I'm glad they're deciding to take this new approach. It's no secret that the power of trade and jobs can bring people together:
actually PrinceofPersia is from the good old usa, where their rating system isn't enforced by law, it's merely advisory (which is why there's so many 13 year old yanks playing COD and annoying the crap out of everyone) because having a ratings system enforced by law would infringe on their freedoms, same reason as why they don't have to vote. In australia the rating system IS backed by the law and any store that sells/rents movies or games to someone that the rating prohibits then they can be fined (and possibly jailed but i'd have to check).axol said:He's probably just one of those 15y/o's who won't be able to get his r18+ games from the shop any more.cursedseishi said:don't mind him, I think he might very well be one of those "vocal minorities" who were against it, and have recently discovered a very fancy thing called "the internet".Andy Chalk said:How do you figure?PrinceofPersia said:LOL OMG that is the funniest thing I ever read. This poor sod really needs a fact check.
Hard to tell though.
But don't you think it's inherently difficult to support the game industry in a country with such a dysfunctional rating system? That seems to be the point O'Connor is addressing: there's a huge economic opportunity here that Australia is missing out on, in large part because of this ongoing rating fiasco.Trogdor1138 said:EDIT: Oh forgot to mention, I know people that got layed off last year from Studios closing their doors and there is a huge lack of industry activity over here. Government doesn't do shit to help out video games or see the benefits.
Yes, I do agree, that's kind of my point. This needs a lot of fixing before video games meet it's potential a full fledged industry here and there has been little to no help from the "people above".Andy Chalk said:But don't you think it's inherently difficult to support the game industry in a country with such a dysfunctional rating system? That seems to be the point O'Connor is addressing: there's a huge economic opportunity here that Australia is missing out on, in large part because of this ongoing rating fiasco.Trogdor1138 said:EDIT: Oh forgot to mention, I know people that got layed off last year from Studios closing their doors and there is a huge lack of industry activity over here. Government doesn't do shit to help out video games or see the benefits.
I might be wrong here, but I believe OFLC ratings are compulsory or the game is banned for sale. It's a nice government-enforced cash cow because it isn't cheap to try again. It's why we're not allowed to use the Indie feature on XBLA; because the games aren't officially rated (or so I hear).acosn said:I don't know how things work over in Australia, but in the US despite being decades older there's a lower rate of compliance to the age guidelines for movies than there are for video games.
Both systems are voluntarily implemented by the industry itself, and they follow almost identical criteria for ratings. In some respects the ESRB has stricter guidelines for what quantifies an "M" and "T" rating.
If people want to disregard what the ratings are telling them it's not the government's place to complain or really do anything.
We have, just a few old men who don't understand it haven't. But sooner or later we will win, even if its only because they've died of old ageLightspeedJack said:God I'm sick of hearing about this, dammit Australia just get with the times and DO IT ALREADY!!
I'm not saying that the Game industry isn't an important one, I agree with you there, what I was saying was that despite this, the Australian Game Industry has been more or less on its own in terms of help from the Government and I doubt the Government will suddenly start caring now, I would like it to, very much so, but it doesn't seem likely.Andy Chalk said:I might have to disagree with you there. Whether or not the government "cares" about gamers is one thing but given the explosive growth of the videogame industry and the serious money it can pump into local and even national economies, I think any government that actually considers the situation will give a very full fuck about it. This is big business you're talking about.rabidmidget said:You see the problem with that argument is that you assume the Australian Government gives half a fuck about our Game Industry, which I can assure you, it doesn't.
The Australian Christian Lobby actually did release a statement saying that O'Connor's argument has reduced the debate to a "farce". Their reasoning? They stated that the argument was first about the rights of adults (which it is), then it was about protecting children (which it also is), now it's about the economy (also true).Taddy said:Surprised the Christian Lobby Party didn't come back with something along the lines of "They're just desperate."
"Either make the right decision or I'll make it for you."Ultimate Evil said:Don't worry, I hear their choices are either to budge now or lose their decision-making priveliges. Presumably because they are very nearly the only people in government holding out against all this change, which doesn't feel very democratic for the rest of us.Bob the frantic said:As an Australian, I just want to say this...
