I'm not sure how the question is meant. I mean the people of Earth cause a great deal of suffering and we spend much of our time on this forum discussing our ever falling faith in humanity.
Barely a thread goes by I don't see someone claiming to lose their remaining faith in humanity.
So if this thread is the people of Earth versus games than I would expect games to win.
If it's a comparison of the enjoyment of games versus enjoyment of the spectacle of Earth's natural wonders than I would expect the poll to be decided by how many nature lovers we have.
I can't imagine that the question is; "Would you rather the Earth existed or games existed?" because anyone with half a rain would realise that games cannot exist without Earth, so must vote accordingly.
If it's simply a measure of which gives me more enjoyment, and I'm going to assume it is, than games is my answer.
Barely a thread goes by I don't see someone claiming to lose their remaining faith in humanity.
So if this thread is the people of Earth versus games than I would expect games to win.
If it's a comparison of the enjoyment of games versus enjoyment of the spectacle of Earth's natural wonders than I would expect the poll to be decided by how many nature lovers we have.
I can't imagine that the question is; "Would you rather the Earth existed or games existed?" because anyone with half a rain would realise that games cannot exist without Earth, so must vote accordingly.
If it's simply a measure of which gives me more enjoyment, and I'm going to assume it is, than games is my answer.