Welcome to the Fun House! Remember the rules:Supahewok said:Also, despite following the Escapist for a long while, I don't think I've ever posted before. Recent... events in gaming space have encouraged me to start speaking out, just a little. So hi!
Not quite true. If you go rewatch it isn't powered by the tesseract. It is powered by the same energy as the tesseract. Which would shoehorn into Guardians origin of the stones nicely. 2 stones are dangerous to keep together, remember? Possibly because among other things they can counteract and influence each other.Timmaaaah said:I thought it was a stone at first, but then I went back and watched the Avengers and they mention that his staff is powered by the tesseract. Wouldn't make sense for it to be a stone.Supahewok said:(Although, I feel like I need a disclaimer to get something off my chest I've been holding for at least a year: LOKI'S STAFF IS NOT A FRIGGIN STONE. Could go into all sorts of reasons why that is, but I'll stick with the simplest: color coding. There are 6 colors for 6 stones. Aside from being fact, it was confirmed in Guardians, when the Collector gave us all his little history lesson: 6 stones with 6 colors are clearly shown. The stone in Loki's staff is blue. It's powered by the Tesseract. Making that blue stone another Infinity stone would just be confusing for the audience to keep track of. Sorry if I seem cross, I've just seen that speculation as taken for fact here and other places too many times and its gotten under my skin. Feels nice to let it out. Don't mean to offend, after all, I'm rampantly speculating here as well )
Ummm? Not to spoil anything, but if you have not read it, you might want to look into the actual comic Civil War storyline. It's going to be another "Winter Soldier" moment where the comic nerds know what's comming and get yelled at for spoiling things that have been basic fact and major character elements for 10+ years.Ukomba said:Put me down for team Iron Man! Woot! I know it's a Cap movie so he'll have to loose, but still .
I also like the idea of the Superhero Registration Act if they play it as the moral grey area it is. A Rights vs Gun Registration type scenario. Of course, if they make one side the obvious good side it'll loose a lot.
I imagine there just using the title similar to what there doing with AoU.erttheking said:I'm not sure if I'm on board with this. I haven't liked what I read about Civil War in the comics. They better knock the writing out of the park with this one.
(Besides, weren't they supposed to be fighting Thanos?)
I seriously hope that's the case. The appeal of Avengers (For me anyway) is to see all these heroes standing together. Not against each other.MatParker116 said:I imagine there just using the title similar to what there doing with AoU.erttheking said:I'm not sure if I'm on board with this. I haven't liked what I read about Civil War in the comics. They better knock the writing out of the park with this one.
(Besides, weren't they supposed to be fighting Thanos?)
I would think the opposite. All the problems in Iron Man 3 were caused by unknown supers. If they had been registered (and their source of powers known) it could never have happened. I would argue that the events of Iron Man 3 would push Tony toward super registration.ravenshrike said:Sorry but given the events of IM3 the idea that the MCU Tony Stark would be remotely pro registration is laughable.
Aren't they doing a new civil war in the comics? It could be based on that, or a combination of the two.Trishbot said:HOW are they going to do Civil War? It will have to be something other than "superhero registration", mainly because almost nobody in the current MCU even HAS a secret identity.
The world knows Tony Stark is Iron Man.
The world knows Steve Rogers is Captain America.
Thor is Thor and has no secret identity.
Bruce Banner is on the run because the government knows who he is.
Black Widow leaked all her and SHILED's personnel files to the public, so she (and Hawkeye and others) have no safe aliases.
The ONLY hero in the current MCU with a secret identity is Daredevil, and he's on a Netflix series that probably won't tie into the movies.
Civil War would have to be over something different.
Ya, that's my big problem too. Maybe they'll flip the roles? Something major would have to happen for this Tony to suddenly be siding with the government on this. At least Cap works for a government agency right now... er, sort of. It would make more sense for them to flip the roles.ravenshrike said:Sorry but given the events of IM3 the idea that the MCU Tony Stark would be remotely pro registration is laughable.
Cap spent the whole movie fighting against government/military's ability to monitor and dispose of people. The only "supers" he encountered were Barnes and probably Batroc. Most of it was corrupt agents and politicians.Jim_Callahan said:Why do you think those will be the sides this time?Spaceman Spiff said:I had a similar thought about the MCU Stark, but I think he may have a change of heart in Avengers 2 (maybe due to the 'miraculous' twins showing up). It definitely won't be Cap'n on the registration side after Winter Soldier.
Cap just spent an entire movie learning exactly how badly letting powerful people keep their secrets can get in the form of an entire global agency of super-powered spies essentially going rogue due to lack of civilian oversight, and Stark has spent three movies telling the government that his tech is his and they can have his secrets over his dead body and most of theirs.
Sticking Cap on the "no secrets" side of things and Iron Man on the "masks 4eva" side wouldn't be a stretch at all for movie continuity, even assuming they decide to put this conflict in the same terms as the last big dumb crossover event.