i was playing this at my friends house... i fluffed it up, but then he took the wheel and subsequently killed 20 soldiers, hijacked a helicopter and destroyed a hive. and it looked freakin' awesome.
I thinkRednog said:Serious question in reference to Alex Mercer, Warning huge plot spoilers:
So I've noticed that almost every review both professional and not refers to the main character as Alex Mercer, and he is often described as an amnesiac and an evil/anti hero. I understand that for reviews that are meant to be spoiler free this is ok, but in reviews that have spoilers no one mentions that Alex Mercer is dead and you're really Blacklight, a virus that Alex took as insurance when he tried to take down Gentek. And in a desperate attempt Alex threw the virus to the ground condemning the city/world as he was gunned down by plain clothes assasins, but in a twist of events Blacklight absorbed Alex in the same manner as the game lets you absorb other people throughout the game. Because of this it really isn't an amnesiac, it doesn't have the memories in the first place beyond its creation. And it is a bit hard to bring up morality in terms of something that really isn't human, do I say a virus that kills people is evil? I really don't think so.
Why do I bring this up? From the web of intrigues Alex Mercer was a douche. He was a selfish jerk who didn't think of anyone but himself and tried to take down humanity with himself (hell even Blacklight says at one point that Mercer committed an unforgivable act. Hell the virus cared more to save his sister than the real guy, Alex Mercer didn't give a rat's ass about his sister considering he didn't see her for years even though they were in the same city. In the end Blacklight does actually do some actions that can be seen as "good", and recognizes that him ending a lot of lives probably wasn't the best thing he could have done. Thus I think that the distinction should be made, it reminds me of the whole Frankenstein and "the creature" problem. Every one refers to the creature as Frankenstein when they are in fact two separate individuals, and in both cases the creatures are very flexible in terms of their morality.
Anyways /endrant.
Poor Alex, who's cursed with awesome [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main.CursedWithAwesome]. Feel his pain, man.pantsoffdanceoff said:Also, why is he so pissed HE HAS SUPER POWERS. Sure they didn't ask him first but whatever no on has to ask to give me tons of money, they can just go ahead.
Funny you should say this I actually thought this game was infamous. I had forgotten the name of infamous.Macar said:but when I look at them Infamous and Prototype seem to have more than a few similarities.
Oh I know its like the fictional military in this game suddenly discovered black magic those missles seemed to come out of thin air.pedrakhan said:got bored of being gang raped by all the missiles and heli's
If your not being sarcastic that sounds a lot like saints row 2. Except in Saint's row your limited to cheats in being able to survive long falls. From the way Prototype is like, your practically a immortal douche as versus an annoying douche.RAKtheUndead said:Let's see: Well, I just bought a game where I can have a helicopter face off against another helicopter in an epic dogfight, HALO drop behind enemy lines and even race tractors. I think that wins the coolness award face-down against your crippled sandbox.Operations said:Penny Arcade today offers some advice on if you should buy it.
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/6/19/
I thought that, until I realised that it is so samey, then I decided that I hated it.CoverYourHead said:I love this game! You can have so much fun in it.
That second thread indicates that there will be no DLC - now, I posit that there is a vast difference between patches, mods and DLC. Mods are fan created, which do not count in your argument, and which the dev said they are looking forward to seeing - thus indicating that there will be an encouragement of fan modding. The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.Abedeus said:What? Oblivion had few releases, THOUSANDS OF HUNDREDS mods, Assassin's Creed was huge and DID get a patch, MGS4 was (from what I've heard) along with GoW pretty big too.Nerdfury said:Wait, so you and others are pissed and dismissing this game as a purchase because devs aren't releasing additional content? I mean, Assassin's Creed had no additional content to my knowledge, but people bought it happily. Neither did Unchartered, Oblivion (at least not on PS3, no DLC that got released on Australia), MGS4, God of War - the list goes on. Is DLC all that matters to you people now? SO much so that you'll dismiss a game if it has to be based on its own, stand-alone merits?Abedeus said:Activision forum.Psychosocial said:Sources?Abedeus said:Rent it.
Developers are not going to release any patch or DLC in the future. Ever. Only Prototype 2.
http://forums.activision.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=2758
Outrage after finding out there will be no further content or anything with the game.
