Revenge of the Fallen Makes $200 Million

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Jon Etheridge said:
xmetatr0nx said:
Proof that business doesnt care for your nostalgia or your fanboy rage. Its just a movie strategically placed at the opening of summer. The age old summer blockbuster formula never fails, this shouldnt be a surprise.
Agreed. The movie studios also know that the vast majority of people are stupid, and will go see the movie because it's called "Transformers"

It's sad, but thats the way Hollywood works. You rarely see any new franchises starting now a days. It's all sequels, remakes, or movies based off of an already existing franchise. ...sigh.

Either way, they're not getting my hard earned cash for this piece of crap.

-Jon Etheridge
-Creator of Apocalypse Lane
You mean they made the film to make money?, thats crazy.

Sorry folks but thats the way the cookie crumbles, I like cookies that stay firm after i've dunked them in my coffee but not all cookies can manage it, sometimes you get a cookie that will stay firm and delicious even on a second dunking expodition but more often then not the cookie dough can't handle it.

Its just how hollywood works, they wanna make money as quickly as possible, so the film has to appeal to the lowest common denominator, in order to do that it has to be as simple as possible, that and cause controversy.... take the black robots, they aren't there to be liked by critics, they are their to be liked by children yet insult critics.

Did I just do a cookie analogy for liking films?, awesome.
 

MystikMtnManaT

New member
Apr 8, 2009
84
0
0
they still have a ways to go before they break the nut though, I won't be depressed so many people saw it until then
 

DigitalJedl

New member
Apr 10, 2009
419
0
0
Grand_Poohbah said:
The movie is not bad. Those of you trying to pretend to be above the awesome explosions, robot fighting, and attractive girls can just stop. You know you enjoyed it and if you say you didn't, you are a lying ************.

Time Travelling Toaster said:
I've not seen this yet, although going with how much hate it's been getting lately, I don't think I'll be going anymore >.>
Go see it in theaters. You'll enjoy the action a lot more on the big screen.
I didn't enjoy Revenge of the Fallen, I liked the first film. I love the comics, and Megan Fox is an attractive lady, but I don't like being taken as a guy who only wants to wank to MF on screen. Seriously, half that film felt like they were just pimping Megan around like the town slut.

And what was up with those two gold teeth, illiterate, Autobots? Really?

Sue me.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Jon Etheridge said:
Agreed. The movie studios also know that the vast majority of people are stupid, and will go see the movie because it's called "Transformers"
Far too true. Even as a film about Robots fighting, it's still way under par.

Tenmar said:
So never confuse something to be good just because the product is selling like crazy.
The Da Vinci Code, The Joy Of Sex, Brothers In Arms, Jet Set Willy.

People like to be told what's good so they can agree with it. Breasts, Angst, Groins and SFX sell a film far more than insightful comment, dazzling repartee or plain understanding of the franchise.

Just buy it up, slap a new title on an old story and tell people they want to see it. Even if it's atrocious, you'll still get the fans who will defend it as "Well I enjoyed it".
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
Expect the near future to hold hour and a half long Special Effects Demoreels and explosions with Shallow characters.
 

ajb924

New member
Jun 3, 2009
3,479
0
0
JenXXXJen said:
It wasn't that bad, but it was tooooooo looooong. After an hour I just didn't care anymore and my arse really hurt :(

And I don't remember any robot testicles.
Exactly, it was wayyy too long, it was a pretty good movie though. And i loved the Star Trek movie...
 

EnglishMuffin

New member
Oct 15, 2008
210
0
0
People just can't tell the difference between quality and crap anymore. Every year the movies seem to get worse and worse just like the video games. I'm sure the people who think transformers 2 is a good movie are the same people that think fallout 3 is a good game.
 

Darth Sea Bass

New member
Mar 3, 2009
1,139
0
0
Mackinator said:
Well, they made a profit in 5 days. The movie can't possibly be as bad as the reviews are - but then about 70% of sequels fail to step-up and impress people who think it can be made better than it already was.

