Wow, someone remembers! I actually took my time upgrading from Windows 98 to XP, because of the terrible backward compatibility (plus, Windows 98 was way more stable than the initial releases of XP).havass said:Can I just ask him to right-click?Raiyan 1.0 said:Well, Microsoft has extended support for the XP till 2015 (2 years beyond our retarded apocalypse), last I heard. If softwares stop supporting XP at any point in the future, I can safely say people can fall back on 7 - its backward compatibility has yet to fail me.havass said:Vista. I'll have to change when I buy a new laptop..but for now it's serving me well. I still think XP is the most reliable though. Pity it's getting phased out.
Hell, 7's Windows Defender has nearly made antiviruses redundant. Considering applications can't modify critical Windows system files - at least not without your permission - the OS structure is somewhat similar to the Mac OS, without being too restricting... or having a nightmarish compatibility issue.
By the way, if you have problems with your Windows and post it on any forum, you're bound to meet at least one jackass saying "You wouldn't have that problem if you were running a Mac".
Clobber him. Internet style.
Heheh. Well the problem with XP is that games of the past decade mostly don't work on them at all. Though if 7 has backward compatibility...
Good Sir, open up the Task Manager, go to the Performance Tab, compare the memory Vista uses in the background to XP's memory usage, and get ready for evasive maneuvers because the difference will throat-punch you.Sonic Doctor said:Vista.
I haven't encountered any problems with it. What are the actual problems people have? Cause it runs smooth and easy for me to use. Other than a few appearance differences, it doesn't feel much different than XP.
Some say your watch goes up to 14, and that you think the credit crunch is a new type of breakfast cereal. All we know is, you're called The Stig.TestECull said:Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP1
Windows because I game
Vista, because my onboard sound's driver pack gets stuck in install loops on 7
Ultimate because I'd rather have and not use features than need and not have them
64-bit because 32-bit is for antiques
SP1 because GTA IV requires it. If it wasn't for GTA IV I wouldn't even have that. I don't need to update. It ain't broke, so I ain't gonna fix it.
Meh, I checked. It said 2.03 of my 4GB, but then I closed my Firefox and turned off Steam. Then it said 1.77GB. But then you also have to take into account the anti-virus which I wasn't going to turn off, so that would bring it down more.Raiyan 1.0 said:Good Sir, open up the Task Manager, go to the Performance Tab, compare the memory Vista uses in the background to XP's memory usage, and get ready for evasive maneuvers because the difference will throat-punch you.Sonic Doctor said:Vista.
I haven't encountered any problems with it. What are the actual problems people have? Cause it runs smooth and easy for me to use. Other than a few appearance differences, it doesn't feel much different than XP.
True. Consoles. But this isn't about consoles. I still don't understand the appeal of a game pad over a mouse and keyboard, but to each his own.duchaked said:well lotsa console gamers too, but I suppose even us console gamers are now sitting on our butts in front of our computers surfing The Escapist lolIronman126 said:Dude, this is a GAMING site. When have you seen a Mac or Linux machine with game support? Valve titles excluded.cairocat said:Oh god! So much Winows!
I thought we were better than that, Escapist...
but THANK YOU people for not ripping other people for using a diff OS (at least I don't see any...unlike with consoles)
well you basically just said the mouse and keyboard is better but eh some ppl for some eh reason like the game controller, and most people on Xbox Live are douchebags, and Macs are only good for style, and PC gaming is better...Ironman126 said:True. Consoles. But this isn't about consoles. I still don't understand the appeal of a game pad over a mouse and keyboard, but to each his own.
And as for ripping on OSs, it's not so common knowledge that not all people on the internet are douche-bags. The vast majority, yes, especially on Xbox Live, but we here at the Escapist are generally civil.
In practical terms, Macs bug me. The price, it feels like you pay more for the name than anything, that damn jumping icon at the bottom every time i wants to tell me something, and the lack of a non-hidden bottom task bar. And the fact i can't play Crysis, Mass Effect, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. on it. Of course, PCs bug me too, but i can play ALL my games on it...
Let me clarify. I like M+K. I've used all the consoles out there and i find the controllers awkward, especially since i can't change the button mappings. They are functional, but i like my M+K better.duchaked said:well you basically just said the mouse and keyboard is better but eh some ppl for some eh reason like the game controller, and most people on Xbox Live are douchebags, and Macs are only good for style, and PC gaming is better...Ironman126 said:snip
haha well you did keep it civil =)
lol I'd give my views and opinions but I began every statement with "I think..." just to let people know it was my thoughts and not trying to say THIS IS THE TRUTH...and it was nothing people haven't heard before so neverminnnd hahaIronman126 said:Let me clarify. I like M+K. I've used all the consoles out there and i find the controllers awkward, especially since i can't change the button mappings. They are functional, but i like my M+K better.duchaked said:well you basically just said the mouse and keyboard is better but eh some ppl for some eh reason like the game controller, and most people on Xbox Live are douchebags, and Macs are only good for style, and PC gaming is better...Ironman126 said:snip
haha well you did keep it civil =)
Some people on Xbox live also double tap their broken controls with .357 Magnum revolvers... I wish i were making that up.
Macs are Macs. They look REALLY GOOD. They preform with outstanding mediocrity with the few games they can run. Please note the definition of "mediocre." It does not mean "bad" it means "in the middle" or "average." PCs on the other hand, can run everything. Again, Macs are functional, but not my style. My style involves high-end graphics and physics engines and Macs prefer making movies, surfing the web on (that most horrific of web browsers) Safari, and iTunes. Having used all three functions on a Mac and PC regularly, i can say that i dislike Win Movie Maker and iMovie, Safari and Internet Explorer, and iTunes and Zune. So lets hear it for third party software!
duchaked said:Nothings stopping you. It's possible to have a civilized argument. That's how debates work. Two points of view and the two sides debate, discuss, and consider the other sides argument.Ironman126 said:lol I'd give my views and opinions but I began every statement with "I think..." just to let people know it was my thoughts and not trying to say THIS IS THE TRUTH...and it was nothing people haven't heard before so neverminnnd hahaduchaked said:Ironman126 said:snip