It is a one time load... But 10 seconds? It's WAY longer than that.Zachary Amaranth said:Does a one-time load of like ten seconds bother you? 10frobalt said:Are load times and frame rates really that bad?
Because that's what you get.
It might be slightly longer, but WAY? In caps? I barely have time to leave the room.oversoon said:It is a one time load... But 10 seconds? It's WAY longer than that.
Where exactly do the controls leave much to be desired, if you don't mind my asking? Didn't have any trouble playing through the game with it's controlscheme, so I'm interested in what you found to be faulty with it.00slash00 said:but the controls and game play leave much to be desired. Definitely works better as a movie than a game
It's funny how cheap this makes me sound.Ultratwinkie said:Even the price point is still debatable. Which has been proven since the price scared him away. Not exactly convincing that its "poor man's gaming" when he ran from the price and bought what amounts to a humble bundle and playing a free to play. Its been obvious that the price for console gaming is high and its best to get the console when its retro when no one wants it anymore. Its retro, but people still cling onto it. So naturally the price will be high.
No. If you have a PC, wait for a PC port (then some more for the patch for all the inevitable problems with it). The console versions aren't as bad as some f***ing annoying fanboys (looking at you, "master race") would have you believe, but just for it it's not worth it...frobalt said:[...]Is GTA V good enough that it'd be worth buying a PS3 for it? (Well, I'd be buying it for GTA V, but would probably buy other games as well, such as last of us)
Physical just can't be beat because, oh I don't know, you can fucking sell that physical game after your done. The digital price may be cheaper (and it usually isn't cheaper on PSN even with PS+ discounts) but you then can't sell that game after you're done. I only buy digital games on PSN that are under $10.Ultratwinkie said:Not from what i seen, used games can be gigantic ripoffs.
Unless its console exclusive, Steam, origin, and uplay blow the used games out of the water. Digital just cant be beat. Even PSN+ beats used physical games.
Its only in old exclusive titles does used games make any sense.
This, The PS3 is worth getting for its exclusives (Infamous, little big planet and Uncharted to name 3) and also the amazing Playstation plus, I have about 40 games, really REALLY good games just lying about on my PS3 that i played pennies for. £40 a year for 24+ good PS3 games, Its Bioshock Infinite atm.phoenixlink said:If your going to get a Ps3 get one for The Last of Us not GTAV
There's a GTA V bundle that would serve your needs pretty well.frobalt said:So I've been thinking recently: I want to play GTA V but don't have an xbox or ps3.
Here's a question for those that have played it:
Is GTA V good enough that it'd be worth buying a PS3 for it? (Well, I'd be buying it for GTA V, but would probably buy other games as well, such as last of us)
Also, does anyone know where about in the UK would be the best place to buy it? Or what HDD size I'd need at the least?
Yes, WAY-in-caps longer. 10 seconds is about a twelfth of the time it take to load on either system.Zachary Amaranth said:It might be slightly longer, but WAY? In caps? I barely have time to leave the room.oversoon said:It is a one time load... But 10 seconds? It's WAY longer than that.
Granted, I'm playing on the 360. Is it longer on the PS3?
Tbh I have a PS3 and I'm still waiting on a PC version. Shooters are just something I enjoy a lot more when I'm able to use a mouse and keyboard. I've played RDR on a PS3 as there's no PC version of it and I've enjoyed it... but using auto-aim (or aiming as if I was using a robot, rather than a pair of arms) took a good portion of the fun out of it. I'm also looking forward to giving the online portion a go, always wanted something like it, but I've had far better experiences with PC online communities (not fantastic either... but miles ahead still in my experience)frobalt said:I have wondered if I should wait for the PC version, but that could be a long way away and I'm a bit impatient.
Yeah, no. I've never, ever had to wait even close to two minutes to load GTA V. Unless you count the initial install, and then you're off by about six minutes.oversoon said:Yes, WAY-in-caps longer. 10 seconds is about a twelfth of the time it take to load on either system.
It'd help if they actually added in the stuff they've been hyping since the game was announced. I've been rather bored the few times I've been on of late.O maestre said:The only problem with waiting is that the online part, and in my opinion the mist fun part might be completely depopulated by then.
In fairness, Rockstar games have aiming about as fluid as ice. I've rarely played a game where the aiming was as stiff. I don't normally use auto-aim on a console, but I pretty much always do on Rockstar games. These are not games you buy for tight controls. You buy them so you can strap C4 to hookers while singing that Katy Perry song about being a firework.Vrach said:Tbh I have a PS3 and I'm still waiting on a PC version. Shooters are just something I enjoy a lot more when I'm able to use a mouse and keyboard. I've played RDR on a PS3 as there's no PC version of it and I've enjoyed it... but using auto-aim (or aiming as if I was using a robot, rather than a pair of arms) took a good portion of the fun out of it. I'm also looking forward to giving the online portion a go, always wanted something like it, but I've had far better experiences with PC online communities (not fantastic either... but miles ahead still in my experience)