an "Experience Points" system to work, and make sense with in-game experience points systems... I think each "quest" or project/assignment/quiz/whatever, would need to have its "EXP gain" based on how difficult the assignment generally is. If the teacher/prof. implementing such a system wanted to take it further... additional EXP points could be awarded for students challenging themselves, or coming up with especially clever solutions to various problems that a given project would present.JRCB said:An interesting idea. I don't see what the huge difference between the experience points system and an actual letter grade are, but meh. Sounds amusing, to say the least. What do you get when you level up?
Ah, yes, the Fuck-You Perk. Comes in handy.Greg Tito said:And then when I finally level up, I could tell my manager to f*ck off and give that job to the noobs.
This pretty much sum the whole thing up. I just wish they did this over here (the xp in lieu of grades thing, not the picture)buy teh haloz said:
I think the main difference is that you get rewarded for work done throughout the year as opposed to purely based on exam results. A lot of courses do a similar thing, I need to do assessments throughout the year that all count towards my final grade, I suppose this is a novel way of approaching the idea. It also provides some interesting ideas, for example can anybody get an A if they work hard enough if there are unlimited "quests" or "sidequests"?? And would this be a good or bad thing?mokes310 said:So explain to me how this is any different from how we currently measure aptitude? This just seems like we've rebranded Shine-o-la here...am I wrong?
Because it actually takes into consideration what works in the modern world and attempts to revitalize the interest in school related activities. The reason educational shows with puppets have been around for decades is that you need to grab people's attention by starting from something that they actually care about and/or enjoy. Put on a teacher saying "A is a letter. you have this many letters, and they form words" and the kids will start playing with their shoelaces. Put on a furry monkey singing about how "A is for Avocado" and the kid starts learning letters and words.mokes310 said:So explain to me how this is any different from how we currently measure aptitude? This just seems like we've rebranded Shine-o-la here...am I wrong?