Rapist With The Dragon Tattoo

Recommended Videos

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Treblaine said:
That's sick. There is a difference between stabbing someone once in the chest with a machete to kill them and "raping them with a machete" and YOU KNOW THAT!!!
Tell that to the people who died that way.

Treblaine said:
Being comfortable with setting fire to sweet old ladies is insane. Comfort =/= sanity.
Slippery slope of the highest ABV.

Treblaine said:
That's not the issue of "if it does or does not happen" but the morality, ethics and justice of people doing such things.
I thought I kept suggesting to actually read the books. If you don't want, wait for the next movie. What you just mentioned are completely irrelevant if you try to apply them to Lisbeth Salander.

Treblaine said:
No I haven't. I have not ever stuck anyone in anger.
Note: I never mentioned violence, much less physical. Humans share greed, vanity... In broad terms we seek self-gratification and that reflects on our judgment.

Treblaine said:
Unless if you include when I was a toddler but of course no toddler has much of a concept of right and wrong then nor nor ability to do much harm.
So you helped prove my point (instincts are natural) and I could google a list of child murderers.


Treblaine said:
So what? Are you saying it therefore doesn't matter if we have the morality of 500 years ago, of medieval torture, mass murder and daily horrors with no care?!?!?
No, I am saying that claiming to be civilized is a lie and a very egotistical thing to day. The Romans were civilized too...

Treblaine said:
"For the record, I still think that it's not rape but sexual torture."

Yeah, that's a bit like saying "I don't consider that vehicle a car, I consider it and automobile" what's the point?
A car is always an automobile. Your analogy doesn't work.

If there are two legal definitions for something, then they can be separated. I'm not a lawyer, but I know that a "justifiable homicide" can not be a "murder".



Treblaine said:
Nope, that's nothing but avoidance. You know it is a fallacy to falsely cite fallacies to hide from criticism of your argument.
Avoidance? Call it what you want. The fact is that I won't waste my time elaborating an appropriate response to personal insults and slander campaigns against me.

It would be a fallacy if you had an actual argument in there. In this case you had nothing but logical fallacies in there.


Treblaine said:
Why don't you just admit it: rape is never justifiable, permissible or to be excused.

I dare you. Say it and STICK TO IT!
"Watch out! We got a badass over here." Was that supposed to make me feel cornered like a villain in a bad film? I'm not even discussing that issue. If your plan is to introduce a whole different scope of arguments to make me contradict myself then give it up.

At most, that is a Red Herring.

Treblaine said:
because you have been EXPLICIT in excusing rape as justifiable.
No, I haven't. You're lying and you know it.