And here a dude that got a PM answer from one of the devs.
http://forums.activision.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=2748
How nice of them, they'll keep giving assets (stock shares or what?), videos (of the game we already have), news (none), artwork (woop-dee-doo, worth $50?) and more videos. How great, at least if they don't give us CONTENT we won't overload from fun. Because they really value the community. $50 a head.
You know what also means no support? NO PATCHES. Read my other post. You have a stuttering mouse problems? NO PATCH FOR YOU. Resolution problem? NO PATCH. Laggy framework on a nice PC? NO PATCH SUCKER, WE ENJOY YOUR $50 NOW, BYE BYE.
God, young gamers are such a bunch of whining, unsatisfied rejects sometimes.
Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.I've been playing since 1996. That's not young, as you might call Diablo 1 young. So shut up if you are misinformed and ignorant.
Welcome to The Escapist, Johnson. As part of an ongoing requirement of forum etiquette, per the forum guidelines, please keep your comments to single threads when you have multiple replies - rather than posting them separately one after the other.johnsom said:Just to give you an idea of how easy this game was I played reclined with my keyboard on my lap and the monitor 5 feet away while watching tv at 15fps when I was alone on top of a building(The game is poorly optimized on the pc). Apart from the magic missiles that appear miraculously midway in the game, and even they were more of an anoyance then a danger, nothing and I mean nothing in this game was a challenge.
Okay, how about you go to Kitchen Country Buffet or yell at skateboarders.Nerdfury said:Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.
There are other threads, but if you weren't an ignorant prick, you would simply go to Activision forums and see, that developers simply don't give a shit about the community. They haven't responded to ANY of the threads, despite saying it many times how they love the community and so on.The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.
I'll let you pretend to have your internet victory here, because there's clearly no arguing with kids that have grown up thinking that DLC is a required 'standard' after releasing games and think that argumentum ad hominem is a great way to present the pro- argument.Abedeus said:Okay, how about you go to Kitchen Country Buffet or yell at skateboarders.Nerdfury said:Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.
I did play before (SNES), but Diablo is the only game I remember from that time. That, and Mario, Contra, Jungle Book (;d), Alladin, Smurfs... and some crappy demo versions of games I wouldn't touch.
Point is - ad hoc arguments suck.
There are other threads, but if you weren't an ignorant prick, you would simply go to Activision forums and see, that developers simply don't give a shit about the community. They haven't responded to ANY of the threads, despite saying it many times how they love the community and so on.The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.
FACE IT - Games changed. If they didn't, we would still be in the 8-bit era, where you couldn't tell apart an eye from a leg, and gameplay was as complicated as making coffee.
Today, DLC, patches, post-release support is a STANDARD. So you get more SALES. And if week after release you tell players you won't support the game (SUPPORT = PATCHES TOO), that's a dick move.
I didn't grow up thinking that DLC is required.Nerdfury said:I'll let you pretend to have your internet victory here, because there's clearly no arguing with kids that have grown up thinking that DLC is a required 'standard' after releasing games and think that argumentum ad hominem is a great way to present the pro- argument.Abedeus said:Okay, how about you go to Kitchen Country Buffet or yell at skateboarders.Nerdfury said:Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.
I did play before (SNES), but Diablo is the only game I remember from that time. That, and Mario, Contra, Jungle Book (;d), Alladin, Smurfs... and some crappy demo versions of games I wouldn't touch.
Point is - ad hoc arguments suck.
There are other threads, but if you weren't an ignorant prick, you would simply go to Activision forums and see, that developers simply don't give a shit about the community. They haven't responded to ANY of the threads, despite saying it many times how they love the community and so on.The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.
FACE IT - Games changed. If they didn't, we would still be in the 8-bit era, where you couldn't tell apart an eye from a leg, and gameplay was as complicated as making coffee.
Today, DLC, patches, post-release support is a STANDARD. So you get more SALES. And if week after release you tell players you won't support the game (SUPPORT = PATCHES TOO), that's a dick move.