For the record, the sequel of a sequel has even less of a chance to impress - take the Matrix Trilogy, for example.

Oh and I have no interest in seeing this movie as I couldn't have been bothered to see the first - so y'no had to point that out in case y'all thought I was some fanboy or some sh*t...
I'll take the matrix sequels over a michael bay sequel to a michael bay film any day!

Oh if this film outperforms the dark knight i'm gonna fucking hurt people!!
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,721
0
0
I can feel my childhood dying. Don't worry, little guy! Look, 2D Mario! And 2D Sonic! And remember how good Ducktales was?

Sadly I think he's on life-support. Sadly, I think the only way they can kickstart him back on his feet is by wheeling out truly showstopping animated movies based on Freakazoid, Pinky and the Brain and Animaniacs. The Tick would also suffice. Or maybe even a real-life adaptation of Batman: Mask of the Phantasm!

PS: Here's a little rant I did on the World of Warcraft forums foretelling TGJT's prophecy of Transformers 2 sucking Devastator's wrecking balls (warning, I do get a bit off-topic and talk about how I hated the 90s Godzilla movie as well):

The Great JT said:
It. Will. Suck.

I didn't like the first Transformers flick for the same reason I won't like the second: It's centered around the humans. Transformers is supposed to be about gigantic alien robots beating the hexidecimal code out of each other. Instead it goes exposition, exposition, exposition, exposition, pretty kickass action sequence involving the Autobots and Decepticons. True, humanity's been supplanted into the series before, but the humans have always been downplayed into sidekicks, and the action has ALWAYS been about the robots. Instead, it's pretty much Shia LeBouf being a socially-awkward douchebag wannabe who stumbles across the Autobots and they become his personal bodyguard service. I don't wanna see Shia LeBastard, I want to see giant alien robots kicking the spark plugs out of each other!

This is exactly what happened with Godzilla back in the 90s, all they do is talk about the King of the Monsters, and then we get a lame series of action scenes involving a T-Rex who's supposed to be Godzilla but instead looks like a pushover. Godzilla shoulda been like this: nuclear tests awaken Godzilla, he rampages through New York, everyone and everything is royally f*%ked up or crushed neath his mighty tread, people talk about how to stop Godzilla, military says 'screw it we will do it ourselves' and goes to stop him, Godzilla kicks the military's ass, one of Godzilla's enemies show up (I'll say King Gidorah for reference), they fight, Godzilla kicks King Gidorah's ass, New York City in ruins, movie over. I mean, Godzilla didn't look anything LIKE Godzilla, he didn't use his atomic breath or his fire breath (yeah, that explosion near his face is NOT fire breath) and he didn't even fight another monster! Lord knows they have enough to pick from: Rodan, King Gidorah, Mothra, the list goes on. And is a lame CGI effect the best they could come up with for His Royal Monstrosity? That thing is so lame I woulda preferred a guy in a rubber suit. Plus, Godzilla is supposed to be 400 feet tall, that thing couldn't have been bigger than 160. And how does a 400-foot, (I assume) 600,000-ton mutant dinosaur with atmoic breath get tangled in a measly little extention bridge?! He shoulda either crushed it under his foot or ripped it apart like a wet piece of paper. Also, the military kills him! That's not supposed to happen. Rule one of Godzilla movies is THE MILITARY CAN'T DO S*%T TO STOP GODZILLA. And the acting is terrible, I really woulda preferred a japanese dub to that understandable ear sodomy.

Wasn't I talking about something else earlier?