If the 'making money' angle doesn't work, then the attorney-generals will never budge from their stupid position with any rational argument
The difference is, ratings in Australia are legally mandated. The classification board is appointed by the government and the government has set the definitions of the categories. It is not legal to sell content in Australia until it has been rated by the board. It is also against the law to sell a product rated for 18+ to a minor, or purchase same to give to a minor. There is nothing voluntary about it at all.acosn said:I don't know how things work over in Australia, but in the US despite being decades older there's a lower rate of compliance to the age guidelines for movies than there are for video games.
Both systems are voluntarily implemented by the industry itself, and they follow almost identical criteria for ratings. In some respects the ESRB has stricter guidelines for what quantifies an "M" and "T" rating.
If people want to disregard what the ratings are telling them it's not the government's place to complain or really do anything.
Actually, I'm fairly sure the labor government support the move for an R 18+ rating.Andy Chalk said:I might have to disagree with you there. Whether or not the government "cares" about gamers is one thing but given the explosive growth of the videogame industry and the serious money it can pump into local and even national economies, I think any government that actually considers the situation will give a very full fuck about it. This is big business you're talking about.rabidmidget said:You see the problem with that argument is that you assume the Australian Government gives half a fuck about our Game Industry, which I can assure you, it doesn't.
Fucking hate our government. I wish everyone got pissed off and overthrew the bastards already. Not to mention that on a lot of topics neither party offers anything sensible (Julia Gillard offers the NBN, but threatens to enforce internet filtering (THAT DOESNT WORK) and Tony Abbott promises no filters but loathes the NBN) And the only party to have sensible policies goes and calls themselves the "Australian Sex Party". For christs sake.LawlessSquirrel said:I really hate our system, it only takes one person to put a stop to any progress, and it only takes inactivity to push something through that wouldn't normally make it. Seriously, we're a 'democracy' in name only. Hell, we're doing great on paper, but I rarely meet someone that isn't in trouble financially nowadays.
I don't think any amount of logic and reason is going to help, when you need to be convincing the most stubborn people in Australia to get it through, and even then they can be overwritten or just feign consensus. The only way they'll budge is if they start to think their jobs are on the line...which hopefully they are, given the apparent opposition they face. And hey, appealing to greed may just be the way to get the rest of the government to start pushing.
I might be wrong here, but I believe OFLC ratings are compulsory or the game is banned for sale. It's a nice government-enforced cash cow because it isn't cheap to try again. It's why we're not allowed to use the Indie feature on XBLA; because the games aren't officially rated (or so I hear).acosn said:I don't know how things work over in Australia, but in the US despite being decades older there's a lower rate of compliance to the age guidelines for movies than there are for video games.
Both systems are voluntarily implemented by the industry itself, and they follow almost identical criteria for ratings. In some respects the ESRB has stricter guidelines for what quantifies an "M" and "T" rating.
If people want to disregard what the ratings are telling them it's not the government's place to complain or really do anything.
Thank you, that makes much more sense. It's nicely in keeping with the spirit of the Dutch saying. I'll be using your version from now on.Speakercone said:try "if you can't turn right, take three lefts." Also, I get it and I will start saying it immediately!DeadDodo said:If you can't get to your objective using right-hand turns, use left-hand turns.
Hmm... that saying doesn't translate well into English, but I'm sure you guys get the gist.
It's a load of donkey bollocks.Andy Chalk said:But don't you think it's inherently difficult to support the game industry in a country with such a dysfunctional rating system? That seems to be the point O'Connor is addressing: there's a huge economic opportunity here that Australia is missing out on, in large part because of this ongoing rating fiasco.
I prefer "two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Same point though.Speakercone said:try "if you can't turn right, take three lefts." Also, I get it and I will start saying it immediately!DeadDodo said:If you can't get to your objective using right-hand turns, use left-hand turns.
Hmm... that saying doesn't translate well into English, but I'm sure you guys get the gist.