Question of the Day, May 24, 2010

[Dogstile]

hah, 367th vote for vidjagames, pulling it above earths 366th

 

[Simalacrum]

Earth, definitely.

Its only the humans on it that I hate

 

[liveslowdiefast]

video games are awesome, but i prefer nature plain and simple.

 

[Lazy Kitty]

It will need to be big space stations though, there won't be only room needed for a few billion people to live, but also for farming grounds and forests and whatever else is needed to support life on the space-stations forever.

You realize that would take decades to build, right? That whole idea is simply impossible with our current tech...

Now, terra-forming Mars would work...

The idea is to build it with modules big enough to support at least one family each, and bigger modules for farming, industry and other things.
Then send the modules into space (preferably with the families already on board) and then connecting them.
There will of course be plant-life needed too for producing oxygen because you can't just keep going back and forth to get more.

 

[LackingSanity]

If I had to choose either a world without videogames, or a world where I could never go outside and enjoy all that the Earth has to offer, I'd choose Earth hands down.

 

[Aptspire]

Earth
also, it's pretty even so far :O

 

[Dapsen]

Shouldn't it be 'Reality v. Videogames'? or 'Real life v. Videogames'?

OT: I voted Earth. It has had far more epic story's than games. -We just can't remember most of them.

 

[Denamic]

In deep spayce, no one can hear you get a quadruple kill.

 

[daskat]

The question is weird. i was thinking, when this ask about earth, earth like what?. Like if i prefer to have earth like properties and real state?. Travel around the earth meeting people and learning about different cultures?. Like working the earth?.
Besides is not a real option for me, you can have both travel and real states and also games. It isnt like they are asking if you prefer to be drunk or sober, where one answer excludes the other. Or wet and dry.... but that wouldnt be a good example since you can be part wet and part dry... Still i prefer video games cause earth is too much responsibility, i can live knowing that i forgot to feed my sims and they died, but it would much heavier if insted of sims it would be an entire country.

 

[CarlsonAndPeeters]

when i voted it became exactly 50/50, meaning earth was losing. thats pretty sad. understandable, but sad.

 

[Xeros]

Gonna have with the Earth, the few sparkling gems of people are worth far more than any video game. And nature is nice too... I guess.

 

[Grike]

Heh, as of me voting, it's exactly 382/382

OT: Earth, for obvious reasons. The things they use to make videogames are products of the earth, therefore, no Earth = No Videogames.

Plus, I love camping...

 

[TheMonkeySlayer]

I just voted videogames for the hell of it.
But so did everyone else, so it's not funny.
Meh...

 

[Brad Shepard]

Place to live > videogames.

 

[dthvirus]

...Goddammit guys.

 

[MasterSplinter]

I use earth much more often...


(my vote made the tie 400-400, wonder who breaks it)
EDIT: or at least i think so...

 

[Johnnyallstar]

Earth. It's so much prettier than any video game.

Edit: mine made 408/408 tie

 

[Count Igor]

Earth. It's so much prettier than any video game.

Edit: mine made 408/408 tie

Lies. Mine did. (It did!)

But really? WHO votes for video games?!
We need people, don't we, especially loved ones, or else we would just fade into 30 stone 10 year olds.

 

[Redlin5_v1legacy]

The poll is at a 50/50 split at this moment, something I think is pretty unbelievable. I love our planet, its just sometimes the people who live in it beside me who really make me mad. Oh and a video game can't simulate fresh rhubarb crumble or a nice swim in a lake on a really hot day.