Oh right, Transformers 2. I already said why it'll suck because of the humans, but let's talk about the robots. AKA, the real reason we get suckered into theaters to see this pimple on the ass of cinema. Let's get something straight, okay, the CGI effect on the robots is great. That said, I have some complaints. One, they never use guns. Who thought this was a good idea? They're super-technological robots and they're fistfighting?! Did anyone see the original show? They all used laser guns! Hell, Megatron WAS a f*%king gun when he was first concieved (Decieved? Sorry, horrible pun.), and at most he shoots tank rounds? Again, these are super-hi-tech robots from outer space, THAT'S THE MAIN REASON WHY THEY SHOOT LASERS. Second, Why do they have wires hanging out? I could understand scratches, dents and cracks, those come with the territory of fighting a robot war. But hanging wires that could be connected to your power source?! Give me a break. Third, there's the fact THEY HAVE NO PERSONALITIES. The only one I have seen have one is Optimus Prime and the others are just stock and stereotypes. Finally, there's my least favorite part about this movie: the robots are all product-placements. They made a transformer out of a Mountain Dew machine, a Nokia cell phone and numerous cars from numerous makers. They really shouldn't be slinging product. Now I could understand a car being in the background, like the dealership lot is a backdrop for a fight, but when you're making robots out of these stupid objects, it's nonsense. Ok, I'd be willing to accept the Autobots disguising themselves as real-life cars, but seriously, not the cell phone and the vending machine.
Rust in peace, Transformers. And Michael Bay, the world isn't big enough for you to hide in from the scorn of the faithful TRUE (and by that I mean animated) Transformers fans for your wreched abominations you dare to call movies.
 

Ancientgamer

New member
Jan 16, 2009
1,346
0
0
I believe it was Stanly Kubrick who said "Perhaps it is dark cynicism, but hollywood has realized a bad movie can be just as much a success as a great one. Making it much harder for film makers to practice their art."
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
EnglishMuffin said:
People just can't tell the difference between quality and crap anymore.
Now correct me if I'm wrong but you're a person. As a person, several entities similar to yourself (perhaps with the same opinion on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen) would collectively be referred to as "people." Therefore, if your own argument is to be believed, you can no longer tell the difference between "quality and crap."

Therefore, I believe your best course of action for the immediate future would be to shut the frack up and go watch Casablanca or play Half-Life or something. Unless of course more compelling reasons (reasons in general really) can be formulated as to why your opinion should be arbitrarily held as more valid than the majority opinion of the general populous. Or perhaps that concept can be dropped entirely so that true discussion betwixt two or more equals can be accomplished.

EDIT:

The Great JT said:
I can feel my childhood dying. Don't worry, little guy! Look, 2D Mario! And 2D Sonic! And remember how good Ducktales was?

Sadly I think he's on life-support. Sadly, I think the only way they can kickstart him back on his feet is by wheeling out truly showstopping animated movies based on Freakazoid, Pinky and the Brain and Animaniacs. The Tick would also suffice. Or maybe even a real-life adaptation of Batman: Mask of the Phantasm!

PS: Here's a little rant I did on the World of Warcraft forums foretelling TGJT's prophecy of Transformers 2 sucking Devastator's wrecking balls (warning, I do get a bit off-topic and talk about how I hated the 90s Godzilla movie as well):

The Great JT said:
It. Will. Suck.

I didn't like the first Transformers flick for the same reason I won't like the second: It's centered around the humans. Transformers is supposed to be about gigantic alien robots beating the hexidecimal code out of each other. Instead it goes exposition, exposition, exposition, exposition, pretty kickass action sequence involving the Autobots and Decepticons. True, humanity's been supplanted into the series before, but the humans have always been downplayed into sidekicks, and the action has ALWAYS been about the robots. Instead, it's pretty much Shia LeBouf being a socially-awkward douchebag wannabe who stumbles across the Autobots and they become his personal bodyguard service. I don't wanna see Shia LeBastard, I want to see giant alien robots kicking the spark plugs out of each other!

