This is so true; about the only thing I'd change is that kids can be vicious in elementary school, too; in middle school, they're downright inhuman.TheNaut131 said:During elementary this can be pretty minimal and not too significant but still enough to be an issue. Around Middle School, kids tend to get a bit more vicious, don't give a fuck about anything, just want to be irritating. Now High school is truly the game changer. People are maturing, forgetting about past prejudices because they have their own shit to worry about. You have to go out of your way to truly get people to mess with you. If you have a past in any of these scenarios, than that will determine how people react.
This was my problem too. At the middle school I went to (and that's where the physical bullying happened, so it's relevant) the administrators seemed to revel in making examples out of kids they caught fighting. It didn't matter who started it or whether it was in self defense, if you got caught fighting someone, you got in serious trouble. To make it worse, a kid could easily be able to point fingers to who was doing the bullying, but since the bullies were smart enough not to leave any witnesses (or, at the very least, to make sure all witnesses were their cronies) the school did very little to curb the real problem, which was not fist fights. What's worse, in American middle schools, they have 12 year old kids in the same school, riding the same buses, as 16 year old idiots who are just passing the time until they can finally drop out. I don't care how much you try, there's no fighting back against that. High school was wonderful, because by then almost all of the bullies had dropped out of school, and the few that didn't wound up being social pariahs, since nobody wanted to put up with their crap anymore -- but middle school was hell.Mercurio128 said:Speaking for myself (but I imagine also a fair few people out there) I often tried to diffuse a difficult situation with words or didn't react because I was genuinely afraid of the consequences of any violence (i.e. suspension/ expulsion - things most bullies don't seem to care about, not the actual violence itself) when in reality, the 'best' option would have been to instantly rise to their challenge, not back down. It's just that I couldn't not think ahead. (if that makes any sense)
As for the OP's question, it's a combination of difference and poor social skills. If a kid is in some way different from the rest of the herd, they're a target. If a child has poor social skills, ditto. The problem is, constant bullying leads to terrible social skills, since the bully-ee never really gets a chance to exercise his or her social skills, and if you don't use 'em, you lose 'em (or never develop them in the first place.) Basically, getting bullied begets getting bullied worse.