Question of the Day, September 29, 2010
- Thread starter The Escapist Staff
- Start date
I choose GW2 or ToR (probably not playing it though) but since those where invisible (or merely rhetorical) I went with Lego, never have enough bricks.
What I think they should do with the 40k mmo (especially since I and everyone I know who would be interested,never pay monthly fees for games; and wont even change that for a kickass 40k mmo) is have a free tier and a pay-for tier. The free tier would be for more of the horde type armies like Guard and Orks and would only allow basic foot soldiers. The pay-for tier can be for those who want more upgrades, access to exclusive areas, or the ability to play as a more elite character like a space marine or mekboy.RelexCryo said:
I'm surprised that Star Wars The Old Republic was forgetten about when this list was created, but from the listed I'm most interested in the Warhammer 40,000 MMO, partly because I'm interested to see if they've learnt from Warhammer: Age of Reckoning.
Come on, why so few votes for LEGO Universe?
Who cares what the game's like, it's freakin' LEGO.
LEGO is fucking awesome.
Who cares what the game's like, it's freakin' LEGO.
LEGO is fucking awesome.
One you didn't list on your poll: Guild Wars 2. There is virtually no chance of me playing any of the other ones as I don't play games with subscription fees (my innate love for Warhammer 40,000 will make not playing the 40K MMO physically painful, but such is my policy).
Now, if it turns out that the 40K MMO doesn't rely on a subscription model I refuse to countenance, then I will be all over that. But otherwise none of those titles are games I'm anticipating playing.
Now, if it turns out that the 40K MMO doesn't rely on a subscription model I refuse to countenance, then I will be all over that. But otherwise none of those titles are games I'm anticipating playing.