Review: Saw

LiftYourSkinnyFists

New member
Aug 15, 2009
912
0
0
Susan Arendt said:
Vlane said:
Susan Arendt said:
Oh, really? You're going to punch me in the face? Good to know.
Damn it. Why do you have to respond? I can't hurt you.

Susan Arendt said:
which are horror, whether you like them or not
No The Exorcist is a horror movie. The Saw series belongs to the torture porn genre or snuff movies. You watch a Saw movie to see the death scenes, which are good, but you don't watch them to get scared and I have no idea how you can get scared watching that.
You seem to have a very specific view of what constitutes a horror movie. I certainly agree that The Exorcist is a horror movie, but the Saw films - gratuitous though they may be - certainly qualify, as well. [cut] in much the same way that the original Halloween (one of the best horror movies of all time, IMO), ushered in the 80s glut of slasher flicks. Horror films are cyclic - the popularity of The Ring created the PG-13 horror genre, leading to movies being cut specifically to fit that rating.
What actually qualifies SAW as a Horror, I can understand Halloween and The Ring being more atmospherically based alongside tension build ups etc.

SAW is pretty much

1. Puppeteer who has as much anger vs the world as an angsty teenage girl except has the means to carry out his plans.
2. Dark Dreary atmosphere
3. Over the top, unnecessary gore filler
4. Terrible writing and acting
5. A movie for kids below the age of 17.
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
Vlane said:
Susan Arendt said:
Oh, really? You're going to punch me in the face? Good to know.
Damn it. Why do you have to respond? I can't hurt you.

Susan Arendt said:
which are horror, whether you like them or not
No The Exorcist is a horror movie. The Saw series belongs to the torture porn genre or snuff movies. You watch a Saw movie to see the death scenes, which are good, but you don't watch them to get scared and I have no idea how you can get scared watching that.
You get off on bloody neck stumps?

Most of us care about our fellow human being enough at least be afraid FOR them. Saw is horror weather you like it or not.

After all, horror is an evolving genre. Saw is just different horror.
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
Alone Disciple said:
Well, I know reviews are subjective, and I usually judge games on aggregates and averages. I'm a bit surprised you commented on the puzzles as most all other reviewers say after you figured out the first few puzzles, you more or less figured them all out....Rinse and repeat...Did you notice that when you played?

GR gave it a 67%
Metacritic a 64%
And even OXM who usually gives ridiculously higher scores for once gave it a 4.5/10.
There is a lot of repetition to the puzzles, yeah. Even one that aren't specific repeats are very similar thematically. But I still thought they were clever, on the whole. I personally appreciated a more "in your head" approach, as opposed to running from zombies and shooting everything in sight. (Not that I don't love those games, too.)

Think of it as more of an "E for Effort" than actually "this game is high quality," if you like, as that's more accurate.
 

Catchy Slogan

New member
Jun 17, 2009
1,931
0
0
If it's anything like the first Saw movie, then I might buy it. I didn't relly like any of the movies past number 2, and that was pushing it a bit.
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
WHENTWOTRIBESGOTOWAR said:
Susan Arendt said:
Vlane said:
Susan Arendt said:
Oh, really? You're going to punch me in the face? Good to know.
Damn it. Why do you have to respond? I can't hurt you.

Susan Arendt said:
which are horror, whether you like them or not
No The Exorcist is a horror movie. The Saw series belongs to the torture porn genre or snuff movies. You watch a Saw movie to see the death scenes, which are good, but you don't watch them to get scared and I have no idea how you can get scared watching that.
You seem to have a very specific view of what constitutes a horror movie. I certainly agree that The Exorcist is a horror movie, but the Saw films - gratuitous though they may be - certainly qualify, as well. [cut] in much the same way that the original Halloween (one of the best horror movies of all time, IMO), ushered in the 80s glut of slasher flicks. Horror films are cyclic - the popularity of The Ring created the PG-13 horror genre, leading to movies being cut specifically to fit that rating.
What actually qualifies SAW as a Horror, I can understand Halloween and The Ring being more atmospherically based alongside tension build ups etc.

SAW is pretty much

1. Puppeteer who has as much anger vs the world as an angsty teenage girl except has the means to carry out his plans.
2. Dark Dreary atmosphere
3. Over the top, unnecessary gore filler
4. Terrible writing and acting
5. A movie for kids below the age of 17.
Ok, let's all agree right now that the Saw movies aren't good movies. You are absolutely correct that the writing and acting are bad, and that they're about as sophisticated as my cat. But not being a good movie doesn't mean it's not a horror movie. You don't like the protagonist, but the godlike villain is a staple of horror, as is the dark, dreary atmosphere, the isolation, the feeling of helplessness, and so forth. Are there better examples of horror? Sure. But that doesn't mean Saw isn't horror.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Wow, I thought this would suck. I mean, after Saw III and IV...

