The main difference is SMAS was released twice while those two collections were released once. Couple that with the ease of being able to play all the titles in their collections without having to hunt down each one and you'll find that you're just laughing in ignorance. Also, there are people who enjoy the games in the collections who didn't happen to buy any of the separate disks, so they would love such collections. Don't forget about them.mjc0961 said:I just find it hilarious that so many people think that this is a ripoff, but Sony puts out God of War Collection and Sly Collection and everyone says "Thank you!" and throws their money away. They don't even have the graphics upgrade that All Stars has over the original versions, they just press the widescreen and upscale buttons, toss in trophies and call it a day. I don't know about the Sly games, but for the God of War titles they didn't even press the upscale button on all of the content. Half the cutscenes would suddenly look like you were playing an original SNES on your HDTV. So not only is it nothing more than a simple port, but it's also a lazy port. And it's also a port of games for a system that you can still buy new in stores. At least Nintendo has the excuse that you can't pick up a brand new SNES and find a copy of All Stars in the GameStop used games section. And yeah the NES versions are on the VC, so if you don't care about the graphics you can save some money, but if you do then All Stars is here for you and you aren't about to get it anywhere else for Wii. The only thing Sony can say for their collections is "Yeah we took out the ability to play these games on their original discs so now you can just buy these games all over again! And while you're at it, here's the PSP Go, get one of those and re-buy your PSP collection from us as well."
So yeah. I just don't get why Nintendo gets blasted for re-releasing a game you can't your hands on easily, but Sony does the same thing with games that aren't that hard to find and people act like they are awesome when in reality it is Sony that's really ripping people off.
Hell, they likely had access to the NSMBW engine and assets. It shouldn't be all that hard to duplicate levels from the original.Spot1990 said:You think they'd at least have given it a 2.5D update like Sonic 4. Something to justify the existence of this lazy cash grab.
PS2 collections are re-mastered with 2x anti-aliasing and run at a locked 60 frames-per-second. Hell, the Sly Collection even has move support. You can't compare what Sony did to the way Nintendo just slapped some NES games on a disc and called it a day.mjc0961 said:I just find it hilarious that so many people think that this is a ripoff, but Sony puts out God of War Collection and Sly Collection and everyone says "Thank you!" and throws their money away. They don't even have the graphics upgrade that All Stars has over the original versions, they just press the widescreen and upscale buttons, toss in trophies and call it a day. I don't know about the Sly games, but for the God of War titles they didn't even press the upscale button on all of the content. Half the cutscenes would suddenly look like you were playing an original SNES on your HDTV. So not only is it nothing more than a simple port, but it's also a lazy port. And it's also a port of games for a system that you can still buy new in stores. At least Nintendo has the excuse that you can't pick up a brand new SNES and find a copy of All Stars in the GameStop used games section. And yeah the NES versions are on the VC, so if you don't care about the graphics you can save some money, but if you do then All Stars is here for you and you aren't about to get it anywhere else for Wii. The only thing Sony can say for their collections is "Yeah we took out the ability to play these games on their original discs so now you can just buy these games all over again! And while you're at it, here's the PSP Go, get one of those and re-buy your PSP collection from us as well."
So yeah. I just don't get why Nintendo gets blasted for re-releasing a game you can't your hands on easily, but Sony does the same thing with games that aren't that hard to find and people act like they are awesome when in reality it is Sony that's really ripping people off.
Oh so true. I've played Super Mario Allstars for as long as I've played videogames (first videogame evaar), and I still haven't beat it.CrystalShadow said:Wait, what? Have you actually played any of these games? Without taking the shortcuts that is?Spot1990 said:Not to mention the fact that the entire SMAS is about five hours of gameplay.
OK, this isn't in this collection, but Super Mario World serves a decent example.
If you take the shortest route to the end game, you can finish it in <30 minutes.
If you play it through though...
The same logic applies to the older games.
Super Mario Bros - taking the warp to world 8 will cut out 90% of the game. But how does that count?
OK, there are about 24 stages, and they're designed to take 2 minutes to play if you can do them flawlessly.
But I doubt anyone's going to be that good unless they've played it a lot already.
Anyway... 5 hours. Huh. That just seems unlikely for all but the most inhumanly good players.
I will personally smite anyone who hits yo for that.tehannihalator said:So Sony does what Nintendon't?
Please don't hit me.