Bolded the points I'm addressing.Mikaze said:I can see where you're coming from, but in a progressive and multi-faith society that seperates church and state the argument that "it's against our religion, it cannot be" argument fails to hold water, especially when marriage as a legally binding entity ceased to be religious decades ago.
The real argument seems to me to be that the conservatives want to deny homosexual couples their civil rights because they're 'evil'.
This is an unfortunate phenomenon which my father coined "the speed limit rule"
Why do we have speed limits? It's not because we don't know how to drive, it's not because we don't know the safe speed. It's for that one idiot who'll slam 'round a corner at 110 and kill poor little Jimmy, Andrew and Tom's adopted son (see what I did there?)as he plays in the front yard.
Whilst we argue that we have a "progressive and multi-faith society" there still exists a large percentage of fundamentalist religious people within the voting public.
The politicians want to be voted back in, to do this they must work to appease all of the voting public.
That's why so many politicians these days are anti-smoking (because about half of the general public don't like it) but wont try to ban tobacco (because about half the general public like it).
That's why you have people like Britney Spears making a mockery of "the sanctity of marriage" yet they refuse to allow gays to marry to protect that.