Fantastic. Perhaps by the time I've taken quantum mechanics, there'll be more information on this technology and I'll have a greater understanding of it.
Ooh, a fellow quantum person, greetings and welcome to the Escapist!Hyperthetical said:No, Mr Goldman is correct, in the cat problem, the state of the cat is completely entangled with the state of the Geiger-counter/particle detector, meaning |cat> = a(t)|dead> + b(t)|alive>, a(0) = 0 and b(0) = 1, but these coefficients fluctuate with time (generally 'b' drops and 'a' increases, but, 'b' can never reach zero and 'a' can never reach 1).thethingthatlurks said:Sorry Tom, but that's a load of crap. Schroedinger's zombie feline works on the basis of probability, that is the contribution of |dead> and |alive> to |cat> (sorry for the bra-ket notation, it's just easier) is both 50% at the time of the toxin's release (As per the original thought experiment), at least until you open the box. This doesn't mean that the cat is both alive and dead, it just means that there is an equal probability of both happening. Logically speaking, the cat is alive and dead at the same time, but that cannot be the case.
/paidattentioninquantummechanicsandlikestomakethemostofit
The idea of superposition is a bit more complex than that, eg that excited states contribute to the total energy of a many particle system. By incorporating more and more excited states into your calculation (known as configuration interaction), you get more accurate results, up to an exact solution at infinitely many terms.
Cool article otherwise!
In the same way a qubit is superposition of a '0 bit' and a '1 bit' |Q> = a|0> + b|1> (these coefficients can be a little more tricky than those of the cat so we'll ignore their exact nature), so as far as simple analogy goes Tom is right.
And yes he is using the correct definition if superposition as well, your definition sounds more like perturbation expansion than superposition.
If you do not believe me, turn to the font of simple scientific knowledge that is Wikipedia.
Ah yes, you're right, although superposition and Configuration Interaction are still different, both involve summations over available states but superposition is a general principle of quantum mechanics while CI is a method of solving certain cases of the Schrodinger (bah how I hate those little dots) equation.thethingthatlurks said:I didn't get into qubits, because quantum computation is a skyscraper or two above my paygrade. Sadly a chemistry education will only get you so far in quantum theory, but I'm glad to have learned what little I have. Now that feline thing: I seem to recall that no particle can occupy two states simultaneously, which is my objection to the dead/alive scenario.
Nope, perturbation involves an outside disturbance that causes a change in the system. Configuration interaction simply takes combinations of excited states into account in calculations of multi particle systems. 'course, not all combinations are allowed (think Brillouin's theorem), but it's a fun little method otherwise.
I must admit I have only passing acquaintance with Quantum Info theories (I attended a conference on it at the end of under-grad and it was a little over my head at that stage), but I don't think you can use it for FTL communication, it's only the 'resurrection' of the information that is instantaneous, not the full propagation.Daemascus said:Couldnt this be used for faster than light comunications?
Teleportation devices are 3D printers. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. They deconstruct an object, and send the information to the receiver, then assemble an identical copy. Information is being sent, not matter, and the copy is constructed from matter contained within the "printer." So as of this type of technology, human teleportation is impossible. You will commit suicide, and the receiver will create a dead clone of you on the other end.Tom Hill said:The fastest computer in the entire world.
But when will printers become teleportation devices?
Only Information, the debate continues as to whether information is the sort of something you are probably referring to.Alon Shechter said:I'm a bit of a slow learner, so somebody help me with this...
Did they actually manage to TELEPORT something?
TBF, losing a bit of quantum information is more like converting them into a pile of fleshy mess.Tom Goldman said:" It's the Star Trek equivalent of beaming the crew down to a planet and having their organs disappear or materialize in the wrong place."
It's more a matter of size. What they've just passed across is the physical equivalent of an atom.Shia-Neko-Chan said:Or do I have the wrong understanding of how it works?
Well there goes my dreams of teleportationNieroshai said:Teleportation devices are 3D printers. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. They deconstruct an object, and send the information to the receiver, then assemble an identical copy. Information is being sent, not matter, and the copy is constructed from matter contained within the "printer." So as of this type of technology, human teleportation is impossible. You will commit suicide, and the receiver will create a dead clone of you on the other end.Tom Hill said:The fastest computer in the entire world.
But when will printers become teleportation devices?