Ah combat tourettes.Palademon said:My brother gets a bit too focused on shooters, so that whenever he fires he has facial spasms.
He also has the most colourful rage I've ever heard.
Just today I've heard "Bollocksing titties!" and "You monkey-faced butlers of death!".
If you're referring to Rainbow Six: Vegas 2, I will have to pay him a visit and kick him in the head. For 'shits and giggles'. Do you have any idea how hard it is to find active, joinable games on those servers?!RuralGamer said:One of my friends loves griefing newbs; on RSV2, he kicks people who join the game for "shits and giggles", i.e. to piss them off.
I'm afraid I am that friend, not so much anymore, but when I was younger, I would frequently get really pissed at multiplayer games with my friends and turn off my consolelynx64 said:I have had a whole number of friends that have a tendency to get absolutely furious at other players in multiplayer games. It's really bad in local play because then physical violence can come into it. Or sometimes they have gotten so angry that they turned off the system so when they eventually cooled down we had to start the whole level over.
I feel like everyone must have at least one of these.
Hahaha, I know exactly what you mean. A friend of mine does this, and he gets really pissed off when I point out "Dude, you've only got 5 bullets left, you should reload."necromanzer52 said:Seeing people not reloading when there's a lull in combat annoys me to no end.
Phoenix09215 said:Skipping cutscenes on the first play through. Why?
These kids have it right. Sometimes, with the people I hang around, I feel like I'm the only one who grasps the idea of story and immersion in games. Watching someone run around the tutorial missions blasting stuff, running away while important NPCs relay important information, spazzing the camera everywhere so they miss all sorts of interesting goings-on, it's a nightmare to watch. But hey, who am I to judge on what they do? I play my way, they play theirs, as long as they enjoy it, more power to 'em.Smeggs said:AND FINALLY WE HAVE THE MOST GUILTY PARTY! THE MOST VILE OF ALL THE VILLAINS! Yes, I'm talking about FRIEND WHO SKIPS/TALKS/DOESN'T READ CUTSCENES AND SPEECH IN GAMES WE'VE NEVER PLAYED BEFORE SO I HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT'S GOING ON! That's also the reason I now play Online games in Single player first. And he wonders why I can't stand to watch him play anything.
How the hell can you even enjoy Mass Effect or Oblivion when you skip all the Background and STORY? DOES NOT COMPUTE!
I know you're joking, but all my friends badger me to play Modern Warfare.believer258 said:They don't play the all of the same games that I play. Don't they know what's good for them? And that I have no time for the games they keep talking about?
[sub][sub][sub]This is a joke, people. No, I can't recall any at the moment that really grind my gears.[/sub][/sub][/sub]
It wouldn't unbalance it because Bethesda would build the game with it in mind. A mod introducing guns into Skyrim would unbalance it.ivansnick said:As much as it would be awesome to have assult rifles (especially in an arena) I am going to say NOOOO!!!!Hides His Eyes said:Actually I have thought I would quite like to see TES enter a period equivalent to the Renaissance or the 15-1600s, and include guns. I think it would be really cool. I doubt they will do it as it would be too much of a departure, but I don't think it would necessarily be bad.
It would unbalance gameplay to an almost rediculus level. Maybe you could bring the Dwemer back and have them be all Steampunky. Or maybe you could give the high elves fire crackers (would give them reason to be arrogent). But large scale industrialisation of Nirn.
Wouldn't work unless it was done over the corse of 2-3 elder crolls games.
OT:
My friends refuse to accept that a PC can be more powerful than a console. Even if I show them the specs. Other then that though many play COD CONSTANTLY!!
SO yeah steriotypical things yet they still do them
I think it's reasonable to expect a world that is more or less equivalent to medieval times in terms of technology, to progress to become a world more or less equivalent to Renaissance times... ?krazykidd said:How would TES going into the renaissance make ANY sense? it is it's own world it is NOT Earth, whos to say there even is a renaissance?Plus TES with guns makes it a fallout game , minus the apocalypse . JUST NO !Hides His Eyes said:That first bit about Fallout and TES being set in the same universe is hilarious!ryanxm said:My friend Alex has this obsession with trying to link game series, or modernize them. Take Skyrim is a great, and recent, example. He spends two hours reading the wiki, and then decides that Fallout and Skyrim are set in the same universe because of an in game book that mentions gods bringing men and mer to Nirn from another planet. After hours of me telling him "It COULD be possible, but I'm very, very, very, very doubtful" He makes me out to be the bad guy. Claiming I was the one who kept arguing.
Another issue I have is that he always wants to modernize things. He said "Hey Ryan, wouldn't it be great is the next elder scrolls game was set in an industrial area!?". My response was "No Alex, I think that'd mess with it's fantasy setting too much. I feel that the fable games tryed this, and it worked to some extent, but I think they suffered in the long haul because of it. They seemed to rush into it too fast, not leaving room for much industrial styled progress, seeing as they'd crammed it all into fable 2".
He then tryed to convince me that Skyrim HAD to become modernized because of the fact that, in Skyrim, they had created windmills, lumber mills, grinding stones, etc. I attempted to explain to him that these things had probably been around for quite some time, and were just not showed in game, which he refused to accept. I also told him that his idea of the next Elder Scrolls having guns wouldn't work because ,aside from the game play issues I think it'd bring, it'd be *way* too far a leap for the world to suddenly have created guns, seeing as these games tend to take place 100-300 years apart each.
Sorry if way too much to read, I tend to get a bit carried away. Anyway, do any of your friends have similarly frustrating habits?
Actually I have thought I would quite like to see TES enter a period equivalent to the Renaissance or the 15-1600s, and include guns. I think it would be really cool. I doubt they will do it as it would be too much of a departure, but I don't think it would necessarily be bad.
If I am in the same room as my brother when he's playing any kind of strategy game or god game, like Total War or Civilisation, he gives a non-stop, moment-by-moment commentary on what he's doing.