CardinalPiggles said:
barbzilla said:
CardinalPiggles said:
Why not ban guns rather than digital media? The government licensed him the means to kill 6 people and it's the fault of a game? I don't understand why civilians need guns nowadays anyway.
I have guns because I have land and animals. There are legitimate reasons for people to own guns, banning the guns means only the criminals will have guns.
As well as crazy people with murderous tendencies. People like that kid who recently shot and killed 6 people because a girl rejected his advances. Or that Danish bloke who shot and killed about 40 people, mainly kids!
Owning guns for the sake of owning guns is ridiculous. I bet this guy didn't have land or keep farm animals.
Having or not having a gun doesn't change the outcome. There are plenty of instances of mass murders and other heinous crimes in places where guns are banned. The reason behind this is that even though guns are banned, guns still exist inside of those countries. The issue is, they are all owned by criminals. Even without guns in the entire world, these things would still happen. Do you think they went without mass murders and other violent crimes before gunpowder was invented? The same thing happens to guns as does video games, people blame the guns for the actions of the people.
I've worked for Law Enforcement in the US, and the majority of violent gun crimes are committed with illegal firearms. The criminals obtain unregistered firearms through black market methods, the same methods they use in countries where guns are banned. So taking away a private citizen's right to own firearms only succeeds in taking away a citizen's firearm. It doesn't take guns out of the hands of the criminals.
Unstable people who go off their rockers and decide to go kill a bunch of people will find a way to do so without firearms if necessary. The same goal can be accomplished using incendiary weapons or explosives, the ingredients of which can be found quite easily (as can the recipes). So instead of being upset at the guns for shooting people, how about being upset at the crazies who kill people.
I hear this argument often enough to know the holes in the logic. Plenty of people get on fine with out guns, and that is fine. I don't have an issue with people not liking guns, and I don't have an issue with countries that ban guns. If that way works for them, more power to them. I, however, will continue owning guns, even if I moved away from the farm and into a city, and I expect it to be no different. With the exception of the firing range, I would probably never have any cause to pull it out of the safe.