Now remove the words "the need for" and see what you get!fix-the-spade said:The robot [...] may eliminate the need for human astronauts altogether in future missions.
Now remove the words "the need for" and see what you get!fix-the-spade said:The robot [...] may eliminate the need for human astronauts altogether in future missions.
I need to know what movie now.JCAll said:Those are what the police used to beat suspects with before they invented nightsticks.American Fox said:What's a phone book?
I learned that from terrible movies, so it's definitely accurate.
More or less, though if it has to use things designed for humans, not killbots (which most things are going to be for quite a while), a human shape will help. Being stuck with legacy systems is annoying, yeah.Kyrian007 said:That's particularly inefficient design. Why not design a killbot with built in guns (in the chest or head)... and hands that could choke humans in melee distance. And why not more arms, if it is going to be holding guns wouldn't holding a half dozen be better than 2, with some more arms and hands left over for the choking. There's really no benefit in designing a humanoid form for a killbot. Evolution guided our forms to bipedal humanoid... and evolution is a chump compared to what we can design in an actual killing machine. Remember robot wars, the first season or whatever there were fire spitting bots and complicated spinning blades and hammers and such... and it was all useless compared to the rolling wedge that could just knock all those others over. The perfect killbot would be just the phantasam ball with a spike on it. Just flies around and stabs meatbags. Small target profile, difficult to shoot or disable... very simple programming 10 fly around 20 stab anything human shaped and/or temperature, goto 10.
Simply untrue. If there's one thing the modern military approach to foreign warfare has proven us is that air superiority is woefully inefficient at keeping order on land. Good at blowing shit up though.cleric of the order said:terminators aren't even economically viable It wouldn't make sense to use the,
fucking drones are scarier shit and that stuff doesn't have to unmanned, are reasonably easier to produce, distribute and generally harder to shoot down.
As it stands it's a fucking waste to build a robot that shoots guns when you could just pay people to pilot drones.
One that can be handled by regulars if you actually want to hold ground, robots will never be ass effective and with the current world's population the components of a soldier is cheaper than a terminatorJamesStone said:Simply untrue. If there's one thing the modern military approach to foreign warfare has proven us is that air superiority is woefully inefficient at keeping order on land. Good at blowing shit up though.
Yeah this is exactly what I was thinking. Bit odd for a supposed space program to suddenly be interested in playing Robo-Rambo.Blitsie said:Hahaha of course! And they're just making it good at shooting stuff in case it runs into any aliens out in space there right?
Honestly all I can say about AI at the moment is that Nier Automata fucking scarred me, they should play it hahahaha
Exactly! While I can't say what their ultimate agenda is with this thing, they definitely made a robot that can shoot because they wanted to make a robot that can shoot, the whole space thing is most definitely an excuse. Or maybe even a half-truth.Infernal Lawyer said:Yeah this is exactly what I was thinking. Bit odd for a supposed space program to suddenly be interested in playing Robo-Rambo.Blitsie said:Hahaha of course! And they're just making it good at shooting stuff in case it runs into any aliens out in space there right?
Honestly all I can say about AI at the moment is that Nier Automata fucking scarred me, they should play it hahahaha