This is exactly what happened with Godzilla back in the 90s, all they do is talk about the King of the Monsters, and then we get a lame series of action scenes involving a T-Rex who's supposed to be Godzilla but instead looks like a pushover. Godzilla shoulda been like this: nuclear tests awaken Godzilla, he rampages through New York, everyone and everything is royally f*%ked up or crushed neath his mighty tread, people talk about how to stop Godzilla, military says 'screw it we will do it ourselves' and goes to stop him, Godzilla kicks the military's ass, one of Godzilla's enemies show up (I'll say King Gidorah for reference), they fight, Godzilla kicks King Gidorah's ass, New York City in ruins, movie over. I mean, Godzilla didn't look anything LIKE Godzilla, he didn't use his atomic breath or his fire breath (yeah, that explosion near his face is NOT fire breath) and he didn't even fight another monster! Lord knows they have enough to pick from: Rodan, King Gidorah, Mothra, the list goes on. And is a lame CGI effect the best they could come up with for His Royal Monstrosity? That thing is so lame I woulda preferred a guy in a rubber suit. Plus, Godzilla is supposed to be 400 feet tall, that thing couldn't have been bigger than 160. And how does a 400-foot, (I assume) 600,000-ton mutant dinosaur with atmoic breath get tangled in a measly little extention bridge?! He shoulda either crushed it under his foot or ripped it apart like a wet piece of paper. Also, the military kills him! That's not supposed to happen. Rule one of Godzilla movies is THE MILITARY CAN'T DO S*%T TO STOP GODZILLA. And the acting is terrible, I really woulda preferred a japanese dub to that understandable ear sodomy.

Wasn't I talking about something else earlier?

Oh right, Transformers 2. I already said why it'll suck because of the humans, but let's talk about the robots. AKA, the real reason we get suckered into theaters to see this pimple on the ass of cinema. Let's get something straight, okay, the CGI effect on the robots is great. That said, I have some complaints. One, they never use guns. Who thought this was a good idea? They're super-technological robots and they're fistfighting?! Did anyone see the original show? They all used laser guns! Hell, Megatron WAS a f*%king gun when he was first concieved (Decieved? Sorry, horrible pun.), and at most he shoots tank rounds? Again, these are super-hi-tech robots from outer space, THAT'S THE MAIN REASON WHY THEY SHOOT LASERS. Second, Why do they have wires hanging out? I could understand scratches, dents and cracks, those come with the territory of fighting a robot war. But hanging wires that could be connected to your power source?! Give me a break. Third, there's the fact THEY HAVE NO PERSONALITIES. The only one I have seen have one is Optimus Prime and the others are just stock and stereotypes. Finally, there's my least favorite part about this movie: the robots are all product-placements. They made a transformer out of a Mountain Dew machine, a Nokia cell phone and numerous cars from numerous makers. They really shouldn't be slinging product. Now I could understand a car being in the background, like the dealership lot is a backdrop for a fight, but when you're making robots out of these stupid objects, it's nonsense. Ok, I'd be willing to accept the Autobots disguising themselves as real-life cars, but seriously, not the cell phone and the vending machine.
Rust in peace, Transformers. And Michael Bay, the world isn't big enough for you to hide in from the scorn of the faithful TRUE (and by that I mean animated) Transformers fans for your wreched abominations you dare to call movies.

Different is not synonymous with crappy. Battlestar Galactica is a fine example.

Also it seems that the Transformers can easily repair any damage so long as a major part has not fallen off, not really any huge motivation for having armor. And show me a picture of an undamaged Transformer with exposed wiring please.

Finally the product placement in these movies has been hugely overblown by pissy fanboys. The Autobots are all real vehicles (which as you said isn't so bad), Frenzy disguises as a cell phone (I forget the brand) to follow Sam (a sensible tactic), a Nokia cell phone is used to demonstrate the Cube's power (the brand is only made known as part of a joke), and in a few seconds of comic relief an Xbox 360 and Mountain Dew vending machine are turned into Decepticons by a pulse of energy from the Cube. Doesn't really intrude much, a prolonged blink could make you miss the last two for crying out loud!
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
nilcypher said:
Revenge Of The Fallen Makes $200 Million


Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen has made its money back, and in just five days.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, the sequel to the hit 2007 movie, cost a whopping $200 million to make, a pretty steep threshold to get over before the movie makes a profit. So how long to you think it'll take before it breaks even, two weeks, maybe a month?

Try five days.