Btw, this still isn't the game with the most exploded heads ever. Try playing PsiOps - every time you sneak-sap someone, their head bursts from your PSYCHIC ABILITIES!!!
Catchy Slogan said:
If it's anything like the first Saw movie, then I might buy it. I didn't relly like any of the movies past number 2, and that was pushing it a bit.
Pretty much my thoughts. Especially since I watched the first 3 movies one after another with few of my friends and we all agreed that 1 was great, 2 was okay, 3 was meh.

...Just like Matrix.
 

Voltano

New member
Dec 11, 2008
374
0
0
My instructor for a "Gothic Horror Literature" class (which was a lot of fun) basically described "horror" as the only genre that is named after a familiar emotion, fear. There are also games, books and movies that have horrific elements but are not labeled as "horror", per se. I'm a fan of the "King's Field" games for the Playstation/Playstation 2 consoles, and while the game was good for an FPS RPG, the game(s) did well in capturing the feel of a dungeon that it was a little creepy (especially with those damn transparent ghosts).

On Topic: Nice Review Susan. It seems like it's going back to the original roots of the first two (though I think the first one was the best so far). It's also nice to see the idea of horror games branching off to other genres besides adventure/action gameplay. This kind of reminds me of a grim/gritty version of "Spy vs. Spy".
 

AGNGoo

New member
Dec 26, 2008
29
0
0
Abedeus said:
Wow, I thought this would suck. I mean, after Saw III and IV...

Btw, this still isn't the game with the most exploded heads ever. Try playing PsiOps - every time you sneak-sap someone, their head bursts from your PSYCHIC ABILITIES!!!
Catchy Slogan said:
If it's anything like the first Saw movie, then I might buy it. I didn't relly like any of the movies past number 2, and that was pushing it a bit.
Pretty much my thoughts. Especially since I watched the first 3 movies one after another with few of my friends and we all agreed that 1 was great, 2 was okay, 3 was meh.

...Just like Matrix.
I'd have to say the game is probably closer to the second movie than the first. It's set between those two and uses the characters from the first, but it has the same "one large environment trap broken into a series of smaller trials" set up as the second (or probably closer to the third, since all of the trials involve one person having to try to save other people). It was, however, written by James Wan and Leigh Whannell, the writers of the first movie, and they also helped to design the traps.
 

addeB

New member
Oct 2, 2009
615
0
0
I am going to give this game a try ;) hope i like the game as much as the movies :D
 

[Cold-Shoulder]

New member
Jun 5, 2009
880
0
0
Good review, I didn't even know Saw the game was even out. :/
I saw two Saw movies, the first one was okay but the ending was predictable, the second movie was horrible but I couldn't guess what the ending was.
What movie was the game more along the lines of if you don't mind me asking?
 

Dannie

New member
Oct 4, 2009
61
0
0
Catchy Slogan said:
If it's anything like the first Saw movie, then I might buy it. I didn't relly like any of the movies past number 2, and that was pushing it a bit.
Yeah, same here. I really like the first movie but the others aren't that great. But the game looks interesting.
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
CaptainChaosify said:
Good review, I didn't even know Saw the game was even out. :/
I saw two Saw movies, the first one was okay but the ending was predictable, the second movie was horrible but I couldn't guess what the ending was.
What movie was the game more along the lines of if you don't mind me asking?
Hmm...I don't want to give away a lot for the folks who might enjoy playing it, but given that you play as Detective Tapp and run into more than one person from his past...it's kind of like a blend of 2 and 3. It's definitely more trap-based than the original Saw, which had a far more robust storyline.
 

Taerdin

New member
Nov 7, 2006
977
0
0
So the game has a creepy and unsettling atmosphere, it's based on a series of horror films, and the entire objective of the game itself is to survive... but it's not survival horror?

I'm incredibly confused by this concept and if someone could explain it to me then I would greatly appreciate it. Plus to narrowly define survival horror and then defend saw against other peoples narrow definitions of horror seems kinda... funny
 

Susan Arendt

Nerd Queen
Jan 9, 2007
7,222
0
0
Taerdin said:
So the game has a creepy and unsettling atmosphere, it's based on a series of horror films, and the entire objective of the game itself is to survive... but it's not survival horror?

I'm incredibly confused by this concept and if someone could explain it to me then I would greatly appreciate it. Plus to narrowly define survival horror and then defend saw against other peoples narrow definitions of horror seems kinda... funny
Yeah, I knew I was going to get an argument on the survival horror line. :) Well, to my mind, at least, survival horror involves an impending threat from an outside enemy -- zombies, monsters, ghosts, whathaveyou, which is not the case with Saw. So it's not survival horror in the typical sense. That's my personal take on it, anyway, but your mileage may vary.
 

A Weary Exile

New member
Aug 24, 2009
3,784
0
0
Susan Arendt said:
Fools! All horror movies are inferior in the prescence of The Shining (Best horror movie ever IMO)! :)

Saw could've been much better, it had a good concept but decided to focus on gore rather than a psychological element of horror, which would have been much more frightening. That said, time limits have always made me nervous in games and that combined with what appear to be reasonably tough puzzles should make my heart pump, a definite rental.