So you can't stand to an argument without writing in caps, and so you resort to accusing me of trolling, then telling me you reported me for it? That's sad.Abedeus said:I didn't grow up thinking that DLC is required.Nerdfury said:I'll let you pretend to have your internet victory here, because there's clearly no arguing with kids that have grown up thinking that DLC is a required 'standard' after releasing games and think that argumentum ad hominem is a great way to present the pro- argument.Abedeus said:Okay, how about you go to Kitchen Country Buffet or yell at skateboarders.Nerdfury said:Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.
I did play before (SNES), but Diablo is the only game I remember from that time. That, and Mario, Contra, Jungle Book (;d), Alladin, Smurfs... and some crappy demo versions of games I wouldn't touch.
Point is - ad hoc arguments suck.
There are other threads, but if you weren't an ignorant prick, you would simply go to Activision forums and see, that developers simply don't give a shit about the community. They haven't responded to ANY of the threads, despite saying it many times how they love the community and so on.The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.
FACE IT - Games changed. If they didn't, we would still be in the 8-bit era, where you couldn't tell apart an eye from a leg, and gameplay was as complicated as making coffee.
Today, DLC, patches, post-release support is a STANDARD. So you get more SALES. And if week after release you tell players you won't support the game (SUPPORT = PATCHES TOO), that's a dick move.
I grew up in a country where you had to wait a LONG time before you got Internet, cheap games and affordable PC parts. I grew up on expansion packs after a year or half, but mostly on the fact that in these days, DLC is common and PATCHES ARE MANDATORY.
Reported for trolling, grandpa. Stop living in the past and look at today's market.
That's what I'm talking about. I used caps so you will finally notice it. Thankfully, it worked.Nerdfury said:So you can't stand to an argument without writing in caps, and so you resort to accusing me of trolling, then telling me you reported me for it? That's sad.Abedeus said:I didn't grow up thinking that DLC is required.Nerdfury said:I'll let you pretend to have your internet victory here, because there's clearly no arguing with kids that have grown up thinking that DLC is a required 'standard' after releasing games and think that argumentum ad hominem is a great way to present the pro- argument.Abedeus said:Okay, how about you go to Kitchen Country Buffet or yell at skateboarders.Nerdfury said:Ah ha ha! Bless your little cotton socks. Diablo? Young? Diablo was released in 1996, kid. That might be 'old' to sprites like yourself but it's really, really not. Oh dear, you gave me a chuckle.
I did play before (SNES), but Diablo is the only game I remember from that time. That, and Mario, Contra, Jungle Book (;d), Alladin, Smurfs... and some crappy demo versions of games I wouldn't touch.
Point is - ad hoc arguments suck.
There are other threads, but if you weren't an ignorant prick, you would simply go to Activision forums and see, that developers simply don't give a shit about the community. They haven't responded to ANY of the threads, despite saying it many times how they love the community and so on.The dev's PM indicated no DLC, which is not equal to no patches. Perhaps you aught to get your terminology right there before you pull on your big boy boots.
FACE IT - Games changed. If they didn't, we would still be in the 8-bit era, where you couldn't tell apart an eye from a leg, and gameplay was as complicated as making coffee.
Today, DLC, patches, post-release support is a STANDARD. So you get more SALES. And if week after release you tell players you won't support the game (SUPPORT = PATCHES TOO), that's a dick move.
I grew up in a country where you had to wait a LONG time before you got Internet, cheap games and affordable PC parts. I grew up on expansion packs after a year or half, but mostly on the fact that in these days, DLC is common and PATCHES ARE MANDATORY.
Reported for trolling, grandpa. Stop living in the past and look at today's market.
Patches and DLC may be common, but when a game is released working they are not, and will never be mandatory. Patches are only 'mandatory' when there are glitches in the game or things need to be fixed. When a developer makes the effort to release a game and they make it so it plays fine, the standalone game is all that is required.
DLC may be some kind of 'standard' for you and people like you, but no dev is 'required' to release anything beyond the standalone game. Hell, they're not even required to release patches or updates to fix things. I've yet to hear any friends of mine report such issues with Prototype. Why fix what ain't broken? Because it ain't broken.
Today's developers are yesterday's oldschool gamers, and while DLC may be becoming more widely available thanks to broadband internet and such, creating a fully finished, entertaining, standalone game requires no DLC and maybe you should learn to be satisfied with games that took a lot of effort to create rather than getting sniffy because there's no bonus extra crap available.