The movie's terrible reviews, including one from our very own MovieBob [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escape-to-the-movies/797-Transformers-Revenge], hasn't kept the crowds away, and the movie has made an estimated $201.2 million in the five days since it opened in the US on Wednesday, already putting the movie in the black and nipping at the heels of The Dark Knight. Of course, that total doesn't include the UK or Japan, where the film opened last week, so Paramount and Hasbro are probably grining like Cheshire Cats right now, especially seeing as they conservatively predicted $130 - $150 million.

It looks like Revenge of the Fallen is well on its way to being the biggest movie of the year, a title currently held by the new Star Trek movie, which grossed $246 million in seven weeks. I'll be over here, weeping for my childhood.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i2c0d30928617f5ec8d85a5d2ba00e1ef]


Permalink
In related news, people will swallow strangers cocks if you tell them its a real action remake of their childhood favorite tv or comic.

Eldritch Warlord said:
EnglishMuffin said:
People just can't tell the difference between quality and crap anymore.
Now correct me if I'm wrong but you're a person. As a person, several entities similar to yourself (perhaps with the same opinion on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen) would collectively be referred to as "people." Therefore, if your own argument is to be believed, you can no longer tell the difference between "quality and crap."

Therefore, I believe your best course of action for the immediate future would be to shut the frack up and go watch Casablanca or play Half-Life or something. Unless of course more compelling reasons (reasons in general really) can be formulated as to why your opinion should be arbitrarily held as more valid than the majority opinion of the general populous. Or perhaps that concept can be dropped entirely so that true discussion betwixt two or more equals can be accomplished.
Most people get defensive abotu movies like this doing well because the more movies like these do well the less you will see real quality films being made. Overall it coincides with the ever decreasing level of education in the US as a whole. It's no small surprise that the Wii (a system I do like amongst its competitors) has garnered such support the more it dumbs down its games, people are slowly being taught that any sort of challenge to them intellectually is a bad thing.

I mean calling someone an elitist actually has a negative tone in the US. "Who wants an elitist running their school system?" "Ugh...I do? The whole point of getting a college education is so you don't run around sounding retarded and bashing on people who took the time and effort to better themselves."
 

sallene

New member
Dec 11, 2008
461
0
0


Here, I brought this since i figured everyone else was bringing so much whine.


Oh no, a michael bay movie made money, BFD.



People always act so butt-hurt about this shit its rediculous.

We live in a country where almost as many people(if not more) vote for american idol than do elections of goverment officials, Where consumerism is king and we are fed a steady diet of what we should be buying/watching/reading next to be cool/in touch.



I at least realize for what it is, I went, I turned off my higher brain functions for an afternoon and settled down to some explosions and giant robots and big guns and pew pewness.

When I want to see something serious and though provoking there are a number of indie films that are backlogged that I have yet to get too but the american cinema has forever been about escapsim, which I find it ironic that people are bitching about escapism on a site called the escapist.


If you look back to the 50s and 60s to the really bad sci-fi movies that were making money its not hard to see why movies like transformers 2 are successful regardless of quality or what critics say about them. Let people have their escapism without getting twisted out of shape. This does not affect you in any physical or emotional way(except in the drama queen "their raping my childhood" argument).



Hell, at least michael bay doesnt diddle drugged up 13 year olds, though maybe if he did he would turn out a masterpeice like the pianist and get an academy award like polanski has.


Sorry, this is getting a bit rantish and I apologize for that, but this bitching about transformers is getting about as old hat as all the douchbaggery sympathy outpouring for michael jackson.



Is transformers 2 a masterpeice? No
Will it win any awards for the story? No
Will it make lots of money like it was specifically made to do? yes.


Dont like it, dont watch it. Although with this at least I am sure that all the transformer worriers now know what it feels like for all the trekkers that were crying a river over the abrams star trek.
 

DarkRyter

New member
Dec 15, 2008
3,077
0
0
Oh, how interesting, a summer blockbuster sequel to a summer blockbuster has made a large amount of money.

TRANSFORMERS

IT BUSTS BLOCKS.