"Fuck, I hate living next to the airport!"OniaPL said:Even the current Xbox makes ungodly noise, I wonder what this would be like.
"Actually, that's my new xbox..."
"Fuck, I hate living next to the airport!"OniaPL said:Even the current Xbox makes ungodly noise, I wonder what this would be like.
Well, as people have said, if it is legit, the document is from 2010, so they could have pushed it back.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:An 8 core CPU, another 3 core CPU for backwards compatibility, 4 GB of RAM, and updated Kinect hardware, retailing for $299?
Yeah, colour me cynical. If Microsoft are going for a 2013 release date, why did they not mention anything about this at E3? According to this document, they've got a year to drum up hype for the new console, and they didn't show it off at the world's biggest gameshow?
I dunno, maybe it's legit. But it seems strange that they'd be going for a release date one year from now, yet release no information about the console to the public.
Is a gymnasium coming with it so I can fit all these fucking people? Most people barely have enough space to play single player Kinect comfortably. The ads right now are humorous in the endless expanse of living space that they play in.Andy Chalk said:while the upgraded Kinect hardware will offer greater accuracy, better speech recognition and support for up to four players at once.
I have to be sceptical, seeing as how that's my job, but my assumption would be that it either, isn't real or isn't going as they planned. Considering the article is from 2010, it's possible that they haven't been meeting schedule, which is why it hasn't been announced. My personal opinion though is that it's fake. There is no way in the world it would go to market at $299 (I assume US dollars). It's probably some nuts way of having fun.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:An 8 core CPU, another 3 core CPU for backwards compatibility, 4 GB of RAM, and updated Kinect hardware, retailing for $299?
Yeah, colour me cynical. If Microsoft are going for a 2013 release date, why did they not mention anything about this at E3? According to this document, they've got a year to drum up hype for the new console, and they didn't show it off at the world's biggest gameshow?
I dunno, maybe it's legit. But it seems strange that they'd be going for a release date one year from now, yet release no information about the console to the public.
It depends; they want it to be more than just a gaming device; they want the next console to be a home entertainment device. Home Entertainment also includes watching movies; Sony won that format war.Uber Waddles said:Its a fake. They said they wanted Bluray technology. Which means with every disk and console release, Microsoft would have to pay royalties to Sony, its major competitor.
Thats good business right there.
Seriously. Sony owns BluRay. Why would Microsoft then impliment it if it requires them to pay extra? They already lose money on console sales...
well the developers showed off alot of very good looking demos at both MS and sony's press confresses so the systems most likely excist (it was suspected by most of the media there)Sonic Doctor said:Well, as people have said, if it is legit, the document is from 2010, so they could have pushed it back.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:An 8 core CPU, another 3 core CPU for backwards compatibility, 4 GB of RAM, and updated Kinect hardware, retailing for $299?
Yeah, colour me cynical. If Microsoft are going for a 2013 release date, why did they not mention anything about this at E3? According to this document, they've got a year to drum up hype for the new console, and they didn't show it off at the world's biggest gameshow?
I dunno, maybe it's legit. But it seems strange that they'd be going for a release date one year from now, yet release no information about the console to the public.
But you might want to think before you say what you said. What I'm getting at is that 2013 release date doesn't meant that it has to release on the first day of 2013. At E3 2013, they could very well make the announcement, the new Xbox will be released holiday 2013. That gives people at least 5 months to prepare and save money. If that is the case, then developers are most likely already working on games for the new system as we speak, but of course that type of stuff would be kept hush hush.
no sony own about 25% of all blueray prodution, and they do not own the rites to blueray as a format.mad825 said:Sony does and Sony gets paid royalty for every BluRay disc.Jamash said:Sony doesn't own Blu-ray, it's just one of the many companies that make up the Blu-ray Disc Association.Uber Waddles said:Its a fake. They said they wanted Bluray technology. Which means with every disk and console release, Microsoft would have to pay royalties to Sony, its major competitor.
Thats good business right there.
Seriously. Sony owns BluRay. Why would Microsoft then impliment it if it requires them to pay extra? They already lose money on console sales...
Honestly, BluRay is shit. Any optical medium is shit. The way forward are HDDs and SDDs although this may compromise DRM.
Because it'll run at 720p now.Scrustle said:Seems like it's real to me. Maybe not everything in it will be in the final product but most of it seems very likely. But I really hope "720" is just a running title. Why can't they just call it the Xbox 3 or something that's at least less retarded than anything else that's been speculated so far?