Rumor: Lingerie Model Replacing Megan Fox in Transformers 3

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
I hope she does well, and she can't really do much worse than Fox did.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
danpascooch said:
Of course they chose a lingerie model, the last thing they would want is to CAST AN ACTOR in that role!
Oh come on, you're watching a film that's mainly about robots fighting and scrotum jokes produced for the mass's and not for hardcore fans. what are you expecting?

Its meant to be a low story, high action, fast cars and hot babes sorta deal. Why hasn't anyone got this by now. I don't say I like it, but I am surprised everyone else is acting pissy about this.
 

hyperdrachen

New member
Jan 1, 2008
468
0
0
MaxChaos said:
Swapping a 'HURR' for a 'DURR'.

Sigh.

If the next film doesn't have a more favourable Robot Action: People Being Annoying ratio then I'm going to be extremely disappointed. Again.
well it won't matter how dissapointed you are if you go pass that hack 8 bucks of your money. Megan fox has a damn bit part in the movies shes not what makes them suck, the shitty writing and cinematography do that. If you hated the last two and you go see this, you have a problem. A problem that makes Michael Bay very rich. They can cast Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber for all I care, this series will get 0 more dollars from me. I paid for the first movie, and a 3minute youtube video with Devastators Balls, and wheelie humping a leg was all I needed out of the second movie... seriously wtf. Michael Bay must be one of the happiest people on the planet, he spent a sequel mocking the first films detractors and still busted blocks.

P.S. Call me when Transformers gets the Nolan Treatment.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
I said it before and I'll say it again. I'm not going to a movie about Giant Freaking Robots from space to see the humans.

I want giant robots fighting other giant robots in epic battles, not some damn love story.
 

MarsProbe

Circuitboard Seahorse
Dec 13, 2008
2,372
0
0
Hiphophippo said:
Visuality said:
Hiphophippo said:
Doesn't really matter honestly. The other two were shit and this one will be shit. I grew up a GIANT transformer fan and I have yet to see the two Bay movies because I see no reason to pay money to let someone piss on my childhood.
How can you say they're shit if you haven't seen them.

Also, everyone else, megan fox not hot...are you crazy?

While I actually don't really care that Megan Fox is gone, she's still hot.
because I saw the trailer and I know Michael Bay's work. Any transformer's fan that needs more than that I call shenanigans on.

But I'll give you the bit about Megan Fox. People rag on her, but I think she's over the top hot. Not really my kind of girl long term, but hot is hot.
Regardless, judging an entire film based on its trailer is a bit trash. I happened to be a big Transformers fan in my youth but still went to see the film. If you are really that much of a fan, it would take more than a few bad films to ruin your childhood memories. Transformers porn on the other hand, that might just do it...
 

Hiphophippo

New member
Nov 5, 2009
3,509
0
0
MarsProbe said:
If you are really that much of a fan, it would take more than a few bad films to ruin your childhood memories.
Unfortunately for you, you are only able to speak for yourself. Would it ruin my memories? Of course not, but it would tarnish them and that's something I've no need for.

I note you haven't given your opinion of the movies.
 

xHipaboo420x

New member
Apr 22, 2009
1,592
0
0
hyperdrachen said:
well it won't matter how dissapointed you are if you go pass that hack 8 bucks of your money. Megan fox has a damn bit part in the movies shes not what makes them suck, the shitty writing and cinematography do that. If you hated the last two and you go see this, you have a problem. A problem that makes Michael Bay very rich. They can cast Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber for all I care, this series will get 0 more dollars from me. I paid for the first movie, and a 3minute youtube video with Devastators Balls, and wheelie humping a leg was all I needed out of the second movie... seriously wtf. Michael Bay must be one of the happiest people on the planet, he spent a sequel mocking the first films detractors and still busted blocks.

P.S. Call me when Transformers gets the Nolan Treatment.
I guess you're right; as long as I've payed for it, the companies don't give a damn what I think.

[sub]this is why I have a blog[/sub]
 

soapyshooter

That Guy
Jan 19, 2010
1,571
0
0
I thought the replacement would be a grenade launcher that shoots mini nukes and creates spectacular explosions.

Anyhoo...she is HAWTTTTT!
 

Barrett0

New member
Mar 16, 2010
15
0
0
Its a Micheal Bay Film so it will be crap regardless

Who cares if she cant act. Its not like Megan Fox can act either. Both are just eye candy
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,641
0
0
Furburt said:
She's...unsettling looking.

Maybe it's just a bad picture, but she's got a weird waxy tint to her, like she's been embalmed.
Aye, she looks like the new Dr. Who.

Tom Goldman said:
Or, maybe Fox's character Mikaela Banes gets crushed by a giant robot heel in the opening seconds of Transformers 3, so Whiteley's acting chops won't matter...
Is that your way of saying you also think she has a strange face structure?
 

Nalesnik

New member
Nov 10, 2008
189
0
0
Seems like a good casting call to me, considering Megan Fox's character was just there to look pretty.
 

Adzma

New member
Sep 20, 2009
1,287
0
0
So we go from one Bimbo to another Bimbo? I better get some restraint ropes for my childhood. It might descend into anarchy at this point.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,379
0
0
Well I'll give her this, she's attractive and she has a much more friendly and appealing face than Fox. I like models who are capable of a friendly smile rather than an emotionless gaze.
I can't be sure that a model would be a better choice as an actress but I'd happily pick a jar of pickles over Fox if it were me, besides no one really cares about the actors anyway in the Micheal Bay Transformers movies. They prefer to focus on the robots and explosions and such so even if she's not great it won't matter too much and it's nice to have a friendly face.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
Considering what happened with Transformers 2, number 3 just go delegated to wait for DVD status so....I really don't care.
Souplex said:
IF they follow through it proves the character was nothing but cheap fanservice.
Like there is any doubt of that in the first place.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Disaster Button said:
So they're getting a different actor to play the same character?

I hate when that happens.
Umm, The Dark Knight had Maggie Gylennhall play Rachel Dawes, and she was much better than the girl from Batman Begins.

Not all actor changes are bad. This one however, will be bad regardless.