Astoria said:
...why don't they just put the price of the game up $10? Or is that just too logical?
Because that is something that the majority of consumers would notice before they buy and there would be a huge uproar about it. Doing it this way goes behind the consumers back while still getting paid an extra 10 dollars for the game if the consumer gets all the content on the disk. Except they don't know they've been had because they put trust into a well known company who has no history of doing these things, and does not expect the to use such shady business tactics.
Zack I will break up your quote to break it down for you piece by piece.
First off:
Zachary Amaranth said:
As it's not November 1st and you know, I'd say that's false. There clearly is a way to know. Consumers should research BEFORE purchase, not claim after the fact that they had "no way to know." If there's doubt, don't buy.
Apparently you misunderstood what I said, possibly due to my typing error of spelling "release" instead of spelling "released." What happens with Purchases on Xbox Live is that you cannot see the file size of something unless you select the content and go to the screen where it gives you the option to buy it, and there it says the file size, the description, etc. With the season pass, you are basically pre-ordering the 4 upcoming add-ons that they say in the description for the season are new downloadable content, which we have proven to be untrue because of this first one. Since the first pack doesn't "release" until November 1st, it does not appear on the Marketplace. So, as I said, there is no way to know the file size of the first DLC pack, only the file size of the season pass, which allows you to download the DLC's when they release.
Also, those of us who have been notified about this issue for a while knew that the 3 maps and the character skins were on the disk, but there was no way to know if they were going to put them as the first content pack and charge for them, which I hoped they would not because they have no history of such shady business, especially since the first DLC pack for Gears of War 2 was free for new purchases. Either that, or I hoped they would add additional maps along with the ones that were on the disk to at least make themselves look like they were giving you a deal. If they added an extra 2 maps and people would be saying "5 maps plus horde content and character skins for $10? You are awesome Epic!"
Unfortunately, the content of said pack were not revealed until yesterday, and realizing that all of that content is already on the disk, I made this thread. It angers me that Epic would do this since the maps have been done for months and were not or should not have originally been planned as dlc (blood drive is a remake, Azura was not planned as dlc since they released a teaser for Horde 2.0 a while ago, meaning the map was finished even before last June,and then tried to cover up that fact by making copyright claims on all of the youtube videos showing that fact, etc). So until yesterday, there was no positive way to know that the locked disk content was the entirety of the add-on.
Secondly:
Zachary Amaranth said:
The information was available through no extraordinary means (teh google).
Oh really now? Please show me how to find out the information on google from a major site (not a blog) people would trust, without using the word Disk Locked Content (because no normal person would search this unless they knew Gears 3 had it) and without reading the comments on an article. If you do find an article about it, is the date of the article a few days after release or just recent. From searching Gears of War 3, Gears of War 3 DLC, and Gears of War 3 First DLC, I came up with nothing on the topic of the first dlc pack's content being on the disk.As I said, you need to pretty much search for the specific problem that you would not know about before searching. So no, the information is not available through normal means, which brings me to my last point.
Zachary Amaranth said:
TBH, I'm not even sure I buy that the public is unaware of the concept, since it's generally discussed to death. So the information is out there, and those concerned should be doing their research before purchase.
See above Paragraphs.
saruman31 said:
This is not morally wrong. No people are hurt or prejudiced by this. It`s a economic thing and not a socially-political one.
Not morally wrong? Since when is taking advantage of your customers misinformation, that you facilitated, to profit off of them not morally wrong? No people are hurt? They're, in essence, buying the game twice. Most would call that a scam. And and money lost from a scam is considered as damage done. Was nobody hurt by Bernie Madoff because he misinformed and misled people to gain money off of them? You're saying that nobody was hurt by that just because it was an "economic thing"? You're right, the people who fell for that were stupid and should have done more research, and Bernie should never have gone to jail. The people who lost millions should just deal with it.